Ever felt the frustration of your hard work in OSS going unrewarded? The tea Protocol gets it. We’re here to change that. Join us in making open-source sustainable!
https://t.co/KUZ4gkRDBe
I just unlocked a @BLAST_L2 Golden Ticket which earns me Points, Gold, Uncommon Hoodies, and Cybertrucks! Download the Blast App to earn $BLAST and Golden Tickets in Phase 2!
10) And a tip for @PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs . Don't hurt the working people. Taking from the rich is not as bad as taking the last from the poor. You need to give out widely, all users are useful. You said it yourself earlier! Yes, the value of a user is different. And airdrop can be distributed based on that value. But it's silly to deny it. You have a chance to turn the game in your direction, to distribute airdrop decentralized to a large number of wallets and transparently, so that there are no questions like with zkSync and Starknet.
9) Everyone understands everything. Projects and teams are not on the side of users. They play their dirty games and cover themselves with the word decentralization to make more money. If anything I don't claim airdrop from @zkSync. But I will not be silent as a representative of the community anymore! Projects have switched from tokensales to airdrops only because it is easier to distribute tokens to their wallets.
8) Or here's a wallet that received 100,000 $ZK tokens. https://t.co/iWOOsSoBMu
As per instructions he threw in liquidity and bought 2 HOLD, LONG tokens for the multiplier. Did nothing in other networks except one tx in Optimism and in Ethereum network some tx. And that's it! What a lucky wallet..... Or knowledgeable about something? I wonder whose it is?
@zksync @TheZKNatiou
7) Another example from @0xNonceSense. Developer with 47 wallets does only what is required to get airdrop, gets 660,000 tokens on his wallets. @zksync @TheZKNatiou
https://t.co/HpuhqqF8LT
6) Another example. A user deposits funds on February 22 and immediately withdraws them. And gets airdrop for 160,000 $ZK tokens as a moderator. @zksync @TheZKNatiou
https://t.co/PAta6rpHD1
5) There was a leak within the project or ecosystem. Intentional or not we don't know. But the facts are there. Ecosystem project Woo publishes a post on March 27 that the @zkSync snapshot is probably made on March 14 and that among the requirements will be a wallet balance of 100 USDT. Isn't that a lot of coincidences? https://t.co/cQ10F9W8Z6
4) the league system for wallets is completely opaque, where wallets that did not score 450 $ZK were stripped of their allocation in the third stage after the multipliers. The team did not provide a formula or other mechanism to verify the wallet. Users are deprived of the opportunity to verify that their wallet did not score the required minimum. Why the whole selection system then? We could have chosen the winners on dice..... @zksync @TheZKNatiou
3) The difference between the minimum allocation of 917 $ZK tokens and the maximum #airdrop of 100,000 tokens is 100 times. Just think about it! Name me at least one project in recent years with such a spread. The project talked about decentralization, so why not distribute to more wallets? By setting a maximum of 30,000 tokens per wallet, you could increase decentralization by 2 times, distributing to 1,400,000 wallets instead of 700,000. @zksync @TheZKNatiou
Airdrop failure from @zkSync or where is the decentralization?
Blockchain is a transparent territory. Traces remain, even if someone leaves an airstream for maneuvering.
The @zksync team has made a sensation in the crypto community with the most opaque distribution possible. Some points are simply absurd.
@gluk64@frogmonkee@Ozhar@Yogi13031997@stonecoldpat0@TrustlessState@Caneleo55@heycape_@0x_Lens@gluk64
@TheZKNatiou
#zksyncscam
1) 13,000 wallets with 0 tx in the zkSync network received an allocation. And what use are these users to the project if they haven't even come in contact with it? https://t.co/T7Tigfx0FX
🚨Today the @zksync team announced an airdrop distribution and a story about what exactly this distribution will be for.
✅ Criteria:
📍You are an active user and hold liquidity in some projects (pools, lendigs)
📍Your wallet has been active on the ZkSync Era network for more than 3 months
☑️ There are also additional multipliers that increase the distribution:
🔵 Interaction with 10 smart contracts
🔵 5 or more transactions in Paymaster
🔵 Trade 10 or more tokens in ZkSync
🔵 Be a holder of Omnibus NFT
🔵 Donations to Gitcoin (zkSync Lite)
🔵 Transactions on the Ethereum main network
‼️ And all this seems normal, but I have one important question: why are users who fully meet this criterion ultimately not eligible to receive awards?
I'm just sure that the ZkSync team made a mistake during the distribution and many eligible users end up with an "not eligible" status.
🫂I speak for the majority of your community, your real users, and I ask you to at least give people the opportunity to appeal. You simply have to look at many wallets. They clearly deserve awards and it is not clear why their wallets are not eligible for an award when they meet absolutely all the requirements and criteria.
‼️I ask you to describe in more detail the criteria for receiving awards, so that everyone can understand why he is not worthy of receiving them. Because so far it all looks like those who have suffered are those who fully meet all the requirements.
⛔️I believe that you are not another @Starknet or @PolyhedraZK who treated their community like garbage and as a result are now receiving a response from their community. I will never use Starknet again and recommend everyone to do the same.
🤚Personally, I have always considered ZkSync one of those projects that can replicate the guys from @arbitrum , which everyone loves and always remembers with warmth. I would be very upset if Twitter was littered with hashtags #zksyncscam or #zkscam and I hope that doesn't happen. No one will judge you if you make strict criteria and someone doesn't pass them. But the community will not be able to forgive the fact that many of the people fit all the criteria that you described, but in the end they will not receive the drop. I tried to explain in as much detail as possible the problem that exists now.
We look forward to your response and hope for the best!✊
@CoinList is experimenting with tokensale formats. In the @MOCAFoundation sale, there is an option for Whales who can get a guaranteed distribution if they deposit $100,000 or more. But I have a question, in case of account banning and inability to withdraw funds just because your @CoinListSupport doesn't double check documents and doesn't respond for months, will these users also have to run after you for months to get their money back? Account ban can come trivially if you're travelling the world and log into a sale from a different IP.
It's commendable that Coinlist is experimenting with formats, changing. But it is very bad that over the years of existence nothing has been done in terms of improving user support. Your users go complain anywhere, to me in chat rooms, in comments under videos, because they know that you as a platform don't care about them. And that's sad.
@rargulati We've already talked to you about this and you agreed that the user should be able to get their money back anyway, even if it means closing their account. Solve this problem at last! Assigning a user's deposit to yourself is how legitimate it is... FTX already paid for it. I hope you are smarter than that!
Come farm the future of AI and Intents with me. Aperture Finance’s INTENTional Campaign is airdropping 7% of total $APTR supply!
Join me, farm points, earn $APTR. @ApertureFinance#AI#Intents
https://t.co/kQ67NcBBfK good