One of the biggest lies that was pushed upon the bitcoin community was that “bitcoin can’t scale without sacrificing decentralization”. I see people regurgitating this left and right. This was apparently a highly effective lie. This lie was pushed by corrupted developers who were paid by Big Banks to stifle Bitcoin. I know it sounds crazy, but it's true. You can see who paid their salaries here (read the entire thread and all supporting links/videos): https://t.co/sJAiTaPRgt This lie was spread intentionally through the use of mass censorship and social media engineering many years ago (much in the same manner that we see heavily employed today on topics such as world politics and health). You can read about this corruption of bitcoin development in the following thread (make sure to scroll down to read the full thread and read/watch all supporting links) here: https://t.co/sJAiTaPRgt The TRUTH is that bitcoin CAN scale, and could always scale, both today and 15 years ago. And if scaled correctly and intelligently, it does NOT lead to centralization in any pragmatically meaningful way. Decentralization is a balance of factors and is not an extreme black-or-white calculation, as the Bitcoin Core devs would have you believe. The devs want you to think that if bitcoin scales at all, then its decentralization is over. This is simply not true. There is a harmonious balance that can be struck. Satoshi himself was in favor of MASSIVE scaling and detailed this in numerous places. A new email recently surfaced from satoshi which makes this more clear than ever. It was uncovered in a court case (see image below). https://t.co/DJep8IuZ3k ———— To all those people who keep parroting the nonsense that "bitcoin can't scale because it would destroy decentralization", I urge you to consider this: There are MANY OPTIMIZATIONS (both that we’ve thought of and new ideas that can be developed) that reduce block size and database size. There are already a number of technologies that exist, such as “pruning”, SPV wallets, compression, and block propagation technologies. There are technologies such as “small blocks”, “thin blocks” and “xthin blocks”, which dramatically reduce bandwidth requirements through block propagation compression enhancements. These can reduce bandwidth by 1/10th or more. These are just SOME angles of optimization and are by no means a comprehensive list. This is in addition to the natural growth of technology of bandwidth, storage technology and computing power. These have increased at a tremendous rate over the past 15 years, and they will continue to do so. To those who reply in a defeatist manner that “Bitcoin CAN'T scale because it ruins decentralization”: Really, all such people are confessing to is a lack of creativity, a lack of technical understanding and a lack of willingness to try. They are the same sheep who believe anything the Core devs spoonfed them, in order to stop innovation and new scaling ideas, for ulterior reasons (again, see entire thread here: https://t.co/sJAiTaPRgt) If one simply had the attitude “how could we pull this off?”, they would then come to realize it IS possible to scale bitcoin on the base layer. Layer 2 scaling is fine too, but not at the detriment of the base layer. Layer 2 scaling also depends in a large part on a scalable layer 1. So, the next time you hear some flavor of "bitcoin scaling isn't possible because it harms decentralization", show them this thread, because what they are saying is a flat out lie. Satoshi didn’t have time to explain it to everyone and I see why.

If there is one thing that 9/11 and the Covid19 vaccines should have taught us, it's that the psychopathic oligarchy will either cause or allow highly visual massacres to occur in order to perpetrate their psychopathic agenda for control, destruction, war, and ultimately for depopulation. Psychopaths like to kill. See "American Psycho" by Brett Easton Ellis for a good portrayal.