@NoelDolphin@Captain_Deltic@Adam1701D But what percentage was it on the ECML back in the 1980s there is more to electrification than the catenary, getting clearance to bridges is probably higher.
@YunaQQQ@ourworldalpha1@RossKneeDeep Facts and economic logic might confuse them , and it is clear de Gaulle was correct in developing an independent nuclear deterrent and not relying on the untrustworthy Yanks
@Horatioyuletide@ClarkeMicah@RemcoTensen Whilst is clear it ignores the perception that cycle usage increases risk taking, it doesnโt seem to assess the deterrent impact compulsion causes , so fewer cyclists leads to a less fit population and drivers less used to cyclists leading to a greater accident rate.
@MaCgroupUK@ClarkeMicah Your maths is ever so slightly simplistic and as such totally wrong, perhaps look at the places like the Netherlands and Australia for why you shouldnโt make helmets compulsory or do you want more traffic jams and obese unfit citizens?
@ClarkeMicah Peter you are talking nonsense and are either being deliberately stupid about the difference between electric assist bikes and illegal electric motor bikes or need to get some education. I have seen many older cyclist use the former to allow them to keep riding.