@steipete@codependent_ai I am sorry to say that Peter is not burning enough tokens.
Not fast enough.
The most Peter burns, the more all of us benefit from it.
@morganlinton Your insight on Grok Build is very helpful.
Please keep posting.
Cannot wait for it to exceed codex and Claude code performance.
All of us want Elon to succeed.
I'm increasingly convinced that "AI-native" does not mean adding a chatbot to the existing business.
It means asking where the business itself becomes software-readable.
Where is the demand?
Who owns the workflow?
What gets routed?
What gets approved?
What is measured?
What breaks first?
This works really well btw, at the end of your query ask your LLM to "structure your response as HTML", then view the generated file in your browser. I've also had some success asking the LLM to present its output as slideshows, etc.
More generally, imo audio is the human-preferred input to AIs but vision (images/animations/video) is the preferred output from them. Around a ~third of our brains are a massively parallel processor dedicated to vision, it is the 10-lane superhighway of information into brain. As AI improves, I think we'll see a progression that takes advantage:
1) raw text (hard/effortful to read)
2) markdown (bold, italic, headings, tables, a bit easier on the eyes) <-- current default
3) HTML (still procedural with underlying code, but a lot more flexibility on the graphics, layout, even interactivity) <-- early but forming new good default
...4,5,6,...
n) interactive neural videos/simulations
Imo the extrapolation (though the technology doesn't exist just yet) ends in some kind of interactive videos generated directly by a diffusion neural net. Many open questions as to how exact/procedural "Software 1.0" artifacts (e.g. interactive simulations) may be woven together with neural artifacts (diffusion grids), but generally something in the direction of the recently viral https://t.co/z21CP5iQfu
There are also improvements necessary and pending at the input. Audio nor text nor video alone are not enough, e.g. I feel a need to point/gesture to things on the screen, similar to all the things you would do with a person physically next to you and your computer screen.
TLDR The input/output mind meld between humans and AIs is ongoing and there is a lot of work to do and significant progress to be made, way before jumping all the way into neuralink-esque BCIs and all that. For what's worth exploring at the current stage, hot tip try ask for HTML.
@openclaw Tip: If you are going to entertain OpenClaw naysayers or criticisms, at least do OpenClaw team a service and check if they are bots and have a normal life (just see their X profile).
80-96% of negative/unproductive talk here are from bots or saboteurs.
I upgraded to OpenClaw 2026.5.4 🦞.
Telegram, Discord & Whatsapp functioning smoothly like nothing happened.
For those of us who may have some "OpenClaw upgrade issues or downtime" after upgrade, strongly recommend to remove all your "custom" workarounds that you did for OpenClaw 80%-96% is the likely culprit.
The goblins may be hiding in your custom settings for plugins or you haven't setup your allowed-list for access (channel group etc), exec approvals etc.
Codex with gpt-5.5 is your best friend.
Malaysia OpenClawers, let's go!
@steipete@RodrigoLFarinha I was there when Clawdbot came into this world in diapers.
OpenClaw changed everyone’s life.
Including mine.
Not going back.
OpenClaw for the win.
The whole Malaysia is behind @steipete
In the final analysis, whatever tokens Peter burn opened my eyes to a possible future that i thought was 5-10 years away.
Yes i lost sleep. I burnt gazillion tokens to debug and troubleshoot OpenClaw. I screamed at OpenClaw like daily if not weekly.
But in the end, I am still team OpenClaw.
Keep holding the light Peter.
For in darkness we scream at you, but in secret the 99% majority thank you for liberating us.
Only one chance in this lifetime…
Like watching sunset at the beach from the most foreign seat in the cosmos, I couldn’t resist a cell phone video of Earthset. You can hear the shutter on the Nikon as @Astro_Christina is hammering away on 3-shot brackets and capturing those exceptional Earthset photos through the 400mm lens. @AstroVicGlover was in window 3 watching with @Astro_Jeremy next to him.
I could barely see the Moon through the docking hatch window but the iPhone was the perfect size to catch the view…this is uncropped, uncut with 8x zoom which is quite comparable to the view of the human eye. Enjoy.
we as software engineers are becoming beholden to a handful of well funded corportations. while they are our "friends" now, that may change due to incentives. i'm very uncomfortable with that.
i believe we need to band together as a community and create a public, free to use repository of real-world (coding) agent sessions/traces. I want small labs, startups, and tinkerers to have access to the same data the big folks currently gobble up from all of us. So we, as a community, can do what e.g. Cursor does below, and take back a little bit of control again.
Who's with me?
https://t.co/PmRz0vURni
Using OpenClaw is basically is like driving your own Ferrari (that you have to be a mechanic for yourself) and it's broken down all the time, but gives you the time of your life
vs driving a reliable Honda (Hermes Agent)
vs riding the bus (Claude / ChatGPT)
The meta in Jensen's argument: only two paths exist.
1. Withhold the chips and hope China stays slow. Jensen's point is that they won't.
2. Sell the chips and trust the US to evolve fast enough that selling becomes a non-issue. This is the winner's mindset — run your own race, don't watch who's behind you.
The "researchers will talk to each other" line was a throwaway under pressure, not the actual argument.