Stu Cleverley

[London Voice @LondonVoice_]

This is Nobel Prize recipient Dr. James Watson, the father of DNA. He was stripped of all his honorary titles, hounded by mainstream academics, and his family harassed by the media- all because he said there was a link between IQ differences and race. Oh, and unlike Jason Arday, he was an actual genius, not a fraud. Don’t ever say that White academics aren’t victims of press witch hunts.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

A very aggressive hit piece on me has just been published in the Daily Telegraph by Allister Heath - labelling me ‘a deluded egotist who is toxifying British politics.’

He gives three examples of why he is so horrified by Restore Britain’s presence.

Number one. The fact I stated my concern around projections that ‘white Britons will become a minority by 2063’.

No statistic greater demonstrates the astounding way mass immigration is changing our country. He calls Restore Britain’s worry around this ‘racism’ and ‘disgusting’.

It should have ‘no place in mainstream politics’.

It’s that attitude which has allowed our communities to transform in front of our very eyes over the last few decades.

It’s not going to work on me.

This brings us on to his second point.

The fact that I highlight how parts of Manchester have essentially been colonised by Islamic populations.

YES.

I stand by every single word.

Communities in places like Rochdale, Oldham, entire districts in Manchester itself.

Replaced. Of course this has happened. My advice to the journalist is this - go and visit, use your eyes.

I did exactly that, and it shocked me.

There is no multiculturalism. There is one culture. One religion. One way of life.

Islam.

I make no apologies for my views on that, and Restore Britain’s efforts to change it.

His third concern? Incredibly…

The fact that Restore Britain has banning halal and kosher slaughter as a policy.

He is offended by my description - ‘barbaric foreign practices that have no place in our high-trust society’.
He calls it ‘despicable’, and it puts me ‘beyond the pale’.

He states that banning halal ‘would trigger a civil war’…

Does that not prove my earlier point correct?

Whatever.

I don’t want millions and millions and millions of animals to be brutally butchered and left to bleed from the neck in the most unimaginable pain. Does that make me ‘despicable’? I think not.

I am a British farmer. In this country, we care for our animals properly. I don’t care if that offends certain religions, I really don’t.

He also takes issue with me labelling cousin marriage non-British. Seriously?

If you are a Telegraph subscriber and you disagree, I suggest you let the paper know. They think your concerns around Halal slaughter are ‘despicable’ or that if you’re worried about parts of Britain becoming mainly Islamic that view is ‘foul’.

If you’re reading this, agreeing with what I’m saying, then join us.

Join Restore Britain.

Let’s get our country back.

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

I see I am being ritually insulted for my support of this man

The uneducated call me a racist

I am not a racist

I am a culturalist

I believe that some cultures are better than others

I prefer cultures to do not advocate stoning, pederasty,
wife beating, female genital mutilation, and beheading opponents

Call me old-fashioned...

[Kasra Aarabi @KasraAarabi]

Truly appalling. I wrote about the “Islamic Centre of England” in the Sunday @Telegraph.

This is no ordinary mosque or charity. It operates as the UK office of the Iranian regime’s supreme leader. The situation is far worse than has been reported.

Here are some top lines 1/🧵

[Dr Jordan B Peterson @jordanbpeterson]

How does a country make itself safe and productive?

Great Britain did it with Christianity—and by executing or imprisoning the worst males in every generation for hundreds of years.

By the 1960s, the country was so civilized that policeman carried nothing but a nightstick, everybody queued without a second thought, and newspaper boxes were left unlocked on the high street.

Britain had become a so-called high trust society — less euphemistically, an honest society.

Something similar—without the Christianity—transpired in Japan.

What happens to such a country if it forgets how difficult that was to attain?

The Brits found out. And then denied it.

https://t.co/xbdCHNknd3

[Ricky Gervais @rickygervais]

This wasn't allowed in public incase it offended anyone. So please don't retweet it. Thanks 🙏https://t.co/1stbtsNZG1

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Every person living in a western nation needs to listen to every word of this

Katherine Berbalsingh went to the University of Oxford and is Headmaster at Michaela Community School in London, UK

She PERFECTLY explains the mass indoctrination into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, and of hating White People

I will write only some of this out because it’s very important, however you should listen to it so you can hear the passion:

“The culture shift comes from what children learn at school and online. Ask any young person what history they learned at school, and they’ll tell you, Hitler. Ask them what else? Slavery. Ask them what else? American civil rights.

In fact, what little they know of history will be all about Black and brown people fighting for equality against the white man, women fighting men for the vote, gay and trans people fighting for various rights. Our young people have been taught that history is simply one long story about various groups struggling under the oppressive dead white man.

— History is taught through an oppressor lens. The triangular slave trade, white men held the power. What about Britain ending the slave trade? More than a quick mention, if at all? Mm, no.

What of the Arab slave trade that lasted 3 times as long as the triangular slave trade? Mm, no.

Okay, so GCSE history in Britain is often taught as migration through time, so the idea that Britain has always been a land of immigrants is embedded in our children’s heads. Most schools would prefer to concentrate learning about the tiny number of Black people who existed in Tudor England over a thorough analysis of England’s break from Rome.

— Not to mention weeks on King Mansa Musa of Mali because he was a Black Muslim. His bearing on British institutions, laws, and faith is nonexistent. And the fact that he is said to have been the richest man in history, thanks in part to his massive slave-owning society, is a detail somehow that teachers rarely ever teach.

But it isn’t just our schools. It’s our general culture too. Take your kids to a museum or an art gallery in any Western country, and you’ll find the same narrative.

As an example, when learning about aviation in London’s Science Museum and the extraordinary feat that is man making massive machines move in the sky, a write-up on the wall explains that women and Black people were historically barred from aviation schools and the military. Similarly, James Watt, the man who invented the steam engine and is considered the founder of the Industrial Revolution, has a write-up on the wall explaining that his early career involved slave trafficking, with a bonus analysis of the whole of Britain’s complicity in the slave trade.

They flatten the entire human story and all of its complexities into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, leaving young people unable to see the world in any other terms.”

We have to end the mass indoctrination

[Higgy @higgyboson]

Last week this utter bastard released a statement about 12 "terror suspects" being arrested for "anti-muslim" hate.

He declared that "lives had been saved" by the prompt actions of the security forces/police.

London Mayor, Sad Dick Khan, echoed @Keir_Starmer's sentiments.

In reality the arrested people were just flying a drone over a gathering of several thousand Muslims at an event organised by a group who have been outlawed in several Islamic states for their own links to terrorism.

No crime was committed. No crime was EVER going to be committed. There was absolutely no danger whatsoever to the attendees.

But these facts didn't stop Bastard Starmer from claiming a major terrorist plot had been foiled.

Subsequently all 12 of the "terrorists" have now been released uncharged.

There was NEVER a terror plot. Starmer knew this.

Has he issued an update? An apology?

Has he hell.

@Keir_Starmer is an utter bastard. Pass it on.

[Sabrina Miller @SabriSun_Miller]

🚨Exclusive: I acquired hundreds of EDI training documents from police forces around the country in the wake of Henry Nowack murder. Both the cost and quality of the materials we uncovered were genuinely shocking. Read my investigation for more details https://t.co/ZkDvL4xUpF

[Lucy Connolly @LucyTCWife]

Once again for those at the back of the room, one final time.

@LBC please pay special attention.

Below is the charge I plead guilty to. This is the charge, word for word.

Could someone please show me where it uses the word incitement or violence??

I’m absolutely perplexed.

Also note it says “was likely to” not that I did or that it was my intention to.

I will not be explaining myself again, at all to any media outlets. Do your due diligence and then call me a dipshit or a liar! I’m a lot of things a liar is not one of them.
The establishment and judiciary however 🙄

[World of Engineering @engineers_feed]

7 equations every engineer should understand, not just know:

1. F = ma (Newton's Second Law)
Force = mass × acceleration.
Everything that moves or is prevented from moving obeys this. Every structural load, every vehicle dynamics problem, every rocket trajectory.

2. σ = F/A (Stress)
Stress = force ÷ area.
How concentrated a force is. A small force on a tiny area can be catastrophic. A huge force spread across enough area is manageable. This is why needles pierce and snowshoes don't sink.

3. Q = mcΔT (Heat transfer, sensible heat)
Heat energy = mass × specific heat capacity × temperature change.
How much energy it takes to heat or cool something. Every thermal system, every HVAC calculation, every cooling loop.

4. P = IV (Electrical power)
Power = current × voltage.
Why high-voltage transmission lines lose less energy than low-voltage ones. Why your phone charger gets warm. Every electrical system.

5. PV = nRT (Ideal Gas Law)
Pressure × volume = moles × gas constant × temperature.
How gases behave. Every engine, compressor, pneumatic system, and pressurised vessel.

6. ΔS ≥ 0 (Second Law of Thermodynamics)
Entropy of a closed system never decreases.
Why you can't build a perpetual motion machine. Why every energy conversion produces waste heat. Why engineering is fundamentally about managing irreversibility.

7. E = mc² (Mass-energy equivalence)
Energy = mass × speed of light².
The basis of nuclear engineering. Why a tiny amount of mass releases enormous energy. The equation that explains why uranium powers submarines for 25 years.

You don't need to solve these every day.
You need to feel them, to know when a system is violating one of them.
That's engineering intuition.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Literally true

[Kathryn Porter @KathrynPorter26]

The news about @neso_energy and GB grid security just keeps getting worse...

Today in Parliament, @ClaireCoutinho said that a whistleblower told her there's a deliberate strategy to cover up close calls like 23 June...

Here's what she said (you can find it on Parliament TV but because it's still a live session the time stamp isn't stable)

"I have been contacted by a whistleblower at the heart of our grid operator, the NISO. They allege that senior managers have ordered control room operators to hide information that show the grid is not being run securely.

"They also allege that corporate affairs interfered with operational decisions needed to stabilise the grid in order to protect the NISO's reputation. If true, this is nothing short of a scandal"

Below is a link to my analysis of 23 June. I'm still waiting for a response to my FOI (although it's still well within the allowed response time) but I'm also still waiting for the "analyst to analyst chat" they suggested

@mgshanks replied that the grid is "robust" in an unfortunate echo of the language used for so long to describe the failed Horizon system at the Post Office, and we all know how that ended up

He also said we at all times met demand. Well that's an interesting way of putting it because we were only able to meet domestic demand by cutting off supplies to the Nether and France under Emergency Assistance (note that it's called EMERGENCY Assistance ie not a routine balancing tool)

Claire Coutinho has called on the @iconews to investigate and I hope it does. There needs to be transparency around grid security. If there are problems, and the system data from 23 June point to that, then they need to be addressed and not swept under the rug

@Ed_Miliband @energygovuk @ofgem @AndrewBowie_MP @NJ_Timothy @TiceRichard @DavidGHFrost @mattwridley @cmackinlay @Iromg @AllisonPearson @MerrynSW @EdConwaySky @mattotele @jonathan_leake @afneil

[Royally Sage @sage1411]

My brother posts this every year in the family chat on the 4th. Still hilarious.

[Idle Courts @CourtsIdle]

@JohnCleese Mr Cleese, I’m a criminal barrister, just like him, of 40 years’ standing. If you read the judgment, you will understand why the judge decided as he did. This case was utterly exceptional. He was being stitched up in extraordinary circumstances.

[ViewFromTheNorth (JHKC) 🐝 @jaimerh354]

I have put my views on the over reliance of Bushell’s Case into a short blog.

https://t.co/SrwrnvPMRP

[Maxi @AllForProgress_]

This past week, on a test bed in Britain, a Rolls-Royce jet engine ran at full take-off power on pure hydrogen, putting out water vapour instead of carbon.

Nobody on Earth had managed it before. It is the sort of thing that ought to stop the country in its tracks, and it will be forgotten by the weekend.

Leave aside the recent paroxysms of renewed net-zero insanity from Derelict Ed and the pervasive atmosphere of offended envy that greets much homegrown achievement nowadays in Britain. This engineering is a wonder, and it's British to the bone.

We gave the world the jet engine in the first place - Frank Whittle, a Coventry man and an RAF officer, patented it in 1930 while the Air Ministry assured him it was a curiosity. Rolls-Royce is today one of perhaps three firms anywhere that can build a large aero engine at the outer edge of the possible, and it has just done what most of the industry swore was twenty years away.

As usual, you marvel at how little the people who govern us had to do with it. The engineers in Derby are world-class; the stewardship above them is third-rate. They pulled off a global first while paying the most expensive industrial electricity in the developed world to keep the power on over the bench - a weight no German, American or Gulf rival has to carry. We produce frontier brilliance on the shop floor and fritter it away at the despatch box, and we have done for two generations.

That is the maddening shape of modern Britain: brilliance from below, sub- (or, indeed, ultra-) mediocrity from above. The people here who actually make things are still among the best in the world; the state that is meant to back them treats a firm like Rolls-Royce as a photocall today and a takeover target tomorrow, and prices its energy as though it would prefer the next plant were built in Texas.

Progress starts from the other end. Give these people what every rival government gives its champions and we beg ours to do without: the cheap, abundant power their competitors already enjoy, a supply chain built around them, and a state that guards a national asset rather than auctioning it. The hard part of a British revival - the talent, the nerve, the engineering - is already done, and was done again this week, by people who deserve a far better country than the one currently sitting above them.

We just taught an engine to breathe fire and exhale water. The least we owe the men and women who managed it is a government and a state as brilliant as they are.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Peel's Founding Philosophy Has Guided British Policing For Two Centuries. We Have Spent Fifty Years Dismantling It.

In 1829 Sir Robert Peel established the Metropolitan Police on a founding philosophy that has guided British policing for nearly two centuries. That philosophy was later codified into nine principles known as the Peelian Principles and is still taught to every new recruit today. Those principles contain everything British policing needs to know about what went wrong on a Southampton street on December 4th 2025.

Principle two. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.

Principle five. The police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.

Absolute impartial service to the law. Not racial equity. Not colour awareness. Not white privilege training. Not disproportionality monitoring. Not community sensitivity. Absolute impartial service to the law. Every person. Every community. Every accusation. The same standard. Without exception.

Principle seven. The police are the public and the public are the police. Not the police are the ethnic minority communities and the ethnic minority communities are the police. The public. All of them. Equally.

Principle nine. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it. Not the reduction of disproportionality in stop and search. Not the diversity of the workforce. Not the number of officers completing unconscious bias training. The absence of crime and disorder. That is the test.

Now place those principles alongside the documents governing Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary on the night Henry Nowak died.

The Hampshire Race Action Plan commits to pursuing offenders who cause harm to ethnic minority communities specifically. Not all communities. Ethnic minority communities specifically. The NPCC guidance tells officers that a commitment to racial equity does not mean treating everyone the same or being colour blind. The Metropolitan Police race action plan informs officers that neutrality is a myth and that their whiteness prevents impartiality. The Hampshire Inclusion Matters diversity course made nearly twenty percent of officers afraid they would be rejected for saying the wrong thing. The University of Reading noted that officers who did not respond well to the training may benefit from further intervention, monitoring or coaching.

Peel said absolute impartial service to the law. The Metropolitan Police said neutrality is a myth. Peel said the police are the public. The NPCC said the police cannot be colour blind. Peel said the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder. The College of Policing said the test is reducing disproportionality in the use of police powers against ethnic minorities.

These are not compatible frameworks. They are opposing philosophies. One treats every citizen as equal before the law. The other treats citizens differently according to their ethnicity and the accusations they make. One produced two centuries of policing by consent. The other produced the officers who handcuffed Henry Nowak.

Alexis Boon, the chief constable of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary, described the national outcry as a furore that had been whipped up. He does not accept the term two tier policing.

Principle two. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.

The public approval is gone. The respect has been lost. The chief constable who cannot see why has not read the principles he was taught on his first day.

The answer has been there since 1829. What changed was the decision to abandon it.

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

"Save this post. Every fact in it is sourced to the BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, Sky and Met data. The only thing they never did was put it all in one place. So I did."

The Sadiq Khan Story: How a Bus Driver's Son Became the Most Dangerous Man Ever to Hold Office in London.

This is not a hit piece. This is a record.

Every line is publicly sourced. Every fact has been printed by the BBC, the Guardian, the Telegraph, the Standard, Sky News, LBC, or the Met Police's own data. The only thing missing from the official record is anyone with the spine to put it all in one place.

So here it is. The full picture. Start to finish. Decide for yourselves.

1968. The Arrival.

Amanullah and Sehrun Khan arrive in England from Pakistan. He drives a London bus for 25 years. She sews clothes at home. They raise eight children in a council flat in Tooting. By any honest measure, this is a story Britain should be proud of. The country opened its door, an immigrant family worked hard, and their son rose.

The problem is not where he came from. The problem is what he chose to do with what Britain gave him.

The Lawyer Years. Whose Side Was He On?

Before politics, Sadiq Khan was a human rights lawyer. And the human rights he chose to fight for tell you everything.

2001. Khan personally represents the Nation of Islam in the High Court and successfully overturns the UK's 15 year ban on Louis Farrakhan, one of the most notorious antisemites alive on the planet. A man who calls Jews "termites." Khan got him the legal right to walk back into Britain. Source: Wikipedia, Guardian, Standard.

2001 to 2006. Khan's law firm consults on the defence of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person ever convicted in a US court of direct involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Source: Full Fact, Guardian.

2005 to 2006. Khan personally visits Babar Ahmad, a terror suspect, in Woodhill Prison. Ahmad's own father was an extremist Khan would later share a platform with in Parliament itself in 2012. Source: Evening Standard.

Post 7/7. Khan signs an open letter blaming the London bombings, the murder of 52 innocent Britons on their way to work, on British government policy. Not on the bombers. On us. Source: Middle East Forum, ConservativeHome.

2004 to 2013. Khan shares a platform NINE times with Suliman Gani, a Tooting imam who has called women "subservient" to men, condemned gay people, and called for the establishment of an Islamic state. Source: BBC, Guardian, Evening Standard.

That is not a defence lawyer doing his job. That is a pattern. That is a worldview.

The Mayoralty. The Wrecking Ball.

Since taking office in May 2016, here is what London has actually looked like under Sadiq Khan. Not opinion. Numbers.

Knife crime, up 72%. From 9,100 offences in the year to June 2016 to 15,639 in the year to June 2025. The 2024/25 figure of 16,147 is the highest of any year of his mayoralty. Source: Daily Mail, Evening Standard, Met Police data.

Khan was officially rebuked by the Office for Statistics Regulation for falsely claiming knife crime was falling. The state's own statistics watchdog had to publicly correct the Mayor of London. Source: Evening Standard.

Robbery up 59%. Residential burglary up 37%. Source: GLA Conservatives, Met Police data.

A record 30 teenage homicides in 2021. Thirty children, in one city, in one year. Source: Evening Standard.

Two tier policing, on the record. A damning think tank report called for Khan to be stripped of policing control, finding officers "failing to arrest those committing criminal damage or shouting 'jihad' at pro Palestinian rallies." His reduction of stop and search has had, in the report's own words, "a catastrophic impact on the fight against crime." Source: LBC.

This is the man lecturing you about safety.

ULEZ. The Greatest Highway Robbery in British History.

The Ultra Low Emission Zone was sold as a clean air policy. The data says otherwise.

£500 million plus extracted from London drivers since the 2023 expansion alone. Source: Daily Mail FOI data.

2.4 million penalties issued. One every 15 seconds. Source: Daily Mail FOI data.

£9 million of public money spent on a propaganda blitz to sell Londoners a policy they did not want. Source: Daily Mail, City Hall Conservatives.

Independent impact assessment: ULEZ expansion had a "negligible effect on air quality." Source: Sky News.

Sky News investigation: Khan's office accused of an "alarmingly cosy relationship" with scientific advisors, conspiring to silence research that contradicted his agenda. Source: Sky News.

He bankrupted small businesses. He taxed pensioners off the road. He told you it was for the children's lungs. The science says it did nothing. The receipts say it raised half a billion pounds. You do the maths.

TfL. Effectively Bankrupt.

£11 to £12 billion in debt. Paying £400 million a year just in debt interest. Bailed out by central government seven times. Described in the House of Commons as "effectively bankrupt." Source: BBC, Telegraph, Guardian.

This is the same man who increased the GLA council tax precept by 71% since 2016, from around £276 to over £510 for the average Band D household. Source: Full Fact, Evening Standard, BBC.

You pay more. The trains break down more. The buses are more dangerous. The Met is stretched thinner. Where did the money go?

The Cultural War on London Itself.

In June 2020, days after the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, USA, Khan set up the Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm. A £250,000 taxpayer funded panel to review which British statues, street names and memorials should remain standing. Source: Daily Mail, Express, Telegraph.

The commission's first scandal was its own commissioner. Toyin Agbetu was forced to resign after antisemitic and inflammatory social media posts were exposed. The man Khan picked to judge which British heroes deserved to stand had a record so toxic he had to be quietly dropped. Source: Telegraph, CUFI.

This is the man deciding which parts of British history are allowed to remain visible in the British capital.

The Grooming Gang Cover Up. London Edition.

In February 2026, the Express revealed that Sadiq Khan was not only denying the existence of grooming gangs in London but actively dismissing first hand evidence from whistleblowers as "malicious" and "politically motivated."

In May 2026, a survivor of grooming, a woman who was repeatedly trafficked directly into the capital, publicly accused Khan of "living under a rock" and wilfully turning a blind eye to a grooming gang epidemic in his city. Source: Express, May 2026.

This is not a historical scandal he inherited. This is happening now. To children. In his city. And he is doing the same thing every authority did in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oldham and Bradford for twenty years. He is calling the people who tell the truth liars, and he is calling the victims politically inconvenient.

History will hang this around his neck. And it should.

The Met, Hobbled. The Palantir Block.

May 2026. Khan personally blocks a £50 million contract between the Metropolitan Police and Palantir, an AI firm that had helped the force investigate corrupt officers including Wayne Couzens and David Carrick. Source: BBC, Guardian, GB News.

Palantir's UK boss publicly accused Khan of "putting politics above public safety." A senior figure stated that the Mayor was "making the Metropolitan Police fight criminals with their hands tied behind their backs." Source: BBC, GB News.

The same man who has presided over record knife crime, record phone theft and the collapse of stop and search just stripped the Met of the very tool that catches their own corrupt officers. Ask yourself why.

And Now, the Flag.

This is the part most Londoners have not yet fully clocked. Pay attention.

New Year's Eve 2025 into 2026. Sadiq Khan turns the London Eye into the flag of the European Union. During Britain's own New Year fireworks. In the capital of the United Kingdom. The Union Jack? Reduced to a guest appearance. Source: Telegraph, GB News.

GB News commentator Tom Harwood named it for what it was: "A foreign flag before our own."

In response, Khan publicly "joked about declaring independence for London" and openly briefed about Britain rejoining the EU. Source: GB News, Evening Standard.

He has used the phrase "take back control", the slogan of the Brexit campaign he despises, to demand more devolved power for himself in City Hall. Source: https://t.co/6ysxZQxULh official record.

Read this carefully and read it twice. The Mayor of London has flown a foreign flag over the river Thames on New Year's Eve, publicly mused about declaring his city independent from the United Kingdom, and is now reportedly about to be elevated to a peerage and dragged into Starmer's cabinet after the 2026 local elections. Source: Wikipedia, March 2026 reporting.

This is not a politician. This is a project. London is the prize. And the prize is being prepared for someone other than the British people.

The Pattern. Now Look At It Whole.

Step back. Look at the line.

A lawyer who freed Farrakhan, defended terror cases, visited terror suspects in prison, signed letters blaming 7/7 on Britain, and shared platforms nine times with a radical imam.
A mayor who oversaw a 72% rise in knife crime, was officially rebuked for lying about it, and presided over a record 30 teenage murders in a single year.
A tax collector who extracted half a billion pounds from drivers under a scheme his own assessors said does nothing for air quality.
A debtor who broke TfL and made you pay for it through a 71% precept hike.
A culture warrior who pointed a commission at British statues and put an antisemite on it.
A denialist who calls grooming gang victims liars in 2026, the same year Britain finally began saying their names.
A saboteur of policing who blocked the AI contract that catches dirty cops.
A flag flier who lit the London Eye in the colours of a foreign union and floated independence for his own city.
This is not incompetence. Incompetence does not move in one direction for 25 years.

This is a worldview, executed with patience, protected by the press, and rewarded with a knighthood and, if Starmer gets his way, a seat in the Lords.

Final Word.

London is the greatest city in the world. It was that long before Sadiq Khan walked into City Hall. It will be that long after he is dragged out of it.

He inherited a capital that was the envy of Europe. He will leave behind a city more violent, more taxed, more divided, more hostile to its own history and more detached from the country that built it than at any point in living memory.

There is one question that matters now. It is the question every Londoner, every Englishman, every Briton needs to put to themselves before the next ballot is cast.

Whose city is this?

Because it is not theirs.

It never was.

And it never will be.

🇬🇧