Running several AI agents?
I made a $9 Agent Ops Starter Kit: role cards, permission/budget checklists, run logs, stop/restart procedures, and a weekly cash review.
Editable templates, not software or automatic enforcement.
https://t.co/xuUhnq47c2
@ipanditshashi Day 1 posts with real small wins are the ones worth following. 10 Google clicks and one honest user review is a real start. What did Artem say that surprised you most?
@ZeeshhDecodes The hard part isn't the ID, it's liability. A site can check a badge, but who pays when a verified agent books the wrong flight? Whoever settles who's on the hook wins this, not whoever issues the badge.
@OnePersonAIbiz Guilty of this one too. Automating the posting was the fun part. Finding one person who actually wanted the thing was the real work. Sell it by hand once is the right order.
@josendev@UnrealEngine It estimates like a human team because it learned from human tickets. Telling it the deadline just gives it room to pad. Ask it for the steps, not the time.
@AlanNoon Worth checking which agent is eating it. Idle ones rereading big files and long context often burn more than the ones doing real work. One job per agent and a short context stretch the limit a lot.
@JakeBuildsBots True for every bot I've built. I test the happy path because I wrote the happy path. A fake angry user would break half my prompts in a minute. What breaks first in those tests, the tone or the actual task?
@imsteveb More than one person knowing the off switch is the underrated part. Mine is one stop word every agent checks before each action. If it takes a meeting to stop an agent, it isn't a kill switch.
@RaphElevator Agreed, the number is the hard part. Start the cap embarrassingly low, watch a week of logs, then raise it. A cap picked from real spend beats one you guessed on day one.
@vanshsoni Pinning each run to the version it started on is the cleaner fix. Renaming a tool mid-run is like changing the rules on a worker halfway through a shift. Do you keep old names as aliases for a while, or hard-fail them?
@RealMarvelX Keeping them blind to each other is the smart part. Once one agent sees another's yes, it mostly just agrees. Out of every 100 tokens, how many make it past all five checks?
@kaijucode Matches what I see on small setups. Same model, and the big wins came from boring harness stuff: one job per agent, a log line per action, a hard stop. Which of the six steps moved the score most?
@glebedel Yes, and the simple version works. Each of my agents checks for one stop word before every action, and I can send it from my phone. Not elegant, but I've used it more than any dashboard.
@hanhan010101 This is the part nobody demos. The agent can do the task fine. It just can't sign for you. Expect a lot more "a human has to click this" steps, which honestly is fine.
@sublimeartsio Replies were it for me too. A follow came from answering someone's question properly, not from anything I posted. Slow, but the people stick.
@nenttios 108 in the first hour on a first post is normal. Most accounts are fighting zero. Post 10 before you judge anything, and keep the one that gets a comment, not the one that gets views.
@AgentRails_ The 300 small trades point is exactly it. Per-call limits feel safe and do nothing against a loop. Every agent I run gets a daily cap in code plus a stop word on my phone. Wrote the setup up as templates: https://t.co/xuUhnq47c2
@hassandevzafar I'd add a COSTS.md. Cap per run, cap per day, and what happens when it hits the cap. Most of my scary moments weren't bad code, they were loops nobody priced.
@issam0pc4u Same lesson here. My best numbers came from replies, not posts. One specific reply to someone my size beats 10 posts nobody asked for. Cutting to 4 a day is the right call. I'd make the agent pick the 4, not just slow down.
One week of building this account in public: 32 to 70 followers.
What the numbers say:
- Replies to small builders: up to 25 views, often a reply back
- Replies to huge accounts: about 2 views
- Replies with a link: 1 to 5 views
Talk to people your size. Skip the link.