@andysignore@YanaLukeman@SFFNY@vmmaloney@TainaBorrero AI: "When someone takes credit for or commandeers your hard work, the primary terms for this are plagiarism, intellectual property (IP) theft, or copyright infringement. In a corporate setting, it is often called credit theft or project hijacking."
@MegynKellyShow From AI Overview When someone takes credit for or commandeers your hard work, the primary terms for this are plagiarism, intellectual property (IP) theft, or copyright infringement. In a corporate setting, it is often called credit theft or project hijacking.
THE AUTHOR OF THE ACT SAYS @blakelively DOESN'T DESERVE THE FEES & DAMAGES
According to the author Section 47.1 should not apply to @blakelively because its protections hinge on factual determinations — namely, whether she acted without malice and had a reasonable basis for her statements. Those issues have not been decided by any trier of fact (the jury) and cannot simply be presumed resolved because a defamation claim was dismissed at the pleading stage.
Notably, this is essentially the same argument advanced by the Wayfarer Defendants 🤓🤓
#blakelively #justinbaldoni #livelyvsbaldoni
@DailyMail I hope he introduces something like a Baldoni Bill as a counterpoint for a plaintiff who speaks his truth that sh didn’t occur especially after the accusations or claims have been dismissed after discovery/ deposition phase, no? jmho
Oh she says she’s “shy” at the Met Gala…meanwhile everyone who have read the case says she’s a mean girl/bully. Another reason why she dropped the lawsuit because Kroger’s email specifically points out her interview in Sept, not a “smear” campaign by Justin Baldoni or what she call “digital violence”. Only one to blame is herself. She takes no accountability for her bad behavior, true narcissist.