@akothari@NotionHQ@ivan@buffer[.com] has a similar story :)
I'll leave the story to @rdutel though, he was the domain whisperer and regaled us with tails about it
Great take. We're about to wade into the swamp and there's way too much inertia to stop that from happening.
As it always does, the pendulum will, eventually, swing back into a more stable hybrid-model when AI-systems can be attributed to negative business outcomes.
I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.
I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).
It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.
The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.
We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.
I worry.
i feel like declaring bankruptcy with @raycast
not that I'd ever NOT use Raycast, rather it feels stuffed with stuff I don't use and I'm overwhelmed by a million options when i β-space
i'm lost with all these extensions, none of which i use. haven't used DALL-E in years, etc.
@RobertDVis@levelsio@grok Is this for real? That's a flex. What benefit does Amazon get by going through a vendor for this? I get just about anybody else, but Amazon could surely operate its own end to end email infra.
Introducing Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable Opus model yet.
It handles long-running tasks with more rigor, follows instructions more precisely, and verifies its own outputs before reporting back.
You can hand off your hardest work with less supervision.