@oil_field_4life@PamKeithFL It’s convenient of them to leave off 2000 when only 104M votes were cast. It was a 16% increase from 2000 to 2004.
Similar to the 16% increase from 2016 to 2020.
@franklinisbored Unless you boycott OS, then they have no incentive to fix it. They still make money and can ignore the issue until they see revenue decline due to this lax security feature or required to pay the difference via a gov regulation. Flagging it just stops new complaints.
@nico__2k @dap_eth @ondograph11 @jumi2k @punk9059@opensea They said they are not a custodial wallet, rather a broker. They do not want the responsibility and until we stop buying on OS, they will continue to sell damaged goods. The other way could be treating new wallets with suspicion before buying it on OS.
@0xfoobar At least McAfee allows you to argue your case and allows the SHA2 to exist as long as you have a sensible case.
OS requires the first victim to get a notarized doc signed to release the image.
It’s more work to complain than work a deal with the new holder.
@DeFiDefenseLaw@punk6529 OS is avoiding it by only a flag and block.
OS allowed me to buy a stolen good before it was reported. After the purchase they put a block on it. They told me to sell it elsewhere and not on OS. All I got was a returned transaction fee & a black market NFT.
Super shady policy