@MrCasey62 You're right about the natural birth reference being silly. But John 3:5 is also not a reference to (then) future Christian baptism, per se.
@RionInZion@ThoughtfulSaint So you don't accept the quote from your Prophet? You guys are always doing damage control for your doctrine. BTW, this bears zero resemblance to anything an accepted "church father" ever said. That is patently and demonstrably absurd.
Simple question, was Elohim ever a man?
@CatholicDrip___ Some beliefs are heavily influenced by the present culture. You could say something similar about..
The Divine Right of Kings and Church-State Coercion or Geocentric Cosmology.
Most reformers were convinced that the Pope was the Antichrist. Perhaps we should bring that back too.
@islam_et_media@etherXwave I think you mean "linguistic convention". English is not mathematics. As a student of languages you should understand the concept of contextual meaning.
And anyone that might be convinced by your "message" is already doomed.
God sent a man to save the people of this age.
Had non-Muslims accepted him, they’d have become morally strong. Alas! Ruled through blackmail & corruption, they’re being led to nuclear war.
Had Muslims joined him, they’d have been united, not destroyed.
https://t.co/9fVbWq5MsK
@JuniperSTEM@Xtopher_Uzo Cool. I have actually. So when was the rosary developed? Was it almost 2000 years ago? While we're on it and since you brought it up, when was the "actual text of the (Latin) Mass" developed?
@lovinqthelord "I want to let the world know that I don't care at all what you think. It's important to me to say that what you say is not important to me"