@CorneliaLake Pet peeve: Terry Smith is not and hasn’t been a value investor for a while. It might’ve been how he started (back when value help raised capital), and he might have marketed himself as such for a while after, but watching his portfolio since he got X’famous it’s clear he’s not
@HighyieldHarry That’s bit much. They were in the right place at the right time with the right skill sets, sure. Eisman and his fund back then were financial specialists. They have bad takes on tech, but calling the GFC CDS bet as lucky is a bad take itself
@Mr_Neutral_Man These things are pretty maintenance capex intensive right? Wouldn’t EBITDA be a bit problematic?
Agree this asset class is tough, it’s real estate but not really because so operationally intensive. Closest to a hotel but much more nuanced?
One of the things that makes @SpaceX so valuable is how valuable it is. The Cursor acquisition costs materially less in dilution because of SpaceX’s high valuation.
SpaceX’s ability to do economically, strategically, and technologically accretive acquisitions is an important component of its value.
There is enormous value inherent to a company with a high value particularly when it is controlled by an entrepreneur that the most talented people want to work for and partner with.
Value begets value.
Talent begets talent.
@willis_cap@CapitalObserver With construction cost inflation over the last few years, fiber build cost is probably north of $1500/passing. Then you still have connect cost AND you still have to find customers. $1.1k per passing, with most connected, AND an existing customer base is a much better alternative