Lucky Leopard 🐆

क्या करोगे जान कर?

[Shiv Aroor @ShivAroor]

Cannot make this up.

TMC leader Brahmanand Chakraborty found by police hiding under a pile of sarees in Howrah, not far from Kolkata.

Accused of taking “cut money” in exchange for govt housing scheme benefits.

[Radharamn Das राधारमण दास @RadharamnDas]

"I have NO PROBLEM if India is BROKEN into 7 pieces.”

One of the Cockroaches who is an Advocate practicing in Delhi. Huge huge foreign funding to break Bharat.

[Neeraj Atri @AtriNeeraj]

Coz that is a sure sign of her low IQ and high craving for validation.

[The Abhishek Tiwary Show @atsshow7]

ये हरामजादे अब अति कर चुके है हिंदू घृणा से सराबोर है।
इनको बंगाल वाला ट्रीटमेंट पूरे देश में देना होगा ।

[Hindutva Knight @HPhobiaWatch]

@pbhushan1 Babasaheb ka Samvidhan

[पाकीट तज्ञ @paakittadnya]

19 20 ka hi to farak hai.

[Alpakanya @Alpakanya]

Mohd Asif was arrested from the CJP protest site at Jantar Mantar for allegedly spitting in the shikanji he sold as "Jain Shikanji". Arfa can now cry how Muslims in India are constantly villainized and can't earn a respectful living.

[Trupti Garg @garg_trupti]

UBT is going to attend INDI Alliance virtually today..

Reason - आळस.. आळस.. आळस!!

[Simple Man साधा माणूस @SadhaMaanus]

डरा हुआ मुसलमान और कर भी क्या सकता है.... 👇😔

[Cardano - $ADA Army - India @AdaArmyIndia]

Hey @prasadvedpathak Calling a white line drawn by a Jain-majority locality "Jain Jihad" may be one of the most absurd examples of manufactured outrage in recent times.

Jains are among the most peaceful communities in the world, known for Ahimsa, vegetarianism, philanthropy, animal welfare, and strict non-violence. If a community whose core philosophy is to avoid harming even the smallest living beings can be accused of "Jihad" over a white line on a road, then the accusation says more about the accuser than the community.

What is becoming increasingly evident is a pattern: instead of addressing real issues, some influencers survive by constantly creating new controversies and new enemies. One day it is Gujaratis, another day North Indians, then Jains, and tomorrow someone else. Division has become content, and outrage has become a business model.

Mumbai's success was never built by one language, one caste, or one region. It was built collectively by Maharashtrians, Gujaratis, Jains, Marwaris, Sindhis, South Indians, North Indians, Parsis and countless others. Anyone repeatedly portraying fellow Indians as outsiders is playing with a dangerous fire.

The irony is that people who frequently lecture society about values, culture, and morality are often the first to blame society for every problem. There is always a new villain, a new conspiracy, a new target. Self-reflection is rare; sensationalism is constant.

The consequences of this rhetoric are serious. When people are continuously told that fellow Hindus from different regions are enemies, seeds of mistrust are planted. Regional hatred may generate engagement online, but in the real world it damages social harmony and weakens Hindu unity.

Criticize policies. Criticize politicians. Criticize institutions. But branding a peaceful Jain practice as "Jain Jihad" is not analysis—it is sensationalism. It does not strengthen Maharashtra or India. It merely creates another controversy for attention, views, and relevance.

History will remember those who united communities far more kindly than those who profited from dividing them. @paakittadnya @Core_punekar @manukumarjain @anamikamber @Vishnu_Jain1 @SandeepKrJainTS @SreenivasanJain @ocjain4 @LavanyaBallal @MPLodha @indiantweeter @AskAnshul @BefittingFacts

[Megh Updates 🚨™ @MeghUpdates]

Maharashtra govt demolishes famous Noori Masjid in Mira Bhayandar, Thane

The illegal structure had encroached on municipal land reserved for public use for over 20 years. The cleared plot will now be used for an art hall dedicated to Balasaheb Thackeray

[Comman Man @CommanMan777589]

Meet Saleem Khan from Mumbai

He has more than 80k followers and is actively engaged in Love Jihad .

Making reels with a Hindu Pandit girl and influencing other mulle’s

Telling you Maharashtra is doing most appeasement for mull@s

[मी भारतीय @Core_punekar]

जिहादी मुस्लिम जवळचे वाटायला लागले की आपलेच इथल्या मातीतले जैन नकोसे होतात

[Simple Man साधा माणूस @SadhaMaanus]

कॉकरोच जनता पार्टी के आंडदोलन में एक शांतिप्रिय आदमी मोहम्मद आसिफ़ अपनी थूक डाली हुई "जैन शिकंजी" बेच रहा था...

यानी वो जो 200 हिजड़े आये थे उन्होंने ये मुसलमान ने थूकी हुई जैन शिकंजी जरूर पी ली होगी 👍

बिचारे मोहम्मद आसिफ़ को पुलिस ने गिरफ़्तार किया है, देश का मुसलमान डरा है

[राजेंद्र बाबाजी राहाटे (राजा बाबू) @rajababu0904]

मुसलमान रस्त्यावर बकरे हलाल करू शकतात नमाज पठण करू शकतात कारण

वेडापाठक आणि @VeerArjey चा रस्त्यावर हलाला झालेला आहे

[Rachit Jain @rachitpjain]

Mr. Vedpathak,

What surprises many people is not that you raised a question, but the way you chose to raise it.

Before understanding the purpose behind the practice, you used the term "Jain Jihad" — a phrase that unfairly associates a peaceful religious tradition with something aggressive and hostile.

Later, in your own video, you acknowledged that Jainism is an achha dharam and deleted your earlier post.

If that is your genuine belief, then surely you can understand why many people found your original choice of words offensive and inappropriate.

The reality is quite simple.
• The white coating on the pathway was not damaging the society.
• It was not reducing property values.
• It was not blocking access to anyone.
• It was not taking away anyone's rights.
• The pathway remained open to every resident.
• In fact, such practices are followed at many temples and religious places across India, particularly where monks and devotees walk barefoot.
• The purpose is practical — white-coated surfaces remain cooler during intense summer heat and make barefoot walking more comfortable.

Most importantly, how does this negatively affect your life in any meaningful way?

Has your property value gone down because of it?
Has your quality of life suffered because of it?
The answer appears to be no.

Had you spent a few minutes researching the reason behind the practice, you would likely have found a satisfactory answer. Instead, a simple local matter was presented in a way that invited outrage and communal interpretation.

The monks you indirectly targeted are the same people who spend their lives practicing non-violence, renunciation, self-discipline, and compassion. They walk barefoot not for convenience, but as part of a centuries-old spiritual commitment. Whether one follows Jainism or not, such dedication deserves understanding and respect.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with asking questions. But when a question is framed using inflammatory language, it stops being a search for answers and starts looking like an attempt to provoke a reaction.

Everyone can make mistakes. The mature response is not just to delete a post, but to acknowledge that the term "Jain Jihad" was wrong, clarify the facts, and apologize to the community that was unfairly targeted.
#Jain
@prasadvedpathak

[Rachit Jain @rachitpjain]

Mr. Vedpathak,

You are highlighting the issue of the white line on social media. However, in your interview with the news channel, the society office bearers clearly stated that the decision was taken collectively during a committee meeting.

If you had concerns about the decision, they could have been raised in the appropriate forum with the society management. Unfortunately, instead of seeking clarity first, you chose to present the matter publicly in a manner that created unnecessary controversy.

What many people found objectionable was not the fact that you raised a concern, but the way it was raised. Using terms such as "Jain Jihad" was completely inappropriate and unfair. Such language wrongly associates a peaceful community and religious tradition with hostility, which naturally hurt the sentiments of many people.

Constructive dialogue is always welcome, but public discourse should be based on facts, context, and respectful language. Differences of opinion can be expressed without using inflammatory terms that divide communities and distort the actual issue.

A simple effort to understand the reasoning behind the practice before making such allegations could have led to a far more meaningful and respectful discussion.

Link of the news https://t.co/7HMxmyuqhU

@prasadvedpathak
@TanviSolanki_ @arpitsinger @fpjindia

[Singh Varun @singhvarun]

A white strip painted for barefoot walkers within the boundaries of a housing soceity has "sparked controversy" because one resident says he wasn't consulted.

Here's what the law actually says.
In a housing society, individual consent is not required. If the managing committee passes a decision in the general body with majority approval, and it doesn't violate the model by-laws, it can be implemented. Period.

The Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court reaffirmed this as recently as May 21, 2026 (Appeal No. 24 of 2026): the general body is the supreme authority.

The aggrieved resident had one job: to tell us whether this was discussed in the society meeting, whether the majority consented or dissented, and if he was in the minority, why he believed the decision violated the rules.

He didn't. Instead, he went viral, which he is entitled to, but...

If he genuinely believes the decision was unlawful, the correct route is a complaint to the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies so that it doesn't remain just a social media post and his campaign appears genuine..

By withholding every legally relevant fact, the complainant didn't raise a housing issue. He ran a clickbait campaign.

[शुभम कराड @shubham_9909]

माघारवर्धन सपकाळ तू काय पक्षाचा मालक नाही जो मला पक्षातून काढून टाकायला – शैलेश अग्रवाल.

जय जगत म्हणत गांधी टोपी घालून हा माघारवर्धन वर्धा जिल्ह्यात मटणाच्या पार्ट्या झोडायला जातो म्हणे 😭🤣

फुकट कार्यकर्त्यांकडून खात पित असेल मटण आणि देत असेल लालच तुला हे पद देऊ ते देऊ.
@INCHarshsapkal
@INCMaharashtra
@Dev_Fadnavis

[Prasad Wakte Patil @Prasadwakte]

अररर लै बेक्कार