@jennap0822 It really depends on how much an artist relies on different technologies. It could be argued the other way that some artists sound even better in person
@JK22168 I prefer live music for the same reason. Nothing can beat the excitement and atmosphere of going to see one of your favourite bands or artists live
I personally disagree with Wald's assessment. I would always rather live music as opposed to a recording. However, I understand how the use of autotune could take away from a live performance for artists who rely on it #S22POPMUS
@DevonTobin01 As long as proper credit was given to the original artists, I have no issue with "Schlock Rock" music. It was a big part of rock and roll history and therefore should be recognized.
@luff_miranda I agree it definitely shouldn't be dismissed. I like your last point as it is quite possible without schlock making rock and roll music accessible to more people, it might not have gained the popularity it eventually did
I don't think it is fair to completely discredit "schlock rock". It is still a form of music regardless of if it was just watered-down covers of popular rock music of the time. As long as credit was given to the original artists there should be no issues. #S22POPMUS
@DevonTobin01 Totally agree. Watch any live performance of Ray, and you can see the emotion he puts into his performance. I don't think he would have been able to engage as much with the audience without his unique vocal style
@trumanosmond23 Ray certainly was a trailblazer, combining the genres of R&B with gospel music and creating a unique sound that he could call his own. He also showed that an artist could be successful while doing something different than the rest of the industry
Ray Charles used a breaking voice to emphasize lyrics and convey his emotion. Additionally, I believe he used this to pay homage to his influences such as R&B and gospel music while carving out his own "soul-music" genre #S22POPMUS
@ian_pat_carroll I enjoy a lot of the social features Spotify has like being able to create a shared playlist with your friends, however, it's a bit intrusive having what you're listening to broadcast to your friends 24/7. Has definitely made me think twice about what I'm listening to before
@sarahmlamswood Sadly I agree. I think the headphones one uses to listen to music have become more of a status symbol than simply a means of listening to music. Quite unfortunate as some people prefer to use wired headphones instead of wireless and could be judged because of that.
I believe the rise of streaming services has allowed me to discover new music and artists I wouldn't have otherwise. When music was only accessible through a purchase, I was unlikely to stray away from what I usually listen to due to the financial commitment #S22POPMUS
@r0dfowler I agree that many of the top-charting hits have a more formulaic sound. Artists know what types of songs will perform well and craft them accordingly. I Still think there are a lot of interesting and experimental songs out there you just won't hear them on the radio.
@ian_pat_carroll Totally agree. Even if music has become more commercialized with a similar sound, it still serves as a powerful platform to convey an artist's message
#S22POPMUS While many popular songs share a similar sound, I disagree that pop music is dumbed down. Many artists still use music to convey complex stories or share their issues. A song can be popular and catchy while also having a deeper, more artistic meaning