@rgoodlaw Careful: "1w" means "more than one week, but less than two" from **today**, so if @KatiePhang quoted the post today, he didn't post on May 20.
@TylerMcBrien@qjurecic Could you say more? I read this as allowing jurors to disagree on the category of the object offense while agreeing on the existence of an object offense.
@jonathanvswan@emptywheel@nytimes@maggieNYT@charlie_savage This is beneath you, @jonathanvswan. You both make important contributions in your own ways, but the next time you consider accusing @emptywheel of lying, you should pause to reflect whether your ego is getting in the way of your ability to listen carefully to what she says.
@JasonAdams1717 @EdWhelanEPPC@gtconway3d@DavidLat Suppose an institution has made been engaging in outreach to try attract a more diverse student body than it currently has. Aggregate data would provide the institution with feedback on the effectiveness of their outreach effort.
@RetroCanada @gtconway3d@JustinFrankMD From the study itself: "Therefore, the central hypothesis of the study, that psychopaths have general difficulties with abstract thought, is not supported."
@RetroCanada @gtconway3d@JustinFrankMD This seems dangerously close to "they say...", at the very least since the study is almost 30 years old, is based on a sample of 45 subjects, and has no clear relationship to the current DSM.