Olivia
Online
TheHguy
@theHguy996
Into travelling, economy, nature, aviation, adventure, south africa, cape town, music, photography, art, design, business
South africa
Joined November 2012
172 Following
79 Followers
911 Posts
@_ThePugFather N2 does not pass Worcester
@info_rudolph can one still attach a sling to the 6-9 Pivot bipod after installing on a rifle?
Your life simply reflects what you’ve prioritized.
ㅤ
What you've achieved tells you what you were willing to suffer for.
ㅤ
What you failed at tells you the opposite.
https://t.co/ivXRKXJvQg
@sciencegirl Humanity
@FitVaultSA is this really true? I need this for Multiply
THE SHOCKING FINANCIAL LESSONS OF THE ANGLO-BOER WAR (1899-1902)
By Wiets J Buys
The Anglo-Boer War became a financial quagmire that fundamentally reshaped the British state, and it permanently altered the relationship between a government and its citizens’ wallets.
This was not just a war of spiralling costs; it was a financial Trojan Horse. This “temporary crisis” was used to normalise a higher level of taxation on ordinary people, permanently expand the size of government, and set a terrifying new benchmark for the cost of modern warfare.
1. The War Was Supposed to Cost £10 Million. It Cost 20 Times More.
In October 1899, with an air of supreme confidence, the British government presented its initial budget for the Anglo-Boer War. The forecast was that a force of 50,000 men would secure victory in four months. The price tag for this swift triumph was pegged at £10 million - an amount that, at the time, “was thought to be a very liberal estimate.”
This projection wasn’t just wrong; it was a fantasy. The British had anticipated a short, conventional war. What they got was a brutal, protracted guerrilla conflict against a determined foe. The war dragged on for nearly three years, ultimately requiring a force of 250,000 men (250000 - the highest number of soldiers at any one time and 448000 soldiers in total) and costing over £200 million.
This staggering twenty-fold overrun meant that official cost estimates were “regularly insufficient, necessitating large supplementary estimates in rapid succession.” The profound miscalculation revealed the hubris of the imperial government and posed an unprecedented challenge to its financial planners, forcing them to scramble for funds in ways they had never imagined.
2. Everyday Items Were Taxed to Foot the Bill.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sir Michael Hicks-Beach, faced a dilemma: fund the spiralling war costs entirely through debt, hiding the price from the public, or make its sacrifice felt in every home. He chose the latter, launching a bold plan to ensure every citizen felt an “immediate and specific sacrifice.” He didn’t invent a complex new system; instead, he reached directly into the daily lives of the British people by raising taxes on the most common of goods.
The following existing taxes were increased to fund the war effort:
- Income Tax: Increased from 8d. to 1s. in the pound.
- Beer Tax: Increased by 1s. per barrel.
- Spirits Tax: Increased by 6d. per gallon.
- Tobacco Tax: Increased by 4d. per pound.
- Tea Duty: Increased by 2d. per pound.
Later, as costs continued to mount, the government introduced new taxes, including an import duty on sugar - reinstated “some twenty-seven years�� after being abolished - and a highly controversial export duty on coal. The coal tax was so contentious that “strikes were threatened by the coal workers.”
This strategy made the cost of a war thousands of miles away painfully tangible at the breakfast table and in the pub, demonstrating a government desperate for every available source of revenue.
But here is the most stunning revelation of all: the money from your morning tea and evening beer wasn't actually paying for the war. It was paying for something else entirely, while the war itself was being funded by massive debt.
3. A "Stealth" Spending Increase Swallowed the New Tax Revenue.
Herein lies the financial sleight-of-hand. The new taxes, which citizens were told were for the war, were almost immediately consumed by a rapid and permanent rise in ordinary government spending. The war provided the perfect political cover for a fundamental expansion of the peacetime state.
The numbers tell the story. Between the 1898-99 fiscal year and the 1902-03 fiscal year, ordinary government expenditure - excluding all war charges - grew from £108,150,000 to an estimated £133,809,000. The revenue from the “temporary” war taxes was being used to prop up a newly inflated peacetime bureaucracy. A contemporary analysis laid the situation bare:
Thus the additional taxation laid each year ostensibly for war charges is being practically required to balance the ordinary expenditure of the year following, and hence the justice of the complaint against the heavy increase of the income tax.
This was the war’s quiet, domestic legacy. The crisis created the political justification for a new, higher baseline of government spending and taxation - a fiscal reality that would have been impossible to achieve in peacetime. The measures sold as a temporary necessity for war became permanent fixtures, long after the conflict had ended.
4. On an Annual Basis, It Was the Most Costly War in British History.
While the epic 23-year war against Napoleonic France cost more in absolute terms (£831 million), the Anglo-Boer War was far more intense from a financial perspective. When measured by its yearly cost, it was the most expensive conflict Britain had ever waged.
The average annual cost of the Anglo-Boer War was £53,152,000. This figure dwarfs the yearly expenditures of Britain’s other major historical conflicts.
- Anglo Boer War: £53.1 million per year
- War with France (1793-1815): £36.1 million per year
- Crimean War (1854-56): £34.6 million per year
- War with American Colonies (1776-85): £9.7 million per year
This incredible burn rate reveals the true scale of what was initially dismissed as a minor colonial engagement. The logistical demands and capital expenditure required to fight a modern, industrial war far from home created a financial behemoth, setting a shocking new standard for the cost of conflict.
Conclusion:
The financing of the Anglo Boer War is far more than a historical curiosity. It demonstrates how a temporary crisis can be used as a financial Trojan Horse to permanently reshape a nation.
The shocking cost overruns set a new benchmark for modern warfare; the direct taxes on everyday goods normalised a new level of fiscal intrusion into citizens' lives; and most importantly, the war itself provided the perfect cover for a permanent expansion of the state.
The stated cost of a conflict, then as now, is often just the opening chapter of a much longer, more complex financial story. It forces us to ask a crucial question: which of today's "temporary" emergency measures are quietly setting the stage for a permanent new normal?
Source: Fairchild, F. R. (n.d.). The financing of the South African War. The Annals of the American Academy, (Vol. [Vol. No.], Issue [Issue No.]), 61–84.
#Boer #BoerIdentioty #Boeridentiteit #BoerWar #BoerRepublic
![WietsJBuys's tweet photo. THE SHOCKING FINANCIAL LESSONS OF THE ANGLO-BOER WAR (1899-1902)
By Wiets J Buys
The Anglo-Boer War became a financial quagmire that fundamentally reshaped the British state, and it permanently altered the relationship between a government and its citizens’ wallets.
This was not just a war of spiralling costs; it was a financial Trojan Horse. This “temporary crisis” was used to normalise a higher level of taxation on ordinary people, permanently expand the size of government, and set a terrifying new benchmark for the cost of modern warfare.
1. The War Was Supposed to Cost £10 Million. It Cost 20 Times More.
In October 1899, with an air of supreme confidence, the British government presented its initial budget for the Anglo-Boer War. The forecast was that a force of 50,000 men would secure victory in four months. The price tag for this swift triumph was pegged at £10 million - an amount that, at the time, “was thought to be a very liberal estimate.”
This projection wasn’t just wrong; it was a fantasy. The British had anticipated a short, conventional war. What they got was a brutal, protracted guerrilla conflict against a determined foe. The war dragged on for nearly three years, ultimately requiring a force of 250,000 men (250000 - the highest number of soldiers at any one time and 448000 soldiers in total) and costing over £200 million.
This staggering twenty-fold overrun meant that official cost estimates were “regularly insufficient, necessitating large supplementary estimates in rapid succession.” The profound miscalculation revealed the hubris of the imperial government and posed an unprecedented challenge to its financial planners, forcing them to scramble for funds in ways they had never imagined.
2. Everyday Items Were Taxed to Foot the Bill.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sir Michael Hicks-Beach, faced a dilemma: fund the spiralling war costs entirely through debt, hiding the price from the public, or make its sacrifice felt in every home. He chose the latter, launching a bold plan to ensure every citizen felt an “immediate and specific sacrifice.” He didn’t invent a complex new system; instead, he reached directly into the daily lives of the British people by raising taxes on the most common of goods.
The following existing taxes were increased to fund the war effort:
- Income Tax: Increased from 8d. to 1s. in the pound.
- Beer Tax: Increased by 1s. per barrel.
- Spirits Tax: Increased by 6d. per gallon.
- Tobacco Tax: Increased by 4d. per pound.
- Tea Duty: Increased by 2d. per pound.
Later, as costs continued to mount, the government introduced new taxes, including an import duty on sugar - reinstated “some twenty-seven years�� after being abolished - and a highly controversial export duty on coal. The coal tax was so contentious that “strikes were threatened by the coal workers.”
This strategy made the cost of a war thousands of miles away painfully tangible at the breakfast table and in the pub, demonstrating a government desperate for every available source of revenue.
But here is the most stunning revelation of all: the money from your morning tea and evening beer wasn't actually paying for the war. It was paying for something else entirely, while the war itself was being funded by massive debt.
3. A "Stealth" Spending Increase Swallowed the New Tax Revenue.
Herein lies the financial sleight-of-hand. The new taxes, which citizens were told were for the war, were almost immediately consumed by a rapid and permanent rise in ordinary government spending. The war provided the perfect political cover for a fundamental expansion of the peacetime state.
The numbers tell the story. Between the 1898-99 fiscal year and the 1902-03 fiscal year, ordinary government expenditure - excluding all war charges - grew from £108,150,000 to an estimated £133,809,000. The revenue from the “temporary” war taxes was being used to prop up a newly inflated peacetime bureaucracy. A contemporary analysis laid the situation bare:
Thus the additional taxation laid each year ostensibly for war charges is being practically required to balance the ordinary expenditure of the year following, and hence the justice of the complaint against the heavy increase of the income tax.
This was the war’s quiet, domestic legacy. The crisis created the political justification for a new, higher baseline of government spending and taxation - a fiscal reality that would have been impossible to achieve in peacetime. The measures sold as a temporary necessity for war became permanent fixtures, long after the conflict had ended.
4. On an Annual Basis, It Was the Most Costly War in British History.
While the epic 23-year war against Napoleonic France cost more in absolute terms (£831 million), the Anglo-Boer War was far more intense from a financial perspective. When measured by its yearly cost, it was the most expensive conflict Britain had ever waged.
The average annual cost of the Anglo-Boer War was £53,152,000. This figure dwarfs the yearly expenditures of Britain’s other major historical conflicts.
- Anglo Boer War: £53.1 million per year
- War with France (1793-1815): £36.1 million per year
- Crimean War (1854-56): £34.6 million per year
- War with American Colonies (1776-85): £9.7 million per year
This incredible burn rate reveals the true scale of what was initially dismissed as a minor colonial engagement. The logistical demands and capital expenditure required to fight a modern, industrial war far from home created a financial behemoth, setting a shocking new standard for the cost of conflict.
Conclusion:
The financing of the Anglo Boer War is far more than a historical curiosity. It demonstrates how a temporary crisis can be used as a financial Trojan Horse to permanently reshape a nation.
The shocking cost overruns set a new benchmark for modern warfare; the direct taxes on everyday goods normalised a new level of fiscal intrusion into citizens' lives; and most importantly, the war itself provided the perfect cover for a permanent expansion of the state.
The stated cost of a conflict, then as now, is often just the opening chapter of a much longer, more complex financial story. It forces us to ask a crucial question: which of today's "temporary" emergency measures are quietly setting the stage for a permanent new normal?
Source: Fairchild, F. R. (n.d.). The financing of the South African War. The Annals of the American Academy, (Vol. [Vol. No.], Issue [Issue No.]), 61–84.
#Boer #BoerIdentioty #Boeridentiteit #BoerWar #BoerRepublic](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G4ZdFS2bUAAmIZJ.jpg)
@SANParks Rare Bird Alert from @WestCoastNP The long staying EURASIAN OYSTERCATCHER was still at Seeberg Hide in the West Coast National Park this morning. Photo © Etienne Hinrichsen
This is the most detailed view of a human brain to date.
A team of researchers used electron microscopy (EM) to image a cubic millimeter-sized piece of human brain tissue at high resolution and this is a single neuron with 5,600 of the nerve fibers that connect to it.
@JohannBiermann1 Quarter pack firestarters? Wood and Charcoal too? 🤣
@theCIPC eServices saying that @HomeAffairsSA is offline now for 3 days already… is this correct and when will you be online again so we can proceed with lodging submissions?
@StandardBankZA guys Im holding on for 12 min now and counting, for online business banking … the tune is getting old now! Where’s your operators?
Only the disciplined ones in life are free.
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.4M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
110.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.4M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.2M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.8M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.7M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.5M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.5M followers