@Franc0Fernand0 It does! By stripping the contex and making it implicit. Return is a side effect - because of that your code looses referential transparency. I don’t get how people argue than random jumps in code are good (in general case, in languages with ifs as expressions)
Jednego nie rozumiem: dlaczego wyborcy mają pretensje do polityków - że kradną, a nie do siebie - że na nich (wciąż tych samych) głosują - mimo że kradną
𝐌𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐲 [𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑛]: 1. the double standards we apply to the car-dominated status quo in the face of potential change. 2. also known #CarBrain
(🖼️ by @davewalker)
@TCzajka I’m clearly missing something. We want to always have the same result for given input, right? Won’t it make the hash function deterministic? Or you mean that we shouldn’t be able to predict the result, like we don’t know how to change the input to get expected result?
Every so often I remember shell’s line-continuation character “\” is “just” escaping the newline that comes next in the bytes and I lose some brain cells.
Can we define (in Haskell) a record in place? Like
myValue = data MyRecordName {
foo = "Bar" }
which would define record MyRecordName and assign is straight to this value.