Richard yaminali

get blokes out of womens sport, prisons, change rooms etc, leave kids who are a bit different alone, get gender bullsh*t out of NHS (and everywhere else)

[John James @JohnJamesNI]

Congratulations @YvetteCooperMP, on being appointed Health Secretary.

Children as young as 11 are about to be pumped full of dangerous puberty blockers - many of whom will grow into gay men and lesbians.

As a gay man, I urge you to scrap the trial immediately!

#StopTheTrial

[Richard yaminali @richardyaminali]

Yep, comparing a woman to a transvestite is bullsh1t, no such thing as “transgender”

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

It’s what they revert to every time. Boring. Tells you exactly who & what they are. Bully first, if that doesn’t work, try insults. Crazy though that they see comparing a woman to a transwomen is supposed to be an insult! 😂

[Mara Yamauchi @mara_yamauchi]

Because men absolutely cannot tolerate being told no. Their demands & desires must be accommodated always, regardless of the cost to women.

Well, they will just have to accept no. 😡

[ICONS @icons_women]

🎾Breaking: No men allowed in women’s professional tennis

The Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) implements sex-screening for all players “to preserve the integrity of women’s professional tennis and maintain fair competition conditions for all players…”

Thank you to tennis stars @Martina @ChrissieEvert and @SabalenkaA for being outspoken advocates of fair sport and equal opportunities for women. 👏👏👏

[Martina Navratilova @Martina]

@swiateksg1rl WTA supports all women. As in females. There is no such thing as an invasive transphobic test- just a once in a lifetime cheek swab- takes all of three seconds. Got it?
Males are free to play in the men’s tournaments however they might identify.
Simple.

[Dennis Noel Kavanagh @Jebadoo2]

What he said was revolting, but I completely fail to see how it amounts to a criminal offence. In DPP v Redmond Bate Lord Justice Sedley memorably said free speech includes offensive speech.

https://t.co/q6DfY7053r

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

"Trans ex-Labour candidate is charged over posts in wake of Ann Widdecombe's death."

This man, "Heather" Herbert is obviously a disgusting human being. But he's entitled to express his opinion of Ann Widdecombe, no matter how horrible. He didn't incite violence so there was no crime. He must be free to say what he thinks, and we are free to judge him - including his employers, depending on his contract. But it's not a police matter.

Free speech is for everyone, not just for people we agree with. 

https://t.co/TpBn3lPpgq

[Barry Wall @HeadWarriorTWM]

Right....how did we get to this, the first sign that a child has a mental illness and the parent should know 5 minutes later.

You don't hate these people enough.

UK government ministers have clarified that schools do not have a duty to inform parents simply because a child is questioning their gender.

Notification is only required if the child requests a social transition step like changing their name or pronouns.

By which point the cult has them.

[Barry Wall @HeadWarriorTWM]

Squirming is to kind of a word for this performance from the Health Secretary.

The callous and cold avoidance once again shows the fetid core of "True Trans" to be alive and well in this excuse for a nation state.

We are talking here about children as young as eleven, which he conveniently calls "young people" in his attempt to shore up the socially constructed horror show that is Trans.

Words create reality in this insane world of obeyance to the belief system and the flesh sacrifice it inevitably demands.

We must stop paddling in their pool.

Call it what it is - A Cult.

[Richard yaminali @richardyaminali]

Still waiting for a definition of “gender”, the whole transgender thing is bullsh1t

[Joe Robertson MP @JoePJRobertson]

Proceeding with a Puberty Blocker Trial on physically healthy young children is morally and ethically wrong. It simply should not be going ahead.

[Claire Fox @Fox_Claire]

My question on the government's statement for the dangerously drafted Conversion Practices draft bill. The Labour minister presents it as fighting against serious abuse, but actually it threatens to criminalise parents for refusing to affirm gender identity (ie trying to 'convert' so-called trans kids). So if Mum insists you aren't born in the wrong body, or Dad refuses to pay for his kid's puberty blockers, the police or social services could be at their door.

[Dennis Noel Kavanagh @Jebadoo2]

This is a very important point.

[Dennis Noel Kavanagh @Jebadoo2]

1/ In a criminal trial a jury can ask questions by sending notes to the Judge. Here are 10 jury notes that would derail a Conversion Practices trial:

"I am gender critical and do not believe in transgender identity which is just really gender identity, can I sit on this case?"

[Jo Bartosch @jo_bartosch]

89% of the girls referred to the now-closed GIDS were same-sex attracted. If vulnerable LGB teens are affirmed to see themselves as the opposite sex rather than helped to accept their sexuality, that is gay conversion therapy. That is what you are supporting. I would be happy to meet to discuss this further, or to arrange for you to speak either with detransitioners or @AllianceLGB

[Róisín Murphy @roisinmurphy]

I don’t believe men can actually be women.

[Dennis Noel Kavanagh @Jebadoo2]

The Conversion Bill is Labour's Section 28.

It is now illegal to tell your teenage daughter she should grow up to be a happy lesbian instead of securing puberty blockers and testosterone

That's the real conversion therapy.

Telling gay teens they are sick and need fixing.

[Bev Jackson @BevJacksonAuth]

Labour is now committed to its section 28 on steroids

Let’s remember: section 28 was a horrendous law that intimidated teachers and others, suppressed the dissemination of information about homosexuality.

It was homophobic and it was awful.
But it did not create a criminal offence.
It did not prescribe penalties.

The Labour Party’s draft bill to ban “conversion practices” is also homophobic. It also sets out to suppress the dissemination of information.

But it is far, far worse than section 28

It will criminalize a parent who says: “No, you’re a boy. Maybe you’re gay. That’s fine: Let’s get you some therapy to explore the causes of your distress.”

It will criminalize a parent who says “No, I refuse to pay for binders, blockers, testosterone. You’re a girl. It’s fine to be a lesbian.”

Such conversations may cause extreme distress. The minor may call them abusive.

We’re talking about a criminal offence of refusing to allow your child to take harmful drugs. Of suggesting she might be a lesbian - not a boy. Of refusing to go along with her insistent demands.

***With a potential 5-year prison sentence.•***

Let’s stop Labour’s Section 28!

We will not accept this latest iteration of anti gay and anti lesbian legislation - however well it is dressed up to look “progressive.”

[Caroline Farrow @CF_Farrow]

They published the conversion therapy bill this morning. I’ve read all 20 pages so you don’t have to. It’s worse than the press release admits.

Doctors are protected; the bill carves them out.

Mums aren’t. There’s no equivalent line anywhere in it for a parent.

And “emotional pressure” is written in as something that can make your conduct “abusive.”

So a mum who urges her daughter to wait, to be at peace with her body, is left to a prosecutor’s view of whether that was abuse. She could get up to 5 years in prison.

It goes further. The police or your local council can ask a court to order you to stop, before any charge, before any offence, and even without you in the room to defend yourself. Breaking that order is itself a crime.

Hilary Cass was reassured doctors could keep working. Fine. Now show me the line that protects a mother.

There isn’t one.

It needs stopping.

[Jonathan Hinder MP @Jonathan_Hinder]

Blocking healthy children’s puberty is WRONG.

[Dennis Noel Kavanagh @Jebadoo2]

Unison want the UK to be Australia.

They want female only spaces to disappear which requires the legal abolition of the concept of women in law. That in turn defeats gay rights and makes it illegal for lesbians to meet without men

This is deeply misogynist and it’s homophobic