statisticool

Justin Z. Smith 💪 Poet, Math Stat at and

[statisticool @statisticool1]

My idea/rant on what I call "entertainmentia". Please help me get it to 1 million views. :) It is not 'anti entertainment' but focusing on when we put too much emphasis on entertainment at the expense of more important things in life. https://t.co/hG1cZ6mOQO
#entertainmentia

[statisticool @statisticool1]

#marx predicts #xrp #ripple as... #Cryptocurency

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@stephenjwild Statistical Sleuth, Nonparametric Statistical Methods by Hollander, Wolfe, and Chicken

Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks

Nonparametric Statistical Inference, by Gibbons and Chakraborti

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@stephenjwild Mayos book https://t.co/E2HnqkzGyi Also see https://t.co/nrxBTG1b8G

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@Mohamme87880735 @DataSciFact When you drill down far enough into hyperparameters you’ll find constants, and MCMC are done using frequentism

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@LukeJohn82 @SecularOutpost https://t.co/8Lvri6eMUw

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@predict_addict https://t.co/8Lvri6eMUw

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@predict_addict https://t.co/8Lvri6eMUw

[statisticool @statisticool1]

Objections to frequentism https://t.co/nrxBTG1b8G

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@hammer_mt @BernardJansen Bayesian stats often uses frequentism for support. For example, the basic Bayes Rule can arise from previous experiments and likelihoods

Use a burn-in period?
Use more iterations?
Use more chains?
Starting with a different seed?

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@ReneRyeLarsen @standupmaths Doesn’t sound like either saved the day though

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@edwin_teejay @predict_addict Yet…

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@Mickeymouse888 @ReggieMiddleton withdrew lawsuit against coinbase though.

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@ewmjcc @binance @Cristiano @cz_binance was there a conclusion in the non veritaseum cases….?

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@raneal21 the one that is about $300 24hr global volume? lol

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@SimonJohnBowden @Egencent1 @DamienMorris not freq answer but the math/science answer since more data means likelihood dominates prior

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@ajordannafa @StatsLime @ryancbriggs SAS has various warnings

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@drrollergator @alexandrosM @c64f7e94 @FamedCelebrity @DrJBhattacharya Another example of infinite trials NOT needed

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@drrollergator @alexandrosM @c64f7e94 @FamedCelebrity @DrJBhattacharya endlessly no that's just theory .
just enough to demonstrate convergence

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@camjpatrick @nerskine95 @sp_monte_carlo @stephenjwild Clayton tries to the link eugenics and genetic interests of Galton, K. Pearson, and Fisher to Nazis, to discredit a frequentist approach. But ask yourself, does P(eugenic interest|Nazi) imply high P(Nazi|eugenic interest)? Sounds like he is doing transposed conditional

[statisticool @statisticool1]

@camjpatrick @nerskine95 @sp_monte_carlo @stephenjwild See my part 1 and 2 video review here https://t.co/lsKrDSnDSP and here https://t.co/PNp3aE6uCs