When the Muslim population in a country is less than 2%, they are a peace-loving minority that poses no threat to other ethnic groups. United States 1.1%, China 1.8% for example.
When the Muslim population is 2-5%, they begin to push for government authorization to enforce Islamic law in Muslim enclaves, recruiting new members from prisons and the streets, with disturbances occurring in Muslim enclaves. Such countries include: Australia 3.2%, Canada 4.9%, Italy 4.8%.
Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4%
When the Muslim population reaches 5-10%, major disturbances erupt in Muslim enclaves; they advocate for the introduction of halal foods, ensuring that halal food practitioners are Muslims; they pressure chain supermarkets to label shelves with halal certifications, threatening those who refuse to comply. Such countries include: Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4%, Philippines 5%, Sweden 7.1%, Switzerland 5.9%, Netherlands 5.5%.
When the Muslim population approaches 10-20%, nationwide riots occur; Muslims issue a series of demands, such as building large mosques in enclaves, granting super-national and super-legal privileges, forcing non-Muslims to follow Muslim customs, and criminalizing "expressions of dissatisfaction with Islam." Such countries include: France 10.8%, India 14.6%, Israel 18.4%, Russia 13%.
When the Muslim population is 20-60%, jihadist militants sporadically massacre non-believers, burning down Christian and Jewish places of worship; other ethnic groups either convert to Islam out of fear of being killed or are killed by Muslims; the country experiences massacres and ongoing terrorist attacks. Such countries include: Ethiopia 33%, Bosnia 50.7%, Chad 55%.
When the Muslim population reaches 60-80%, Islamic law replaces secular law, establishing a theocratic regime that persecutes all other non-believers in the name of the state, massacres Christians, and imposes taxes on non-believers using Islamic law as a weapon. Such countries include: Lebanon 67.8, Albania 60%, Malaysia 63%, Qatar 77.5% (Qatari citizen 100%).
When the Muslim population is 80%-98%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: Sudan 96.6%, Bangladesh 90%, Egypt 93%, Indonesia 87%, Iraq 99.6%, Pakistan 97%, Palestine 98%, Syria 90%, Turkey 94%.
When the Muslim population is 98 to 100%, the Islamic people welcome the "House of Islamic Peace." In theory, this should be a time of peace, as everyone is Muslim, living in harmony without internal strife—but in reality, it is nothing like that; peace is not achieved, because in 100% purely Islamic countries, Muslim groups of different sects attack each other, vie to become the leaders of domestic Islamic law, and seek to eliminate other Muslim factions for all sorts of reasons. Such countries include: When the Muslim population is 80%-99%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: , Afghanistan 100%, Somalia 99.6%, Yemen 100%. Maldives 99%, Mauritania 99.6%, Morocco 99%, Niger 98.2%, Iran 99.5%
Now that Amad will potentially be back in full training and available for the first team after the international break, Michael Carrick needs to understand something.
STOP COMPLICATING THIS TEAM.
The left-wing options should be Matheus Cunha and Marcus Rashford.
Nobody else.
If Cunha isn't playing on the left wing, he should be on the bench. It's that simple.
Left wing: Cunha or Rashford.
The striker options should be Benjamin Šeško and Bryan Mbeumo.
If Šeško isn't available, Mbeumo starts up front.
Zirkzee should only play as the central forward if both Šeško and Mbeumo are unavailable.
Then there's the right wing.
Amad Diallo starts.
If Amad isn't available, Shea Lacey starts.
And please, stop playing Mbeumo on the right wing.
That's not his game.
Mbeumo isn't a traditional wide forward. He's an inside forward who naturally drifts into central areas and operates between the lines, almost like a false nine.
So why keep forcing him out wide?
The options are ridiculously simple:
LW: Rashford / Cunha
ST: Šeško / Mbeumo
RW: Amad / Lacey
That's it.
Michael Carrick needs to stop making this Manchester United team look more complicated than it actually is.
Stop complicating things for Manchester United. Stop complicating things for yourself.
The above assertions are factually incorrect and misleading. The facts are as below:
During the second wave of Covid-19, IndianOil was assigned task of Liquid Medical Oxygen (LMO) transportation in the country. This included importing Liquid Oxygen, leasing and manufacturing of ISO Containers and Road Tankers, inland transportation of Liquid Oxygen from manufacturing Plants to the hospitals as well as cylinder filling Plants.
Accordingly, ISO Containers for Liquid Medical Oxygen transportation were imported by IndianOil from various countries. At the same time, Indian manufacturers were also given contracts for manufacturing of ISO Containers in India.
MoP&NG vide OM M-12043(11)/222/2021-OMC-PNG dated 25.10.2021 had conveyed the approval of PM Cares Fund Trust for grant of Rs. 189.4 Crores for procurement of Liquid Oxygen equipment by IndianOil through PM Cares Fund.
Subsequently, total fund of Rs. 189.4 crores was received by IndianOil in a special dedicated bank account on 12.01.2022. Against the above, Rs. 86.13 crore was spent in FY 2021-22 and the balance of Rs. 103.27 crore was reflected in the books of accounts as on 31.03.2022.
Finally, a total of Rs. 91.48 crores were spent on executing the stated activities during the period 2021-2023.
Accordingly, the balance amount of Rs. 97.92 Cr. were returned back to PM Cares Fund in two tranches of Rs. 56.59 Cr. and Rs. 41.33 Cr. on 13.07.2023 and 16.07.2024 respectively.
Liquid Medical Oxygen operation was successfully co-ordinated with support of MoP&NG under guidance of DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
I compared Fanta sold in France with the one sold in India.
French Fanta contains around 4 teaspoons of sugar.
Indian Fanta contains around 10 teaspoons of sugar.
French Fanta does not contain artificial colours.
Indian Fanta contains artificial colours.
French Fanta contains real oranges.
Indian Fanta does not contain oranges and uses “orange flavours”.
French Fanta contains around 69 calories.
Indian Fanta contains around 168 calories.
Same brand. Same drink. Completely different product.
The question is simple:
Why are healthier formulations possible abroad, but not in India?
INDIANS DESERVE BETTER!
Where’s the rain Mumbai ? It came last week, like an angry vomit for 3 days and now disappeared ? In all my years in this city, I haven’t witnessed such a dry July.
Almost as if cutting 45000 mangroves, destroying Aarey, letting a 1000 trees fall in 3 days by choking roots - was a bad idea, no ?
���ुठे गेली पाउस ?
@MumbaiPolice@MTPHereToHelp there's an unconscious man lying half on the road on the Eastern Freeway southbound lane parallel to Mazgaon Dock. Please check, accident waiting to happen.
If not done, I'll be involving the authorities including a consumer complaint. I'm already regretting going against the reviews from past owners by opting for Tata over other international brands, don't turn it into harassment. (5/n)
@tata_cars I have started dreading giving my car to your workshops because they manage to consistently disappoint. I had accidental damage to the sunroof of my 2024 Safari Accomplished Plus Dark Edition. (1/n)
I don't know now what all may have been further damaged / replaced / changed without my knowledge, but I'm 100% sure I'm going to be disappointed if and when I collect the car. I would like my car to be ready and delivered within 2 days. (4/n)
I've been served a police notice to appear for "questioning" in an FIR with 13 sections slapped on me, just for quoting a viral post and commenting that private chats between consenting adults are no one's business if spouses have no issue.
FIR mentioned that 12 People accross India got such summons for comment on those alleged chats
This is how TMC MP Mahua Moitra uses state machinery to harass ordinary citizens in West Bengal who dare comment on public controversies involving her.
The FIR (Kotwali PS Case No. 142/2026) invokes everything from IT Act 66(C), 66(D), 67, 67(A) to multiple BNS sections 75, 78, 79, 316(4), 349(2), 352, 356, 61(2).
13 sections for a simple quote tweet defending privacy!
This isn’t law enforcement. This is intimidation by a powerful MP using the West Bengal Police as her personal tool.
Thankfully, the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court intervened promptly and stayed all coercive action against me. Justice prevailed over political vendetta.
When an MP can weaponise the police against a common citizen for a tweet, what hope do ordinary Bengalis have?
This is not about any individual; it’s about the right to free speech. If quoting a viral post and saying “mind your own business” invites 13 sections and a police summons, then democracy in West Bengal is in danger.
Thank you, Calcutta High Court, for protecting citizens from such misuse of power.
Last but not least, a big Thanks to @amitmalviya, for helping us by providing Legal help.
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7.
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.
So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem.
“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.”
Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.
So the first four men were unaffected.
They would still drink for free but what about the other six men?
The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage.
They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving).
The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving).
The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving).
The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving).
The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving).
And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.
But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!“
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.
But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!
And that’s how it works.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Low IQ Sanghis using hate, abusive language and vulgarities to argue that @BJP4India is not responsible for hate, abuse, vulgarity and a generalised ethical & moral decline in Indian society. And they don’t even see what they are. Idiocy unbound.