Sonia Folkner

[Brandon Joe Williams @BrandonJoe40008]

So many Americans are suddenly waking up right now and they are royally pissed.

But I would like to just point out that we have been failing to manage and control our government almost entirely for 150 years.

To me, how bad it's gotten isn't even that bad. I'm shocked it's even still here.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@BrandonJoe40008 Are you going to explain that here?

[Ken Colbert @KColbertReport]

INDIANA

You thought JD Vance came to Indiana for redistricting, silly boy.

Vance worked for Peter Thiel, the owner of Palantir.

Theil bankrolled Vance’s political career in Ohio and beyond.

Palantir, is the data harvesting end user for the Data Centers being construed in the US and particularly in Indiana. The Crane Naval Base has the contract with Palantir.

Who really is JD Vance and why was he in INDIANA?

@MicahBeckwith @LGMicahBeckwith @GovBraun @Jim_Banks @JayStarkeySen6 @AGToddRokita

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@USSupremeCourt is this correct?

[Hannibal999 @Hannibal9972485]

Totally FAKE ruling on OBSELET TECHNOLOGY 😆 and you kept the loopholes . This was all performance 🎭 . The ruling is not a benefit to the people . 🚨🚨FAKE WIN
Why?

The Supreme Court issued a ruling in June 2026 to protect a method of surveillance that Google effectively killed in July 2025. Google moved Location History data from the cloud to individual devices. This means Google can no longer respond to geofence warrants the way it did when Chatrie was caught in 2019. The technology the Court is "protecting" you from is already dead. 🚨🚨🚨

The Supreme Court issued a sweeping constitutional ruling to regulate a method of surveillance that the tech company already killed eleven months ago. 🚨⚠️ 🤦

The ruling protects nothing regarding the specific mechanism used against Chatrie. It is purely theoretical. By ruling on a "dead" technology, the Court removes all risk. They get to declare "Privacy Wins!" in the headlines without the messy business of actually stopping a single active investigation.

Not only this The Court refused to apply its ruling to the actual human being in the case. Okello Chatrie was sentenced to 141 months in prison. nearly twelve years for the bank robbery. The Court ruled that the police should have had a warrant but refused to say that the warrant they actually used was invalid.🚨🚨

The lower courts already ruled that the "good faith exception" applies. This means even if the police technically violated the Fourth Amendment, the evidence stays in court and the conviction stands because the officers relied on the warrant in "good faith.🚨🚨

The Supreme Court refused to disturb this. Chatrie stays in prison. The government keeps its conviction. The ruling changes absolutely nothing for the victim.
🚨🚨

This RULING SECRETLY PROTECTING GOOGLE, NOT YOU‼️‼️⚠️⚠️

The ruling protects Google's business model. Google wants to store your data on your phone to avoid government subpoenas. This ruling retroactively validates that strategy. It tells the government, "You cant force Google to be your surveillance agent." This protects Google's stock price and data monopoly. It does not protect your privacy. Google still tracks your every move. The ruling only stops the government from seeing that data without a warrant. Your privacy was violated by Google to create the data; the ruling just stops the government from buying it.

And here is the OTHER PART⚠️⚠️

The Court created a new rule that is designed to fail. By declaring geofence warrants require a warrant, they set a high bar. But by refusing to suppress the evidence in this case, they signaled to every police department in America: "Go ahead and use these warrants. If you get caught, just claim you acted in good faith. The courts will uphold the conviction."🚨🚨

This encourages law enforcement to use invasive dragnet surveillance because the risk of losing the case is near zero. If the worst punishment for violating the Constitution is that the conviction stands anyway, there is no deterrent.🚨🚨🚨
—-

The ruling is a lie. It claims to protect privacy while preserving a conviction obtained through a privacy violation. It claims to regulate technology while regulating a tool that no longer exists. It claims to defend the people while keeping a man in prison for a search that the Court admits was unconstitutional.
🚨🚨
The only people who benefit are the Justices, who get to look like privacy advocates on television, and the Government, which keeps its conviction and its roadmap for future surveillance.🚨🚨..

They are protecting the stability of the surveillance architecture, not the people.
If the Court had ruled that this was not a search, it would have exposed Google to endless subpoenas and destroyed the market for smartphone data. That hurts the economy.
If the Court had ruled that the evidence must be thrown out (rejecting the Good Faith Exception), it would have halted thousands of ongoing investigations. That hurts the State.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@burby_geek @scotus_wire You are not required to answer questions.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@debunkjunction @johnrockshomes Pretty sure many private businesses were destroyed. Many people died. Ray Epps wasn’t seen there, ( but maybe he was, think in that one!)

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@Ben_Inskeep And industrial use was considered a WAREHOUSE! Our county commissioners agreed it was a warehouse. Thanks for taking our part @Ben_Inskeep

[Ben Inskeep @Ben_Inskeep]

Too many local governments, like this case in Jefferson County, Indiana, are ignoring their constituents to approve harmful data centers without meaningful transparency or due dilligence https://t.co/9nmtVDtwmG

[Ben Inskeep @Ben_Inskeep]

🚨27 Public Interest Organizations Call on Indiana Local Governments to Enact Data Center Moratorium🚨

Moratoria are needed to allow adequate time for reasonable policies and regulations to be enacted that protect Hoosiers from harmful impacts of data centers.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@David09031960 @johnrockshomes Said Thomas Jefferson to George Washington.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@debunkjunction @johnrockshomes Do we the people own the capitol or do your “leaders”? Our servants work there. Who is Ray Eps to you?

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@KColbertReport @thejohnpiperpro Will you be sharing your affidavit online? A couple of us are going to send our servants notice in our town also.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@JarrinJackson Oh right it was Herod- still gov. And yes it turned the world right side up. Still turning people’s hearts. True benefit to man. Tech goes on with or without Christ, but God can use it for the apple of His eye. Thanks

[International Cyber Digest @IntCyberDigest]

Bodycam footage just came out of a farmer speaking against a planned data center, being handcuffed at a city council meeting for going a few seconds over the 3-minute public comment limit.

Darren Blanchard was speaking in Claremore, Oklahoma when two officers told him to leave, followed him to the front as he tried to hand documents to the council, and cuffed him as the crowd booed. He's charged with criminal trespass, a $200 offense, and is fighting it as retaliatory.

The case has become a marker for the wider fight over data center construction, where residents increasingly clash with developers over water, power, utility rates and farmland. Blanchard's sharpest point is about democracy itself: if attending a public meeting can get you cuffed, the chilling effect reaches well beyond one Oklahoma town.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@HealthRanger Jesus is the only one coming

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@JarrinJackson One Caesar tried to kill Him as a 2 yr old.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@JarrinJackson I’m not Amish although I have many Amish and ex Amish friends. Still no running water. That’s not for me! Do you think Caesar is responsible for changing the simple way that Jesus brought? Makes sense.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@RealDaveCares4u @JarrinJackson @rtflack7777 @GinaJo15 there must be a notice for this! About Google search queries and no presumption of innocence, everything g fine backwards. Check it out.

[Redacted @RedactedNews]

THE SURVEILLANCE STATE KILLED THE FIRST AND FOURTH AMENDMENTS

Since Edward Snowden and Thomas Drake exposed the U.S. government’s secret surveillance programs, many Americans hoped the system would be reined in. Instead, it has grown larger, more sophisticated, and more invasive.

Today, intelligence agencies possess industrial-scale capabilities to monitor Americans through legal loopholes, secret authorities, and technologies operating far beyond public scrutiny.

@Thomas_Drake1 joins us to discuss how these surveillance programs really work, how Big Tech provides government agencies access to user data through hidden backdoors, and why something as simple as a Google search can place an ordinary citizen under federal scrutiny.

[Sonia Folkner @sonia_folkner]

@KColbertReport I remember watching someone I presumed was from China hand Holcomb a large blue and white vase. I always wondered what was in it. Anyone remember that? I’ve even asked grok. Probably 2019-2020