@Rotary_9K@luongas@SissyDenverita@kirawontmiss Why that's a good thing? If you want to train your back you will use your back, you can choose whichever technique, depends on your goal, the count should not matter
@luongas@SissyDenverita@kirawontmiss That's not true, the wide arms requires more strength from the shoulder, closer arms requires more strength from the biceps/triceps. Which one is harder? Depends on what you are strong at, but I believe in most people, their biceps are much more stronger therefore wide harder.
@XelaRmcf @MaikRSH@isyouwiLin@fiago7 people can debate about MOTM of the final, but mbappe was even close to POTT, it was by HUGE gap, 1 excellent final and 2 good games can't be compared to messi's phenominal performances in the knockout-stage
@XelaRmcf @isyouwiLin@fiago7 So he did win POTT as top scorer and top assister, right? And you forgot chile and ecuador. What about top assister in 2015 and 2016? Messi won all POTT fair and square, something ronaldo can only dream about
@XelaRmcf @isyouwiLin@fiago7 Messi won POTT for all Copa campaigns beside 2019, not even ronaldo fans can deny messi unbelievable impact in copa 2021, but yeah cause I'm losing an argument I'm making stuff up
@XelaRmcf @isyouwiLin@fiago7 "Messi can legit ghost in every team he plays in and still be carried" well but he did not, and ronaldo DID GHOST for Portugal
@XelaRmcf @isyouwiLin@fiago7 So you are saying ronaldo was the vital part in portugal when he did not win a single POTT, was never crucial in the team only major trophy win (EURO 16)? He actually held them back in 2022, performed horribly in many tournaments, and you say portugal is a great team bc of him?
@toyancsayan@alkimiadev@MFarajtabar@GaryMarcus I disagree tho, tools, agents collab, ... won't fix the problem. Tools can fix the problem of precision in AI, seperating into agents fixes the problem of memory, scalability and interpretability in AI, ... Those problems have known solutions, this one hasn't had though
@toyancsayan@alkimiadev@MFarajtabar@GaryMarcus They just pointed out problems with LLM+LRM there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, if we never criticize we will never get smth better. And none of the problems with LLM can be solved in weeks, it's not something that if we want to fix it we can fix it, it's an open problem
@alkimiadev@toyancsayan@MFarajtabar@GaryMarcus I think even "the better AI architecture" would still be a token predictor, just how it takes the context, how it progresses the context and how it decides the token, will be entirely different. The current one doesn't get better even when we train it more
@toyancsayan@alkimiadev@MFarajtabar@GaryMarcus The criticism in LLM has been pointed out by tons of researchers, tons of papers. We definitely need a new architecture if we want better AI than what we have now, because LLM has already hit the wall and won't go forward any further, we need to replace it entirely
@toyancsayan@MFarajtabar Claude 4 is just Claude 3.7 scaling up, with some minor improvements, it can't solve fundamental problems in LLM. Multi-agent collab wouldn't help not even a tiny bit. Human can solve this without tools and what does "Memory? A2A protocols? Retrieval?" even mean?