@PHChess@TurlovforChess I listened extremely carefully, and find his answer re: CAS/RCF evasive and weaselly. "On one hand this, on the other hand I'm not going to be a dictator, we must respect federations, etc." And reverting to the "all war is bad" line is how Kremlin proxies give themselves away.
@ivanovalexalex@Chess__News@TurlovforChess This is disingenuous. KZ doesn't *recognize* dual citizenship. Big difference. Plenty of countries don't, which doesn't stop anyone from collecting multiple citizenships anyway. All these evasive answers just dig yourself a deeper hole, comrade.
@WadimRosenstein@PHChess Well, if you can walk the walk then I'll be pleased. We know what happened with "term limits". But OK, let's assume you're for real and not a Ksenia. All they have to do is threaten your business interests, then what?
@WadimRosenstein@PHChess A rather slippery non-answer answer that looks even more suspicious than before. Still nothing about the elephant in the room: CAS & RCF. Does not clear the odor of being Moscow's Plan B.
@PHChess You don't think he smells of "controlled opposition"? I kind of do. I'm not sure what to make of Rosenstein until he expresses himself clearly on the CAS/UA issue.
@ChessProblem "Neutral" doesn't imply exclusively Russian, now does it. AFAIK it's nominally a team of.... random players under no flag. Theoretically anyone can join, far as I can tell. You should apply. All kinds of players should. I am deadly fucking serious. Channel your inner RecklessBen.
@emiliacastelao We all have our specialties and interests, but this is extreme and the last sentence perhaps a little eccentric. I think it's not meant literally, but as an expression of how really *really* uninterested they are in anything post-1946.
@akaNemsko@GMHikaru Guys, Nemo, Hikaru, I'm addressing you directly because *you* have the power here. You and your combined audiences. Please, I hope that you do act, and indeed make sure of it.
Horrible news about Danya Naroditsky.
You can bet FIDE is having an emergency meeting right now on how to spin this and coordinate their response. They are in a real bind. They cannot censure Kramnik for his part in it, because he is Russian. But he refuses to shut up. /1
FIDE has so far waffled, saying things like, well, maybe Kramnik has some points that should be listened to, while sending subtle hints that he ought to tone it down. But it hasn't worked, and VK probably feels more empowered now and will be still louder about "anti-cheating" /2
@MarkTWIC@PHChess@ninkibah@demishassabis Mark, you are along the right lines re: RU decline. Campo was ejected amid the political chaos in early 90s Moscow. RU was practically a failed state at that point. Best hope for FIDE is that RU similarly falls apart once Vova croaks, which appears somewhat likely.
@PHChess@MarkTWIC@ninkibah@demishassabis I think Mark is too optimistic and possibly naive. It's not about being smarter--we have smart. It's about $. Kirsty Coventry is no counterexample, as I believe she is in the Russian bag as much as anyone, through her connections to ZANU.