1/ Euler's technical whitepaper is live. excited to finally share this.
The claim is simple: robot data should not reach training just because it exists. It should prove it is ready.
We measured Euler on real teleoperation data, controlled faults, and ground truth.
Nice share, one takeaway here is that the bottleneck isn’t Claude’s reasoning, it’s the control interface. Once you let the model supervise a strong pretrained policy instead of wrestling raw joints, performance jumps dramatically. It’s the classic tools > raw-intelligence moment.
@gowthami_s The interesting challenges around simulators, and reward design def makes it fun. What’s the most enjoyable part for you so far? I’d be interested in any key lessons or tools you’ve found valuable.
Absolutely, and this is a huge opportunity to be that middleware that leverages the logistical prowess of vendors for collection, and can also can work with robot labs to actually steer the captured data towards more usability and training-readiness.
@ShreyaR It’s about time vendors adopt a forward-deployed model of sorts to actually know what kind of data to collect and render it usable from the client’s perspective, rather than just playing the logistics game and scaling up data-capture nobody wants.
@OfficialLoganK Can’t agree more and that’s what we are building, Euler does it for modalities beyond language and to solve the huge bottleneck in the Physical AI niche
@brandonguo There’s no rigorous QA process standards for data capture, which clearly makes it a low-hanging fruit for founders to grab onto.
Making existing data pipelines reliable and ready for training and optimising that for model performance is the real deal.
@livinoffwater How intense is the robotics/Physical-AI scene there when compared to other clusters like SF/Boston? Been wanting to come witness what’s unfolding in Shenzhen