Wow, the exodus from X -> Bsky is taking off like never before! So many cool new starter packs. I made one for cognitive neuroscience accounts! https://t.co/zPsNjVOLzz
@JacquesPesnot and I are very happy to share this paper. https://t.co/VNJpegYhWn. Building on work by @scychan_brains we show that human in-context and in-weight learning vary with the distributional properties of the training data in a very similar way to transformer networks.
Our paper on the Affective Gradient Hypothesis is now out on @TrendsCognSci! 🧠
➡️https://t.co/06U46A3Pn3
For a short summary of how this theory originated and what it proposes, see this 🧵: https://t.co/FCUjV8K3Nw
Super excited this one is officially out! How/when can we suppress the urge to look at and attend to salient distracting information?
Check out Han's thread for an explainer!
"The temporal dynamics of visual attention" in JEP: General
✨Rethinking reinforcement learning: the interoceptive origins of reward
https://t.co/2PngCYVppN
An honour and *absolute delight* bouncing ideas with these brilliant women: @debyeeneuro@danamsmall@rikepetzschner
What are primary reward signals and where do they come from?
Before you write a review of a paper in which you say "It's mostly meh" (a direct quote), stop to consider that you might be talking to a grad student who spent years on the project and is now internalizing the social norms of their profession.
Excited that the preprint for the work from my first two years of PhD at @summerfieldlab is out! In this work, we examine the role of action prediction errors (APEs) in cognitive control: https://t.co/F5tF4NhkvN (1/4)
I’m recruiting PhD students for my (soon-to-launch) lab at Boston University! If you’re interested in the intersection of computation, learning, & development, please reach out. I’ll be at #Flux2024 and #SNE2024 and am happy to meet up.
https://t.co/1qcQ3o1zRD
We have a new preprint with @kazuhi_s_ , Takahiro Nishio, and @BadreLab! “Practice Reshapes the Geometry and Dynamics of Task-tailored Representations.” https://t.co/DXj7G8JpAl
Of course, there’s much more to unpack than 500-word commentary formats allow, and I may come across more confident on paper and tweets than I am in reality. Therefore, always happy to discuss further in a conference hall or other meeting, and learn where I might be wrong! (7/7)
I've been recommending this review by @EgnerLab to many: https://t.co/6ARx0hNvS6. It's a great overview on task control research, summarizing several interesting insights! However, w/ Gesine Dreisbach and @smusslick, we disagreed with one conclusion: https://t.co/s42obaUbSx (1/7)
Also worth noting that at least 2 more papers called for similar ideas: https://t.co/J8iUEG70w9; https://t.co/ptBFQV2iIZ. They make important points, but I don't see the need to abandon the trade-off idea, which as the second paper notes is likely very task-specific. (6/7)
Very excited to share this preprint that's been a massive labor of love and provides a new "middle way" for studying multigenerational processes that compliment the control of a lab experiment 🔬 and the real-world validity of archaeological records🦴! https://t.co/kEma21VMmZ
For fans of *Cognitive Controversies* -> my comments on others’ comments on my opinion! TLDR: I propose to unyoke the constructs of cognitive stability and flexibility; others disagree; we argue politely...
Free read links:
https://t.co/qBxmyshiAC
https://t.co/gytB3fH0sX
Need a thrilling weekend reading recommendation? I might have just the thing for you!
👉https://t.co/19Jn9te1M4 Read the final paper @NatureHumBehav and don't skip the *peer review*!😱😱😱
Thanks to my brilliant collaborators @BenediktEhinger@NassarLab and @ShenhavLab !🧡🧡🧡