@itsrapha83 In a technical sense, underexposed film out of a camera not made for wide-angle photography. My point and shoot film camera often produces images like this.
@Babygravy9 I've heard of a friend, and many other people, who when riding his motorcycle had a deer jump out right ahead of him. The general rule is if you're going faster than something like 70km/h you should speed up so you can cut right through the deer.
Photos of the aftermath are metal
@DrDinduMuffin@jeffknox55 Dude it isn't normal to dwell on those thoughts
Maybe an impulse of physical attraction but your brain has the capacity to refrain from lingering on that and compartmentalising those impulses so you remain faithful in thoughts and physically.
@Thrasymachus_II@berrysweetmum make. It is simply not possible and cannot be consistent to claim immorality. Claiming a lack of morals is counterculture and is inherently a stance of morality.
"I believe x, I live by y" Is a moral and faith claim.
@Thrasymachus_II@berrysweetmum It's not convenient. As humans you can't be devoid of belief systems and morals. If she were a scorpion then maybe, because she would lack the mental facilities to understand morals.
But humans, even psychopaths have belief systems and morals imbued upon every single choice we
@Thrasymachus_II@berrysweetmum within an internal belief system. She believes her personally disagreeing with moral universalism debunks it.
She has morals. It's her insisting upon her worldview as correct and claiming that everyone else who claims moral universalism is wrong. Her morals are immorality.
@Thrasymachus_II@berrysweetmum It's just incredibly shallow and one dimensional. Making the claim that you have no morals is not only genuinely impossible, but the only way to remain intellectually consistent with that train of thought would be to kill yourself. Also she's taking a stance which only stand
@esjesjesj@UltraMegaTrQn If rapes are targeted towards a white demographic of children, then a fair response would be to have a targeted minimisation of the demographic which conducted those crimes.
@esjesjesj 'Believe all women' vs 'racism'
Woke 2.0 has decided that not appearing racist no matter what trumps even the most heinous crimes against humanity.
If you even insinuated a few years ago that 250,000 rapes were illegitimately recorded you would have been shredded.
@Stephen_Fremel@SatsuGoku@PhaedrusIX@HenryEYES@Dexerto then I would say fair enough that is a perfectly fair stance to take which is also consistent.
But you're just advocating for extra pay for no reason other than future performance.
It's not 'fair' in any sense, and really it's just asking for handouts. She was paid a fairly.
@Stephen_Fremel@SatsuGoku@PhaedrusIX@HenryEYES@Dexerto The point isn't whether the company is near bankruptcy. If you didn't assume financial risk then you don't inherently deserve further financial compensation.
If you were advocating that they give back their pay to recoup losses on the shooting budget AND get paid after the fact
@triangledread@HenryEYES@Dexerto If the movie made 0 dollars no one would give back pay to pay off the debt either. It's not fair to assume no risk then take extra benefit after the fact.
It's not contractually obligated, unlike your work bonuses which are.
@Stephen_Fremel@SatsuGoku@PhaedrusIX@HenryEYES@Dexerto If the movie made 0 dollars and whoever financed the movie is in debt, should the people who made the movie be expected to return their pay?
This is the flip side to what you are advocating for.
It would only be fair if money is gained OR returned based on future performance.