@Aaron_porter Still not 100% satisfied with it. There's room for improvement. SEO is a black box for most people to begin with. Throwing 20 tools with in their face without guidance makes them give up so quickly.
@memoria_2024@tseringredmond@ahrefs@semrush If by βkeywords volumeβ you mean number of keywords, we havenβt had a case yet where ahrefs delivers significantly more keywords than us for a given seed π€
@orlandopedro@tseringredmond It's more focused on content strategy. We offer keyword research as well, but our key feature is automatic content strategy development with large scale SERP clustering.
Hello World!
We are seospark and we want to make it easy for you to create SEO content that gets you to rank #1 on Google.
We offer a simple but effective workflow that helps you every step of the way to your optimised content strategy:
Use the prebuilt clusters as an outline for your content. SERP overlap represents Google's view on the topic, so structuring your content that way boosts your Google rank automatically.
@digitalshane_@tseringredmond We donβt aim to replace ahrefs. Itβs a great tool with great features. 70% of ahrefs is overkill for most people though π. We focus much more on content strategy development, which involves keyword research. Itβs a different approach. ππΌ
@QuasiMotooo @yousof_dev@tseringredmond In general, we have found our keyword data to be as accurate as ahrefs'. There are a few cases where ahrefs relies on approximations for metrics like search volume, etc. We prefer to use live data from Google. For highly up-to-date topics, that's a good approach I think.
@Bobakanoosh1_ @tseringredmond I'll check the server logs to see if I can find any hiccups. Issues with loading the frontend are odd though, as that's just static pages served over CDN.