One more thought about parasitic taxation and I'll head off for some exercising. What should be the maximal ceiling of your yearly income that the governments should be able to take? Is it 50%? 60%? 70%? 80%? 95%? What is the philosophical, moral, and ethical precept that guides your response? For example, if you were to say that a government must create equal wealth distribution across all citizens then the government could conceivably take 99.99% of a a very wealthy person's income to achieve that objective. So in your view, how much of your earnings does a government have a right to in a free society? I'm being genuine here. You don't need to insult me, attack me, etc. I'm interested in your responses.
NEW YORK CITY YOU LISTEN TO ME! IF YOU’RE NEAR SOME TRASH RIGHT NOW, ANY TYPE OF 24-HOUR TRASH, GO DISPOSE OF THE TRASH RIGHT NOW AND PUT YOUR HAND INSIDE THE OFFICIAL NYC BIN! YOUR TRASH IS OUR TRASH AS OF RIGHT NOW. CONGRATS KNICKS 💙🧡💙🧡💙🧡💙🧡💙🧡💙🧡
Becky Hammon: Knicks don't have a dude... you got to have a 1A dude
Perkins: They DO have that dude
Becky: Who?
Perkins: Jalen Brunson
Becky: He too small… If your best player is small, you're not winning... Steph Curry is the only dude
Very much looking forward to this era of the Knicks mattering being ushered in. Like….there’s a NBA team that plays at least 41 games every year at the world’s most famous arena. But the stench of terrible ownership took all the luster off that. Leon Rose you are miracle worker