@JomboyMedia Did the umpire crew initially award the run when he crossed the plate? If not then why would you need to appeal the runner.
I would think that you should only have to appeal the runner once they determined he scored, which doesn't look like they were fairly given the chance to do
@TalkinBaseball_ Did the umpire crew initially award the run when he crossed the plate? If not then why would you need to appeal the runner.
I would think that you should only have to appeal the runner once they determined he scored, which doesn't look like they were fairly given the chance to do
@NESN Did the umpire crew initially award the run when he crossed the plate? If not then why would you need to appeal the runner.
I would think that you should only have to appeal the runner once they determined he scored, which doesn't look like they were fairly given the chance to do
@balkwhisperer Did the umpire crew initially award the run when he crossed the plate? If not then why would you need to appeal the runner.
I would think that you should only have to appeal the runner once they determined he scored, which doesn't look like they were fairly given the chance to do
@PitchingNinja Did the umpire crew initially award the run when he crossed the plate? If not then why would you need to appeal the runner.
I would think that you should only have to appeal the runner once they determined he scored, which doesn't look like they were fairly given the chance to do
@ChrisRose@TalkinBaseball_ Did the umpire crew initially award the run when he crossed the plate? If not then why would you need to appeal the runner.
I would think that you should only have to appeal the runner once they determined he scored, which doesn't look like they were fairly given the chance to do
@barstoolsports Did the umpire crew initially award the run when he crossed the plate? If not then why would you need to appeal the runner.
I would think that you should only have to appeal the runner once they determined he scored, which doesn't look like they were fairly given the chance to do
@Ozzburne@shegone03 In this scenario stealing third increases your chances of tying or winning by roughly 0%. Getting caught stealing 3rd drastically reduces your chances of tying or winning.
@ZFy5gp@shegone03 Even if him stealing third "worked" it was still a shit call. Being on third vs second in that situation is completely inconsequential
@nygiant_11@shegone03 blame the system not the player" what an absolute pussy remark. Everyone has the agency to make the right choice. He made the choice to pad stats at the detriment of his own teams success. That was his choice. I still like the kid but removing agency from his actions helps no one
@MyocarditisMan@shegone03 Not when there is absolutely zero benefit to doing so. Stealing second has a benefit of removing possibility of double play. Stealing third does literally nothing to help you win in that situation
@GarebearNola3 @march293801@shegone03 If next three guys single he scores without stealing anyway. The only benefit to stealing second is getting rid of double play possibility.