@Gammonisnasty@commontruth_@mattfle02898557 'Huge roots' is stretching credulity, particularly for the reasons I've just given.
I'd suggest the 'roots' are actually quite shallow. What's your point of reference? The 'English' have continuous settlement since the Mesolithic...
@Gammonisnasty@commontruth_@mattfle02898557 You can make your argument but it's no good lying. Pakistani settlement is around 70 years; because of spousal marriage from Pakistan, many are 1st or 2nd generation.
@aswren@Morwenstow9 I just don't understand the relevance. Why did the judge permit this? Comes across like a struggle session: is Nowak a racist or not. Who cares? It's not relevant.
@ChurchillMyths@aswren A better analogy would be when defence counsel would try to blackguard a (rape) victim (loose morals / rep as the town bike etc). I think the Courts barred that line of defence in the 80s... I view this as analogous to that...
@charliecolecc@Stix8886@NeilDotObrien I can't see anywhere in Neil's writing where he discusses prioritising / discriminating on the basis of 'group', which is what you need to do to address the demographic balance. (Expelling Somalis / immigrating Kiwis). Culturally, elites nowhere near that.
@dampierguy Not enough. Proscription, membership criminal offence, retrospective of 5 years. We've seen the videos of how these people operate. Punishment and determent
@dampierguy Chinese pop is tiny, but they out perform all other groups by an enormous margin. British Indians are roughly peers to English kids. (Current Indian migration isn't as heavily selected so I think that difference will fall, don't you think)?
@dampierguy Guy, thank you for pointing this out. If you look at conversion ratios for hard sciences or pass rates for Uni entry exams (like Step 1), then the only ethnic group that can compete with English kids are British Indians.
@WilliamClouston@technopopulist@epkaufm William, wouldn't that necessitate rebalancing the demography so the English pop is overwhelming majority? I also don't see much evidence of 'mixing' - last year, of live births, about 4% were White + Other. It also tends to trend negatively for SES...
@SimonPartridge@technopopulist Last year, 7% of live births were mixed. 4% were White + Other whilst 3% were Black + Brown. (Black + Brown higher per capita). NOTE - white includes White British + White Other. I suspect White Other higher per capita. Trend is towards separation imo.
@technopopulist@epkaufm Mike, aren't these terms just part & parcel of demographics anyway? Which groups live in a country; which groups don't (or shouldn't)? If you look, empirically, at the population spread, it seems pretty clear that lines of (ethnic) separation are emerging.
@technopopulist Both those terms are meaningless; if you look at the pop spread it's pretty clear the country is balkanising. It's a question of demography - which groups do you allow to settle; which groups do you remove. Nobody is taking this seriously.
@MarkJLittlewood Those terms are meaningless You need to look at the ethnic clustering of different groups (including English) London population collapse of English; Norfolk population explosion of English. The country is balkanising. Demography needs to be treated seriously.