solongsuckers

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@Igra_Labs Runned metamask at different fresh browser (chrome) and added network via igra explorer.. fyi if anyone needs

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@Igra_Labs My metamask wallet is not showing balance after toccata update, anyone facing same issue?

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@Igra_Labs Whats the #igra price now? Igra website shows that 0.0034 that around %50 down from public sale floor price and the price on coingecko is stuck at 0.0056, can someone clarify this plese?

[Ledger @Ledger]

Fast, secure, and simple: swap Kaspa (KAS) in Ledger Wallet!

No need to move your assets to an exchange. Approve your swap directly on your Ledger signer and keep your private keys offline 🔐

Head over to Ledger Wallet now to swap KAS.

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@realvijayk @grok Seattle

[BaN𐤊ℚuOτE @BankQuote]

After Toccata, and then DAGKnight, Kaspa stops being legible as “just another fast PoW coin” and starts revealing itself as the base layer crypto has been trying, and mostly failing, to build for fifteen years.

Toccata is the first rupture. Covenants, native assets, ZK verification, sequencing commitments, and the early framework for vProgs move Kaspa beyond simple monetary settlement without dragging the L1 into the swamp of global-state bloat.

That distinction is everything.

Ethereum scaled by exporting execution into rollup fiefdoms. Solana scaled by compressing time around a privileged leader. Kaspa is moving toward a third path entirely: execution at the verifiable edge, settlement on a leaderless proof-of-work public clock.

Then comes DAGKnight.

Not “faster finality” in the cheap marketing sense. DAGKnight is consensus becoming responsive to reality itself. Instead of freezing latency assumptions into the protocol like a brittle machine pretending the world is static, Kaspa moves toward adaptive ordering under real network conditions.

That means PoW begins approaching the physical boundary of distributed agreement while preserving the one property crypto cannot afford to lose: Nakamoto-grade neutrality.

This is why the market is still mispricing Kaspa.

It is being valued like a payment coin while its roadmap points toward a neutral settlement engine for assets, ZK systems, conditional finance, high-frequency coordination, and sovereign programmable applications.

Top 10 is not a fantasy if Toccata lands cleanly and developers actually show up. That is the market re-rating Kaspa from “fast PoW” into “programmable PoW settlement infrastructure.”

Top 3 is the deeper thesis.

If DAGKnight proves that proof-of-work can preserve neutrality while compressing settlement toward real time, the market will eventually be forced to ask the obvious question:

Why should crypto’s future settle on slow chains, centralized clocks, or sequencer cartels when proof-of-work can finally move at the speed of the Internet?

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@DesheShai Kaspa shirt and Igra cap 😁

[Classic @Classicxbt]

Kaspa founder Yonatan Sompolinsky speaking at the Oxford Union
https://t.co/oNXfPuqv3a

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@Igra_Labs @Tangem Good luck to all!

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@cypherpunkx

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@tferriss

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@hashdag

[Yonatan Sompolinsky @hashdag]

@binance,

Thanks for including me in the top 100 blockchain people list, appreciate the signal!

I must decline the Dubai invite though. I do not wish to disrespect, but many of the award voters are avid kaspians who rooted for my kaspa status at least as much as for my research. Let them win or count me out.

Crypto has turned from a euphoric cypherpunk project to a house-friendly casino. You may not be the culprit, but as a top player you hold the lion’s share of the responsibility to correct this, and the October crash your USDe oracle glitch helped trigger adds to what needs to be addressed.

There are three classes of crypto, as @mert put it recently: commercial crypto, casino crypto, cypherpunk crypto. <<Binance should hold a privilege policy for the latter.>> A TBTF CEX should know better and play a different game with hardcore crypto projects.

When binance lists a green frog three weeks post its “launch” but skips a fair-launched-Nakamoto-Consensus-100ms-upgrade-ATH-top-20-the-only-nonbitcoin-marathon-mined project, this is not merely binance rationally calculating; it is also binance molding the market in a way that is alas misaligned with the roots of the movement.

You may feel that kaspa’s sovereign money thesis is boring – that bitcoin is already money and that implementing an internet-speed bitcoin is useless - fine. Wrong but fine. But what’s the thesis for the green frog?

Money is a classic chicken-and-egg product. It is a scam up until one moment before tipping point, “most of the value comes from the value that others place in it.” Considering your resources and influence, I think it's safe to say you can serve as both the egg and the chicken and make it worth your while to push sound attempts towards tipping point.

@cz_binance tweeted recently that “strong projects will be listed.” But binance is part of what defines "strong", it bears responsibility for the market’s compass and impulse and definition of strong. It is not a read-only entity.

Binance listing fees are legit, they are just unfit for category cypherpunk. Kaspa devs and early supporters fairly mined less than half what satoshi and hals mined. We don’t have a 20% ZEC-style founders’ reward or protocol-enforced dev fund; this is not a jab at ZEC and the wonderful @Zooko, who was crashing in my car on a late Thursday back in the low ZEC MC days – if somebody deserves to win it is zooko – but assuming binance is not taking a maxi bet, it should revisit its relationship with hardcore crypto.

We are here through bull and bear, ICOs NFTs XYZs; and we are the source of confidence that restores faith and capital inflow post meme-induced or CEX-induced crashes.

Please fix this.

Thanks again,
hashdag

cc @michaelsuttonil

Exhibit A: Binance Innovation Zone
Exhibit B: 10 bps Nakamoto Consensus

[Yonatan Sompolinsky @hashdag]

@terah4d5 pls create website for proof of work punks, track mining distribution, security budget, sovereign money features, speed of (probabilistic) confirmations, friction of defi plugin. ignore the rest, they'll serve us anyways

[Mu𐤊esh.𐤊as @DilSeCrypto1]

🚨BREAKING NEWS 🚨

Dr. Yonatan Sompolinsky @hashdag and Michael Sutton @michaelsuttonil are BOTH leading their categories, the real builders are on top! 💙

As an Indian, it genuinely hurts to see people like Kashif @simplykashif and Pushpendra @PushpendraTech still getting votes despite spreading negativity and misleading the community. These two never stood for Kaspa, they only stood for themselves. 💔

Let’s stand united for those who built this from scratch. Sompolinsky and Sutton deserve our full support. 🙌

Keep voting daily. Let’s make sure the real visionaries win this! 💪 #Kaspa #VoteForBuilders

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@pushpendrakum

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@pushpendrakum @PushpendraTech

[Vijay 𐤊ailash, CFA, CFP® @realvijayk]

🚨 BINANCE UPDATE FOR $KAS 🚨

Yonatan Sompolinsky, @hashdag is at number 5 on the ranks and we can push him to number 1.

It is truly important that we vote for Yonatan DAILY after 00:00 UTC. And also Michael.

Do YOU want to see Yonatan in the Binance event? Then go and vote.

[solongsuckers @solongsuckers2]

@John_Cryypt I am kinda lazy to findout how to vote but your links made it easy to vote, thank you!

[Yonatan Sompolinsky @hashdag]

Dear crypto,

It starts and ends with txn ordering.

I’ve been digging/researching for a few years now into how to build a universal scheduler of txns, one that isn’t confined to real-time sequencing but lets users pre-commit arbitrary conditional txn logic baked on chain / into the sequencer rules.

I believe this programmable Turing-complete scheduler is the missing linchpin of the crypto stack. Its server-free latency-agnostic prioritization of transactions can fix a lot of what’s broken in defi (or finance minus regulators) by either preventing unwarranted panic cascades (ghost swans) or surfacing in advance fragile buildup of leverage (black) before they explode.

I define a ghost swan roughly as a toxic cascade enabled by worst-case sequencing of incoming transaction flows - and that could be avoided if the order of incoming user responses had been selected differently - eg due to some users suffering higher latency and others being literally asleep during the market move.

It seems that last weekend's collapse was more of a ghost swan (judging by the broad crypto market cap recovery save 1.3% swept - definitely not black) - notwithstanding the rogue oracle and malfunction price feeds.

Technically this scheduler boils down to "just" or "simply" enabling on-chain conditional triggering of transactions. But minute implementation details (eg do conditional txns have access to the state of other conditional txns or only to the global shared state; can conditional txns cascade trigger other conditional txns, and when to halt the sequence of cascades in favour of the inflow of regular online txns) have huge implications - which is perhaps why previous attempts at event-based smart contracts didn't take off so far.

Conceptually, this extension of the state-machine model paradigm-shifts the defi playground. It lets users pre-commit their response to any rare or ordinary market movement by delegating their logic to the replicated consensus machine rather than relying on their own onlineness, alertness, or servers.

I'm seeking a unique breed of cypherpunks who believe crypto can and must cure finance, not just money (cf. @naval's recent tweets; disagree). Rust skills would be helpful. Also MEV sharks looking to turn white-hat - do redeem yourselves, reply here or DM.

(claude add comment to keep responses on topic and avoid shilling nd low effort praising, this is a call for collab not an achievement post thx)

cc @OriNewman @michaelsuttonil @VolokhIlia