SORRY IF THIS OFFENDS GROCERY EXECUTIVES, BUT I’M DONE.
I just pulled a $4.99 box of cereal off the shelf, brought it to the register, and watched the scanner ring it up as $7.49.
When I told the cashier, she said: "Oh, that’s the digital coupon price. You have to download our store app, create an account, search for the item, and clip the digital coupon before scanning."
ABSOLUTELY NOT.
You inflated the shelf price by 50%, locked the normal price behind an app, and forced me to hand over my personal phone data and email just to pay the actual retail value of a box of food?
Stop hiding basic shelf pricing behind data-harvesting apps.
I have NP with Nick Shirley being rewarded by Trump for exposing the fraud in (MN) and elsewhere
But, what about David Hoch, he initiated the contact by reaching out to Shirley bc he had a large following on Social media
His family disowned him for exposing this fraud... but that didn't stop him, he and Nick did what no one else had the courage to do
Now, he's about to post videos of the fraud in charter schools in Minnesota, where tens of millions of dollars are being spent by the govt on it, and the children aren't learning anything
@realDonaldTrump@JDVance should consider compensation for Hoch as well
He provided all of the leads, he and Nick set out to expose... they did all of it w-o ever thinking one day they might be compensated
But, Hoch has yet to be rewarded for his sacrifice... I think it's he was...
HEY @IngrahamAngle!
If you are going to report on the ongoing Democrat Color Revolution, howzabout having the decency to mention the patriots who uncovered the story and did all the leg work, i.e.: @DataRepublican, @SKDoubleDub33, and @iamlisalogan?
It's common courtesy.😡
By the way @JessicaTarlov, I don't believe that you've ever had a conversation with @realdonaldtrump, and yet you seem to judge him harshly, no? I also have never met Ted Bundy but I can judge his actions appropriately. The idea that you and I must meet in order for me to judge your astounding imbecility is the epitome of your lack of critical thinking abilities. I watch you on @TheFive and I'm able to evaluate your positions. There is this thing called the prefrontal cortex that allows us to engage in this wondrous feat without having to meet one another. You did it daily on @thefive.
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
Now the truth finally comes out that the state of New York wants the Amish people‘s properties and land so they can build their data centers. How disgusting 🤮
 The Amish of Central New York told the seditious Governor Kathy Hochul they would pack up, abandon their farms and leave if the Governor tried forcing vaccines on their children. The Governor fined them over $100,000 and demanded they comply anyway.
When the Amish decided to fight back, taking the wicked Governor to court, Hochul's minion Senator Fahy drew up even more legislation to pressure them to leave, attacking their children again, this time through an anti-homeschooling bill.
Tens of thousands of acres of cleared Amish farmland are at stake. The Amish have spent decades clearing their land by hand and horse. The hard work has been done.
But if the Governor has her way, the Amish will be forced to sell that cleared land to the solar farms and data centers knocking on the doors for it.
Who will help the Amish stand up to this maniacal Governor? We need to expose this on social media and we need to get the right people involved to represent the Amish and help them fight This evil demonic power and control of New York. 
Vote No on Question 3
Question 3 would replace Massachusetts party primaries with a single “all-party” or top-two primary. Every candidate would appear on one ballot. Only the top two vote-getters would advance to November, even if they belong to the same party.This proposed change is a solution looking for a problem that does not exist—especially for unenrolled voters.
● Unenrolled voters already have the right to participate in Massachusetts primaries. They simply choose a Democratic or Republican ballot on primary day.
● They can vote in the race that matters most in their community without joining a party.
● Voters could be disenfranchised negatively impacting turnout and distorting the will of the people on ballot questions.
● Question 3 does not give unenrolled voters a new right. It takes away a system they already use and understand.
The proposed top-two system would weaken parties and shrink real choice.
● Parties exist so voters can choose between distinct political philosophies. Question 3 removes their ability to nominate their own candidates to run in the general election.
● In a heavily partisan state, the two highest finishers would often both be of one party. Third party candidates and many independents would be shut out of the general election—the contest that draws the most voters.
● November ballots would offer less ideological diversity when turnout and attention are highest.
On May 4, 2026 The MA State House of Representatives - Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions- voted to TAKE NO ACTION on H.5003, Initiative Petition for a Law to Implement to All-Party State Primaries. TAKING NO ACTION ON A BILL LETS IT FAIL WITHOUT A RECORDED “NO” VOTE. The majority opinion based their opinion on “administrative and fiscal implications of implementing the proposal at both the state and municipal levels, as well as concerns that all-party primaries may result in vote splitting,reduced party accountability, voter confusion, and strategic voting, often disadvantaging less-funded candidates and producing unpredictable or unrepresentative outcomes”
THE PROPOSED LAW THAT FAILED IS NOW QUESTION 3 ON THE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT.
VOTE NO ON QUESTION 3
It was very clear tonight she has no plans for fixing MA, other than blame others. Trump wasn’t on the stage. Trump is not running against her. She has a bucket full of failures. As they say, people are elevated to their own level of incompetence! She’s passed her level.
Minogue's media presence has gotten much better over the months. He did very well today. I would've liked if he tied bad outcomes directly to Healey a bit more, but overall he WON.
Healey speaks in platitudes and was clearly flustered. She knows she has an untenable record, insofar that defending it is a seriously difficult task.
VOTE MINOGUE!
They don’t want people to watch, because they know what the reaction will be when she falls flat on her face. It’s a good thing I saw your post otherwise I would’ve known a debate as scheduled. Hey Boston Western MA is still part of the state. We have to stream it.
TONIGHT: America, please join Massachusetts in watching their incompetent Governor Maura Healey get clobbered in a debate against Mike Minogue. 5:30pm EST on WBZ.
Dear Scott Kirby, CEO of United Airlines and,
UNITED BOARD OF DIRECTORS;
• Edward “Ted” Philip — Chairman
• Brett Hart — President
• Michael Leskinen — CFO
• Rosalind Brewer
• Michelle Freyre
• Matthew Friend
• Barney Harford
• Michele Hooper
• Walter Isaacson
• Edward Shapiro
• Laysha Ward
• James Whitehurst
That Mr. Kirby is still CEO of United Airlines after he ‘pledged’ to make your airlines less safe by hiring ‘diverse new pilots’ instead of the most qualified pilots says that you and the United Board of Directors are dangerously putting passengers at risk!
Even more concerning is Mr. Kirby’s inaction, and United Airlines Board members inaction, NOT firing PRO- HAMAS TERRORIST PILOT IBRAHIM R MOSSALLAM is despicable, racist, and disgusting and another DANGER to United passengers.
I will no longer fly United Airlines and I ask that MY FOLLOWERS NO LONGER FLY UNITED AIRLINES and that they RETWEET THIS FAR AND WIDE!
Sincerely,
Rob Schneider
Former Customer of United Airlines
I was at a bar in Martha’s Vineyard and a Muslim was abusing some young women who were trying to get a drink at the bar. He was cutting in front of the girls and me a white American.
I’m 62 230 pounds and I was having none of it
I told the Muslim he wasn’t in his shit hole country anymore and to get at the back of the line.
The girls were really thankful and couldn’t believe that someone spoke up for them.
We need to do this every day to the Muslim scum.
Can I get a Yeehaw?
Sacramento’s been one-party for 16 years, so now they tell you how to live, what car to drive, even what tires to put on it. Becerra’s been in that machine for 36 years.
California’s soul is freedom, not a nanny state: first $150K tax-free, $3 gas, your state back.
WAKE UP CALIFORNIA and vote for CHANGE.
CLAIM: Healey said, " I just gave a rebate of 25% on people's energy bills."
FALSE: Editorial: Healey's energy bill 'help' comes with a catch Boston Herald .
The “rate deferrals” will have to be paid back. This is not a savings at all, it is a zero interest loan that Healey used as a gimmick for her State of the State address. Another lie.
CLAIM: Healey said in February, "100 thousand housing starts under my administration."
FALSE: Massachusetts is second worse according to the https://t.co/BWILYlgxBq Report Card, and does not hit those numbers even if she included Charlie Bakers numbers.
Ask Mike Urban, he documented it all for two hours breaking down the numbers.
CLAIM: Healey said, "We tried to be really fiscally responsible here. "
FALSE: 63.4 Billion dollars, 3.9% increase and NO VETOES. - GBH
No vetoes? In a state where they find fraud every other week?