Dr. Suvidutt Sundaram

Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court | Co-Founder, Ōverrule AI | Founder, Outsay Legal | PhD (Law) | Polymath | 10K runner | Flâneur

[Dr. Suvidutt Sundaram @suvidutt]

Kerala govt put seditious charges on @RahulEaswar. In fact, the dictates of Kerala CM against Sabarimala temple is seditious on devotees across the world in all respect. What a man made disaster this Kerala govt is?

#SaveSabarimala
#ReadytoWait

[Naval Quotes @NavalQuotes247]

"10,000 iterations, not 10,000 hours"

@naval

[Bar and Bench @barandbench]

Bar Council of India has said that advocates who file AI-generated fake citations, fabricated quotations or non-existent judgments cannot escape professional liability by blaming technology.

Read here: https://t.co/YHJSHzblKD

[Bar and Bench @barandbench]

#BreakingNews
Lawyers can use AI if...Supreme Court releases draft regulations for use of AI in courts, invites inputs

Read here: https://t.co/LpgeWqRBWU

[Mind and Glory 🎖 @mindandglory]

Poor men borrow to consume. Smart men sacrifice to invest. One funds a lifestyle. One funds a legacy.

[Dr. Suvidutt Sundaram @suvidutt]

BATTLE OF TROY LOST

I filed this Habeas Corpus case and appeared for the Prince of Romance — a man who fought relentlessly for his love. But alas, his Helen herself refused to live with him, and that shattered everything.

[The New Indian Express @NewIndianXpress]

#SupremeCourt dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) concerning an interfaith live in relationship after the detenue personally appeared before the Court and stated that she did not wish to live with the petitioner.

@SuchitraMohant1
https://t.co/0r7Ebd07Do

[Dr. Suvidutt Sundaram @suvidutt]

Glad that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been pleased to allow the Review Petition filed by me for hearing in open Court and has issued notice in the matter.

[Bar and Bench @barandbench]

Supreme Court to decide validity of State control over Hindu temples in these 3 South States

Read here: https://t.co/1HuMIgNvOZ

[People For Dharma @People4Dharma]

We thank our advocates @jsaideepak & @suvidutt for their erudite presentation on rights of devotees with respect to their sampradaya (art 26) in this matter. We also thank the legal team of @indiccollective led by @trramesh & @SundaramurtiRa1 for their guidance. Swamy sharanam

[KCC Institutes @KCCinstitutes]

Modern law needs more than knowledge — it needs a mindset. ⚖️🔥
Quick Fire Talk with Dr. Suvidutt Sundaram (AOR, Supreme Court of India) at #NationalLawFestival 🎤
#lawstudents #supremecourtofindia #lawyerlife #legalcareer #futureoflaw #quickfire

[Dr. Suvidutt Sundaram @suvidutt]

Although appearing before a Bench led by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Justice Surya Kant, is part of my daily professional routine, this matter was particularly significant. It involved a seminal constitutional challenge with far-reaching implications for the structural design of the prosecution under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

I had the privilege of making submissions on behalf of my client, Mr. Subeesh P. S., a practising lawyer, challenging Sections 20(2)(a) and (b) of the Sanhita.

In my respectful view, the case raised a foundational question concerning the structural architecture of prosecution under the new criminal procedure regime. My submission was that permitting those who “are or have been” Sessions Judges to occupy executive-controlled prosecutorial posts disrupts functional autonomy and undermines the doctrine of separation of powers embodied in Articles 50 and 235 of the Constitution of India. The concern was never about individual competence, but about preserving institutional boundaries and safeguarding the independence necessary to guarantee a fair trial under Articles 14 and 21.

While the Court was not persuaded and dismissed the Writ Petition, I remain respectfully disappointed that the broader structural implications for separation of powers and prosecutorial autonomy did not find acceptance. Constitutional litigation often raises questions whose full implications unfold over time.

I am grateful to my client for the faith reposed in me and for the opportunity to assist the Court on an issue central to constitutional jurisprudence and criminal justice administration.

I also express my deep appreciation for Deepika Singh for her extensive research and meticulous drafting, and Disha Purii for her consistent assistance during client conferences.

#supremecourtofindia #bnss #prosecution #judges #criminaljustice

[Bar and Bench @barandbench]

Lawyer moves Supreme Court against BNSS provision allowing judges to head prosecution offices under State

report by @RitwikinCourt

https://t.co/KVk8ziLrZc

[Navalism @NavalismHQ]

"Be like family to your friends, a friend to strangers, and a stranger to your enemies."

@naval

[Mindset Machine  @mindsetmachine]

These are the best pieces of advice you’ll hear today.

[Nassim Nicholas Taleb's Wisdom @TalebWisdom]

"The general principle of antifragility: it is much better to do things you cannot explain than explain things you cannot do." - @nntaleb

[Lawrence Kitema @lawrencekitema]

When a fruit looks too ripe on the bush, don’t rush to pick it. Instead, ask the birds why they left it alone.

— African Proverb

[Noctara @rumilyrics]

We romanticize the stars, but forget the dark is what made them visible.

[philosophy for life @philosophy_life]

“Weak people revenge. Strong people forgive. Intelligent People Ignore.”

― Albert Einstein

[Naval @naval]

We live to reveal ourselves to ourselves.

[Mo Zarrinsadaf @MoZarrinsadaf]

Life happens to you. The story is up to you.

[Ankur Warikoo @warikoo]

Failure at a young age is data.
Not destiny.