@KFC_India Please close this grievance
@KFC_India has been at it for 3 days now and just beating Around the bush
It was a bad idea raising a grievance with @kfc@Swiggy or @zomato@zomatocare would have closed this issue on the next morning itself
/3
Putting bad emissions in a perspective, well an older ship's "avoidable" emissions per month are probably more than say 5000 cyclists in NL save in a year....
As I said earlier, achieving (Maritime) Green objectives is easy .....
@gl_pdva @GreensEFA@BasEickhout
Just chanced upon a newsclip showing @BasEickhout and then out of curiosity, I looked up your profile on X and LinkedIn.
Green agendas can't be met unless maritime "environmental violations are curtailed" - after all about 80-85% of all global trade is by sea..
Contd /2
@racheliacovone@cpgrabow@BAMBAMBPT /2
Each trans shipment (unloading at Jamaica and then reloading) costs atleast $30-40,000 per operation and it still was probably cheaper than any other option....
JA needs to be amended to suit the times - can't have a horsecart on an Interstate ....
@racheliacovone@cpgrabow@BAMBAMBPT Accepted, but still no reason NOT to challenge wrong (and likely expensive) Oil and Gas shipments as a minimum - probably the same when it comes to commodities shipped from mainland.
About 2-3 years ago I tracked Gas shipped to Jamaica first and then to Puerto Rico
/2
@stavridisj@JohnBerman@CNN A lot has changed, from a military perspective, since the drones - both air and water borne - are an integral part of the warfare play...
Innocent Seafarers are caught in the midst of all this and are literally getting punched from both sides...
@stavridisj@JohnBerman@CNN Did it really have to come to this Sir @stavridisj
Loaded at Basrah Oil Terminal back in 2003, with terminal's steel structure ripped by missile or rocket hits.
Coalition troops guarded the terminal and guys smoking in the proximity of huge oil pipes was a normal scene.
@WhiteHouse@WhiteHouse there should be no need of this actually
The U.S. already has legal authority to provide government war-risk insurance for shipping when commercial markets fail (46 U.S.C. Chapter 539).
@gCaptain Was there a need for this??
The U.S. already has legal authority to provide government war-risk insurance for shipping when commercial markets fail (46 U.S.C. Chapter 539).
@US_OGA@US_OGA what about the NOAA high handedness and seemingly deliberate damage to US Oil & Gas Industry, despite SCOTUS ruling on "Chevron Deference "??
Is @US_OGA doing something to challenge this NOAA seeming abuse of power??
Please DM to discuss separately