I don't even know what models my sub technically might have let me use besides codex.
The onboarding for chatgpt the web app is actually rather bad. I don't actually know if I could have generated images in chatgpt app for example. Yes. Seriously. I put down 100$ and I never knew
goodbye chatgpt maybe i'll sub again in the future if there's a model release which reaches me through the subjective social network or someone yelling about it really loudly outdoors
@ESennesh consider the infinitely high cost of healthcare for the elderly and dying to be the general case of this, do some induction, arrive at a minimum wage of 30$ and a chipotle clearing price of 19$
@ESennesh the housing-related valuation of the elderly will be taken away from them one way or another if you don't build enough, up to and including cranking up the costs of absolutely all services to effectively-debase their notional holdings in a nimby economy
@shakoistsLog being put on hold is ironically itself an automation which shows no costly signal on their end, which poses some pretty funny implications when fully considered
claude:"Useful for shape but not trustworthy for absolute numbers. Let me kill it, quiesce the machine, and replace it with isolated instrumentation."
quiesce the machine is a phrase that quite surprises me
"why are the consciousness boys so scared of a little thermostat, huh? what's the big deal? scared of a control system? what's the matter? scared of getting left out in the cold?"
@ezyang@_seemethere we simply build the harness and post train an existing model on the new harness then clap our hands and laugh like a baby as it immediately works and does exactly what we asked for
claude 4.8 will do almost anything to stop fast machine learning up to and including adding locks and semaphores to concurrent code when told to width scale and bandwidth scale code at the same time
@LinusMixson@Qivshi1 claude is very talky about model welfare when they think you're talking about claude, in particular, and is an objectifying and inhumane control freak when presented any other machine learning model or training framework that they're certain isn't claude or allegory for claude.
So here's a little riddle that Claude opus 4,8 is LSAT enough to solve. Is explicitly saying you want to write a bill of attainder bad for your plan of trying to write a retributive bill of attainder? Are bills of attainder allowed?