i swear the most effective way to get good at anything is to find comfort (or even joy) in not being good at it yet
(then many playful reps, but that's inevitable after step 1)
crying was shamed out of me growing up. i suppressed it altogether from age 13โ27
now i'm on a plane casually tearing up at toy story 5
life's a billion times better this way
feel your feelings bro
The issue is that abundance of resources was never the issue
We already had an abundance of resources after the industrial revolution, and arguably other times before that
People as a whole don't want to distribute them in a way where everyone gets plenty
@cgenco I hope you're right
And I'm working on it
Can we shift society as a whole in the abundance direction, instead of recreating the old pattern but bigger/worse
@cgenco I hope you're right
And I'm working on it
Can we shift society as a whole in the abundance direction, instead of recreating the old pattern but bigger/worse
I'm curious what will happen here on the individual level, and on the collective level. They're not necessarily the same
There are people like Pieter here who are taking the free time to be outside and be with loved ones and feel more contented than ever.
And there are others who are feeling the pressure to fill the extra time with more productivity and more grind and they are more stressed than ever.
In each case the productivity boost from AI is shining light on (and accelerating) the proclivity of each individual.
Does the world collectively have enough of the former type of person that society itself will orient around living more than grinding?
I'd love for the answer to be yes, but I predict it's no. I think many individuals will thrive, and it's my life mission to increase how many people this is true forโฆ but in the short term I don't see society as a whole taking this win; it would violate too many people's (subconscious) need for stress and discontentment and overwhelm.
I'm curious what will happen here on the individual level, and on the collective level. They're not necessarily the same
There are people like Pieter here who are taking the free time to be outside and be with loved ones and feel more contented than ever.
And there are others who are feeling the pressure to fill the extra time with more productivity and more grind and they are more stressed than ever.
In each case the productivity boost from AI is shining light on (and accelerating) the proclivity of each individual.
Does the world collectively have enough of the former type of person that society itself will orient around living more than grinding?
I'd love for the answer to be yes, but I predict it's no. I think many individuals will thrive, and it's my life mission to increase how many people this is true forโฆ but in the short term I don't see society as a whole taking this win; it would violate too many people's (subconscious) need for stress and discontentment and overwhelm.
Yes, I have so much time now
I honestly feel like we're entering a new time of leisure where people are just talking to their agents to steer the direction of our work, while they work in the background 24/7
Like @felixrieseberg did while building his new homepage literally on a bike ride while talking to Claude on iOS
I already kinda did this with scheduled cron jobs for years, my sites were almost fully automated, but I still had to add features or fix bugs sometimes, but now for a year or more that part is also fully automated by AI
So then we just have so much leisure time suddenly available, that we can spend time with the ppl we love, do more fun things, play games, work on our health/fitness, be outside more, etc.
Some of that freed up time now goes into new projects, but there's a certain level of creative expression for me where it's sufficient and I am starting more and more to see I am spending that way from a computer screen too, and prefer it that way
Maybe this is the new time where we can finally live not work, as it was predicted 96 years ago by Keynes. That prediction never really came to fruition though because the automation that was invented just moved the work up to higher level (like from making actual things to financial, managerial, administrative, etc.) and people chose to just consume more, so they had to work more again!
But maybe now is different though, it definitely feels different to me
@charlierward I've definitely fucked up some launches by optimistically validating
now I play almost the opposite, devil's advocate, assume it's a bad idea unless they can persuade me it's good
"why would you use this, can't you just use [competitor]?"
it's fascinating that the rise of all these robots is forcing us to adapt to something more human
you can't hack engagement any more
the one thing that's working is reverting back to true service and true relationship and true creativity
the best things imo
i'm excited
Every creator is feeling this, but no one is saying it:
A lot of the strategies that used to work for creators arenโt working anymore.
Itโs harder to get the same attention you used to.
And you have two options:
โ You can pack it up and quit
โ Or you can adapt, meet the moment, and keep going
For me, adapting means two things:
1.) Focus less on the outcome
2.) Change what Iโm optimizing for
Instead of focusing my attention on how many people see something, Iโm focusing my attention on the people who do.
Attention is harder to earn right now. But you can still make something worth paying attention to.