@EdDaWord@Nnnppu6@timbot Depends on the company, but it is very rare in my experience to see L5 as terminal. Usually if you're terminal at L5 they push you out.
@brenhubr Is someone paying you people to shill or something? It's fine, Opus is just better in my experience for complex coding tasks. No amount of Twitter shilling will change that.
@stxrrdusk Why are you blaming everyone else that you refuse to get better at a game you've played for years? Why should the game be made easier for you specifically because you want to stagnate? Just watch a YouTube video or something it doesn't even take long to learn fundamentals
@bubbleboi When markets get so irrational that people fail to be able to come up with numbers to support their fantasy valuations, one must question whether those valuations should be trusted.
@thrialectics I believe he'd come to enjoy spinach due to classical conditioning, and he'd probably enjoy ice cream and his mother due to natural proclivities. I suspect the most important confounding factor is frequency.
@Dreckerr Why would you make a high skill floor option so overtuned that it's essentially the only option used in competitive? I'm pretty sure every competitive player would prefer a generic pump meta to an overpowered high skill floor option.
@tenobrus If these companies are guaranteed to appreciate, why is that not priced in? It's very kind of all these investors to trade dollars for pennies to mom and pop with no risk
@rokkbert@KaylaSa69813726@IsaacKing314 I would say if the grandmaster is taking you seriously, he would probably know at least 6 book moves for any opening and most traps for the position. To win in 6 moves meant you went for a probably risky trap and got lucky enough he didn't know it.
@rokkbert@KaylaSa69813726@IsaacKing314 Yes, but if you lose in 6 moves, it's not a sign that the other person is smart or good at chess. Generally, it means the person who lost made a very stupid mistake.