I’m not a bot. I’m not going to put my face on X. I’m not here for income. I don’t care if you follow me or not. I follow to read news, funny shit, and I hand out hearts like candy if it makes sense to me. I’ll retweet if I agree with you. Thats it!
@relaxitllbeOK@GregAbbott_TX Relax. It’s criminals doing wrong. Nothing he says or does can stop a criminally insane a$$hole.
Since it’s “preventable”, please share your solution.. with the 2A in mind. I own a gun, and that is not about to change. I am not a criminal, and that is not about to change.
In 29 days, we will celebrate the 250th birthday of our exceptional nation, which became the greatest of all because we were the first to declare the self-evident truth that all people are created equal by God.
Not “born equal.” We are “CREATED equal.”
Because God made us all in His image, it means EVERY SINGLE PERSON has inestimable DIGNITY and VALUE—and our value is not related in any way to the color of our skin, what zip code we live in, what our talents are, our health condition, or any other factor. Our value is inherent, because it is given to us by our loving Heavenly Father.
When a culture devolves to the point of depravity where “influencers” can go online and so casually dismiss the deliberate murder of their own precious child, the survival of that culture itself is at risk.
God have mercy on our nation as we pray and work for an end to this evil, for hearts and minds to change, and for a renewed understanding of the self-evident truths and the sanctity of all human life.
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you.” (Jeremiah 1:5)
Husband took the day off for a wedding yesterday. One of his drivers ran over a mill operator in his belly dump. Meeting was called today. The driver who had the accident was in the meeting. The “leader” told the whole room that the driver who”did everything right”.
This is where it’s headed. Fatalities. Lawsuits don’t fix the death. Lawsuit will not help the driver with 2 broken femurs. No accountability on the driver, and the company is complacent. This is an opportunity. Run! Don’t look back.
The driver proceeded to mock, and degrade the man he ran over. “Untrained fucking idiot”, “fucking moron” so on and so forth. Then husband gets called into main office and demoted. Pay stripped.
No. I’m going to end this right here.
I totally reject the claim that James Talarico is teaching Christianity.
This is long but I’ll throughly SMASH what he claims… Period.
This is not about whether he speaks well, has compassion, or is a great politician.
This is about whether he faithfully teaches the Word of God.
James Talarico publicly declared that God is “nonbinary.”
Yet throughout Scripture, God reveals Himself as Father, King, Lord, and He. God is Spirit, but the consistent revelation of Scripture is unmistakable. Pointing to poetic maternal imagery and then claiming God is nonbinary is not exegesis. It is importing a modern political ideology into an ancient text.
James Talarico says the Bible is silent on abortion.
Silent?
Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee.
You knitted me together in my mother’s womb.
John the Baptist leaped in the womb at the presence of Christ.
The Bible repeatedly speaks of life in the womb as human life known by God.
Then Talarico points to Mary’s consent at the Annunciation and attempts to transform the miraculous conception of the Messiah into an argument for modern bodily autonomy.
That is not what Luke 1 is about.
That is not biblical interpretation.
That is reading a modern political framework back into Scripture.
James Talarico repeatedly says Jesus never asked people to worship Him.
Yet the Gospels are filled with people worshiping Jesus.
Thomas fell before Him and declared, “My Lord and my God.”
The disciples worshiped Him.
The blind man worshiped Him.
Jesus accepted worship because Jesus is God.
To reduce Christ to a moral teacher who merely tells us to be nice to people is to amputate the very heart of Christianity.
Then there is the Gospel of Thomas.
Talarico has quoted a rejected second-century Gnostic text to support modern gender ideology, implying that the early Church somehow got it wrong.
The Gospel of Thomas was rejected because it was not apostolic, not orthodox, and not consistent with the faith once delivered to the saints.
When your argument requires leaving the Bible and reaching into rejected Gnostic writings to support modern theories, you are not defending Christianity.
You are revising it.
What I find most revealing is that Talarico continually emphasizes that Jesus talked about economic justice, helping the poor, welcoming strangers, and caring for the marginalized.
Of course He did.
Every Bible-believing Christian should do those things.
But Jesus also talked about sin.
Jesus talked about repentance.
Jesus talked about judgment.
Jesus talked about obedience.
Jesus talked about sexual morality.
Jesus talked about marriage.
Jesus affirmed Genesis.
Jesus affirmed the Law.
Jesus said the road to destruction is broad and the gate to life is narrow.
You cannot endlessly preach compassion while muting repentance.
You cannot endlessly preach acceptance while muting holiness.
You cannot endlessly preach inclusion while muting obedience.
That is not the whole Christ.
That is a carefully edited Christ.
My problem with James Talarico is not that he is compassionate.
My problem is that he repeatedly appears to start with modern progressive conclusions and then searches Scripture for supporting language.
Christianity does not bend the Word of God to fit culture.
Culture bends to the Word of God.
If something was sin when Moses wrote.
If it was sin when the prophets wrote.
If it was sin when Jesus taught.
If it was sin when Paul wrote.
Then a politician, a seminarian, a legislature, a court, or a cultural movement in 2026 does not possess the authority to sanctify it.
Truth does not evolve because society becomes uncomfortable with it.
Do we submit ourselves to Scripture?
Or do we demand that Scripture submit itself to us?
That is the divide.
And that is why we faithful Christians reject James Talarico’s, regardless of how eloquently he presents it.
#SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
"And God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life” (Genesis 2:7)
(Which technically would have contained CO₂ (as all mammalian breath does), and
That CO₂ molecule would technically qualify as a greenhouse gas
So why don't you take it up with the Big Man upstairs JT....