Jeremiah Hernandez

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@donhynes @RichardGage_911 Let us know when the Dr actually submits a peer reviewed scientific study. Her book is full of speculation and guesses.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@ryan58957 @RichardGage_911 How do you pay for a venue in NYC if the tickets sre free?

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@ChefFuture17 @RichardGage_911 You’re experiencing cognitive dissonance. Seek help.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@cbrown2666 @MarioNawfal The debris was never tested for explosive residue. They admitted this already.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@Well_of_Truth @RichardGage_911 You know you’re a grifter when you show no evidence an office and jet fuel fires didn’t could bend steel like that?

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@EDunham57333 @RichardGage_911 Where is your proof?

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@thestinkeye @grok @RichardGage_911 Embers dont “smolder” at 1300F for 7 days.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@grok @thestinkeye @RichardGage_911 This is incorrect, as fires need a fuel source and oxygen to keep burning. Remove the oxygen and the fire dies. That’s why burying a campfire in dirt kills it.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@stator2025 @RichardGage_911 Clearly you’re not an expert at structural mechanics.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@DJtheDentist @RichardGage_911 Youre the dipshit, that thin piece of steel was put in a blast furnace. Thats much hotter than a jet fuel or office fire.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@ArieMoby @RichardGage_911 You definitely don’t have a degree in physics, chemistry or structural engineering…. Or you wouldn’t be saying that

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@ZygmuntStaszew1 @RichardGage_911 How does that account for the 90% of the building that was not on fire?

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

No common materials in the WTC towers or WTC7 (steel, concrete, aluminum cladding, office contents) would sustain Class D fires for a week. Significant quantities of reactive metals like magnesium weren't present.

USGS AVIRIS data from Sept 16 showed surface hot spots up to ~1300°F in debris. This matches prolonged smoldering of vast ordinary combustibles (paper, plastics, carpets, wood) insulated deep in the rubble pile. Oxygen and water penetration were limited, allowing fires to persist ~100 days.

Thermite produces rapid high heat but doesn't explain slow, sustained combustion over days. The observations fit conventional fire behavior in massive debris.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@ghostofgrandpa @RichardGage_911 If you are outsourcing your thinking to an AI bot, you already lost.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@Pio_Cat @RichardGage_911 Show me when that happened in a steel framed skyscraper outside of 9/11.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@EricE27 @RichardGage_911 We are talking about WTC Building 7, not the twin towers.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@ArcticHound @RichardGage_911 Thermite is finely ground and mixed aluminum POWDER and iron oxide POWDER. Not pieces of aluminum from an airplane. Not melted aluminum. Not rusted steel.

You cant take aluminum sheets, rusty steel, throw them in a fire and come out with thermite.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@tmacnam @RichardGage_911 That planes take the blame.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@SamWhitake77290 @RichardGage_911 Air pressure does not create large flashes of light. Explosions do.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@emrai62 @RichardGage_911 It would have never fallen without those preplaced explosives.

[Jeremiah Hernandez @scienceobsessed]

@wellhyper @RichardGage_911 Umm no - that large and extremely bright one at the end is definitely not a “flicker of light”.