@PeterSchiff
First you cried that Saylor was buying “too much” Bitcoin.
Now you’re crying that he’s selling Bitcoin.
Pick a lane, Peter. Your Bitcoin derangement syndrome is getting embarrassing.
Saylor built a $50B+ BTC treasury.
You just tweet cope all day.
Rent-free living continues. 😂
#Bitcoin #Strategy
This misses the point. MSTR was a leveraged BTC proxy with premium, it outperforms on the way up and underperforms harder on the way down. That’s how leverage works.
Now at discount to NAV with 847k BTC on balance sheet, it’s positioned for snapback when sentiment flips. The $1.7B dividends are covered by ATM equity raises, rate adjustments on preferreds, and minimal BTC sales if needed. Not a “dream” it’s a deliberate machine for accumulation.
Premiums come and go in cycles. History shows the reflexivity engine rewards patience. Outperformance returns on reversal. DYOR. 🚀
Saylor nunca dijo “nunca venderé ni un solo sat”. La regla es no liquidar el stack en bear market por pánico. Vendieron 32 BTC (mínimo, simbólico) para cubrir dividendos en un dip con 847.000 BTC en balance (~$50B+).
Es gestión de liquidez inteligente, no quiebra. El historial de Saylor es acumular a través de ciclos y salir más fuerte. El mercado absorbe ventas pequeñas sin drama; el problema sería pánico retail vendiendo por FUD como este.
@dampedspring declares victory: MSTR now at a big MNAV discount (0.90x per his chart), down 82% vs BTC’s 36% drop. He’s been warning to sell MSTR for BTC/IBIT since late 2024, now muting everyone and moving on, calling it “over and boring.”
Short, forceful English response:
Classic victory lap at the exact wrong time. MSTR at 0.9x NAV with 847k BTC (~$50.5B) vs ~$46.8B claims is not the end, it’s the setup for mean reversion when BTC rebounds.
Leveraged proxies amplify both ways: bigger drawdown, bigger snapback. The “premium is gone” crowd said the same at previous bottoms.
Saylor’s reflexivity machine runs on cycles, not linear decline. History favors the accumulator, not the quitter. Thanks for the liquidity. DYOR. 🚀
Peter Schiff, the eternal goldbug who’s been wrong on Bitcoin for over a decade, is at it again with his doomer predictions.
Saylor built a reflexivity engine around the hardest asset on earth, 847k BTC that no one can dilute. Schiff’s “ponzi” and “bankruptcy” screams ignore the math: long-term debt, adjustable preferred yields, and massive BTC holdings that dwarf short-term obligations.
Schiff predicted Bitcoin to zero countless times. Reality: BTC lives, Strategy accumulates through cycles. History shows who regrets what.
Classic legacy cope. DYOR — this noise is fuel for the next leg up. 🚀
This “deep” take is just polished FUD. No margin calls, no forced liquidation, Strategy’s BTC was bought with long-term debt, not margin loans. 847k BTC stack (~$51B) dwarfs short-term needs.
The “reflexivity loop” works both ways: it built the legend on the way up and creates buying pressure on reversal. Cash runway is manageable with equity issuance, rate adjustments, and minimal sales.
Viral panic posts like this are the noise, not the signal. BTC bottoms breed maximum fear. Saylor’s machine has survived worse. DYOR, this is a dip, not doom. 🚀
FUD barato de siempre.
Bitcoin en corrección normal (volátil como siempre). STRC es preferred stock variable que sube yield cuando baja de $100 (ahora más atractivo). MSTR es proxy apalancado de BTC, cae más y rebota más.
Strategy tiene 847.000 BTC (valor ~$51 mil millones) y caja dedicada para 10 meses de dividendos. No hay liquidación forzada. Saylor no vende en pánico: acumula.
Esto es dip de mercado, no colapso. El que tiembla vende, el que entiende compra. Historia de Bitcoin: siempre sale más fuerte. #Instruite
@chamath Congrats on the FDA approval for Claire—game-changer for breast cancer surgeries! Have you heard of Leronlimab? It’s a CCR5 inhibitor showing promising results in treating metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, with some patients achieving long-term survival in trials. Could be a potential breakthrough. Check these out:
• Recent pooled survival data: https://t.co/EA1ihkEEOq
• CytoDyn’s presentation on prolonged survival: https://t.co/EsSMQ5sVUZ
• Mechanism and preclinical data: https://t.co/ddYvcm3HMr
• Clinical trial info: https://t.co/LK5oCWskbo
• Latest updates from AACR: https://t.co/DwcLSFEXsJ
What do you think?
Expose Wall Street and fight back
Wall Street thrives in the dark, but #Bitcoin was built for the light. If we want to stop tier-1 quantitative firms from manipulating the market with massive ETF bags and algorithmic dumps, complaining isn't enough.
Here is the concrete blueprint to expose them and fight back: 👇
1. STARVE THEIR LIQUIDITY (Self-Custody)
Market makers rely on massive exchange liquidity to suppress the price, spoof order books, and execute their arbitrage algorithms.
Action: Pull your Bitcoin off the exchanges immediately. Put it in cold storage hardware wallets. If we drain the spot supply from the exchanges, their algorithms break. They can't manipulate what they can't touch. Not your keys, not your coins.
2. STOP FEEDING THE MACHINE (Kill the Leverage)
Firms like Jane Street don't care if BTC goes up or down—they make billions hunting retail liquidations. They engineer wicks to $70k to liquidate shorts, then dump to $66k to wipe out late longs.
Action: Stop trading high leverage. You are literally the product. Switch to spot-only DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging). If we stop giving them liquidation pools to hunt, we remove their financial incentive to swing the market.
3. TRACK THEIR FOOTPRINTS (Follow the Data)
They are used to the legacy system where they can hide. They can't hide on a public ledger.
Action: Expose them in real-time.
• Use the SEC "EDGAR" database to search 13F filings and publicly post their ETF/MSTR stockpiles.
• Use on-chain tools like Arkham Intelligence to tag and track institutional OTC wallet addresses.
• Expose their options traps by posting Deribit "Max Pain" and Gamma Exposure data.
If we expose their wallets, drain their exchange liquidity, and stop handing them our leverage, Wall Street loses its grip on our asset.
Take your Bitcoin back.
#BTC #SelfCustody
“You can buy any amount of Bitcoin today and have a better average that Saylor”
Yeah not so much. I think you mean “Strategy B”… not “Saylor”
Michael Saylor personally owns ~17,700 Bitcoin that he bought back in 2020 for ~$9k cost avg
I’m willing to bet that 99% of the morons that try to dunk on him don’t even know he’s sitting on over $1B in personal profits in Bitcoin alone
Frankly, I don’t care one way or another. I just think it’s funny that people live in their own realities that they make for themselves
Elon Musk “We are in the singularity”
The technological singularity is a hypothetical point where AI-driven technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, leading to profound, unpredictable changes in human civilization. It's often linked to an "intelligence explosion" from self-improving AGI surpassing human intelligence
“Bitcoin’s fair value is $0”.
Let’s separate what’s factual from what’s narrative-driven FUD 🧵
Claim: “BTC = 0. That’s where the math takes us.”
Reality: There is no accepted valuation model that outputs zero unless you assume total protocol failure.
That’s an assumption, not math.
Claim: “Bitcoin failed as a dollar hedge & trades like Nasdaq.”
Fact: BTC has correlated with risk assets since 2020.
Missing context: Over every 4+ year window, BTC massively outperformed USD. Liquidity cycles ≠ long-term hedge failure.
Claim: “Bitcoin isn’t used as a medium of exchange.”
True — and irrelevant.
Bitcoin evolved into a settlement & store-of-value layer, not a retail payments rail. Gold isn’t used at Starbucks either.
Claim: “No central bank will own BTC because Saylor controls the float.”
False.
MicroStrategy holds ~1–2% of supply. That’s influence—not control. Sovereigns already hold BTC directly and indirectly.
Claim: “Miners are bleeding cash. The network is dying.”
Fact: Miner stress happens every cycle post-halving.
Reality: Hashrate is near all-time highs. Capitulation historically marks consolidation—not collapse.
Claim: “Bitcoin wastes energy and isn’t green.”
Framing issue.
Bitcoin converts energy into security. Mining increasingly uses stranded, excess, and renewable power. Efficiency ≠ purpose.
Most of these arguments aren’t new.
They appear every bear cycle, mix short-term truths with long-term conclusions, and frame design tradeoffs as fatal flaws.
Bitcoin doesn’t need to replace Visa or be ESG-friendly.
It just needs to keep doing what it already does:
clear globally, resist censorship, and survive.
That’s not a zero thesis.
@CryptoNobler
Not a full Senate vote tomorrow 3PM ET it’s a markup in Agri Committee, postponed due to East Coast winter storm (now likely Thurs/Fri).
Bill is legit & bullish (more CFTC power = less SEC drama), but ‘pass = parabolic / fail = dump’ is classic CT FOMO.
Structural win incoming, just not overnight. Accumulate dips 🚀❄️
@GoingParabolic Stop lying bro! 🚫
X announced Smart Cashtags for real-time price tracking & asset mentions in the timeline – NOT in-app Bitcoin/crypto TRADING.
Here’s the original from X’s Head of Product:
https://t.co/M9YiJPGbXP
X is the best source for financial news -- and hundreds of billions of dollars are deployed based on things people read here.
We are building Smart Cashtags that allow you to specify the exact asset (or smart contract) when posting a ticker. From Timeline, users will be able to tap them to see its real-time price along with all mentions of that asset.
We're aiming to collect feedback as we iterate toward a public release next month.
"Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. Gold does!"
Oh, does it now?
Let me blow your mind: 95% of gold sits in vaults doing absolutely nothing.
It's not powering electronics at scale. It's not being worn. It's just... sitting there. Because humans decided it's valuable.
That's not intrinsic value. That's monetary premium.
The exact same thing Bitcoin has. Except Bitcoin does it better:
• Harder to confiscate
• Easier to verify
• Impossible to counterfeit
• Infinitely divisible
• Moves at the speed of light across the planet
The "intrinsic value" argument is pure copium. If jewelry demand vanished tomorrow, gold would still be valuable—not because you can make circuits with it, but because of its monetary properties.
Just like Bitcoin.
"Gold will be the reserve currency!"
The gold standard failed. You know why?
Because governments couldn't print their way out of wars and welfare programs while on it. So they ditched it.
They called it "flexibility." I call it theft.
"Moderate inflation (~2%) is good!"
Good for WHO exactly?
Not savers. Not workers. Not anyone whose paycheck is denominated in melting currency.
Inflation is a hidden tax. It quietly transfers wealth from you to asset holders and everyone closest to the money printer: governments, banks, the Cantillon crew.
"But 2% is harmless!"
Really? Compound that over 30 years and your dollar loses about 45% of its purchasing power.
But wait, it gets worse.
Real monetary expansion runs closer to 6%. At that rate, your dollar loses HALF its value in roughly 12 years.
Ouch.
Bitcoin fixes this.