UBI treats poor people the same way we treat rich people. It makes no difference between them. That’s the beauty of it. Freedomdividend = liberty 🇺🇸🇩🇪🇫🇷🐇
Major study finds voters have statistically zero influence on Congress.
In case you’re curious why the 80% issues don’t pass, from crime to open borders to secure elections.
“Blue-collar jobs are safe from AI.”
Not for long.
This welding robot climbs vertical steel walls like Spider-Man.
While everyone is watching AI replace coders and office work…
industrial robots are quietly entering the physical world too.
Welding.
Grinding.
Inspection.
Rust removal.
The scary part?
Software automation was the easy phase.
Now machines are learning to work in the real world.
Why are so many CIA-inflected NGOs & CIA exiles pushing "Kids Safety" laws in the US & globally? Because these laws shift the power over algorithm design from tech platforms to those same CIA-inflected NGOs, allowing them to influence what goes viral ahead of elections worldwide
Watch a team of humanoid robots running a full 8-hr shift at human performance levels. This is fully autonomous running Helix-02 https://t.co/bIgpYuaYCj
Notice how 2nd paragraph it says “disinformation undermines the public’s right to know” framing their censorship atrocities as simply protecting fragile minds from accidentally knowing things they shouldn’t know
🚨 WhatsApp’s “end-to-end encrypted” privacy is a total lie.
New class-action lawsuit just dropped: Meta secretly let employees, contractors like Accenture, and third parties read, intercept, and store your private messages WITHOUT consent.
All while marketing it as “only you and the recipient can read it.”
Zuck lied to billions. Your chats were never safe.
The EU deep state is telling us (via state-owned media and Soros-funded NGOs) that Telegram is a PROBLEM because people can discuss content from OTHER social media in PRIVATE telegram groups. This nonsense is used to justify surveillance (Chat Control) and censorship (DSA).
So, as expected, the European Commission has finally activated the Digital Services Act’s (DSA) “rapid response system” in the context of the upcoming Hungarian elections, which gives EU-funded “fact-checkers” and “NGOs” a veto over online speech in Hungary.
This is a serious escalation in the EU’s interference in the Hungarian elections. The official explanation is that this is needed to combat “Russian interference”. But as I noted in a recent article for @compactmag, no evidence whatsoever has been produced to support this claim.
The narrative almost exclusively relies on an “investigation” by journalists at the Warsaw-based nonprofit VSquare, which claims that Putin has instructed a group of political strategists and Russian military intelligence to interfere in the parliamentary elections in Hungary in April in order to ensure that Orbán wins.
And what is the evidentiary basis for this extraordinary claim? It boils down to this (literally): “Multiple European national security sources have told me.” In other words, no evidence whatsoever is provided. We are simply asked to trust the “investigative journalists” in question. One might be inclined to extend that trust if the outlet in question were genuinely independent. Regrettably, it is not.
A glance at VSquare’s donor list reveals it to be less an independent journalistic outfit than a textbook example of artificial civil society, funded by entities like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), USAID, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and various EU-funded consortia. In other words, VSquare is part and parcel of the “color revolution” infrastructure that, for decades, has sought to bring Central and Eastern Europe in line with the agenda of Brussels and Washington.
It’s clear what is happening: they’re applying the Russiagate script that was previously used to subvert the elections in Romania just over a year ago. The aim is twofold. Ideally, tilt the elections in favour of the pro-EU, pro-war opposition candidate Péter Magyar by using the DSA to influence the pre-election online narrative. It’s well-known that the the EU’s “rapid response system” enables approved third parties — the aforementioned EU-funded “fact-checkers” and “NGOs” — to submit priority content moderation requests that disproportionately affect “populist” or EU/NATO-critical actors.
If this doesn’t work — and it’s unlikely to work in the Hungarian context — then the allegations of Russian interference serve the purpose of laying the groundwork to delegitimise the result if Orbán wins, by seeding seeding a story of “stolen” or “unfair” elections. This is incredibly dangerous, and is yet another confirmation that the very institutions invoking the threat of foreign interference to justify their intervention are themselves the most consequential foreign actors in Hungary’s election.
Read the full article here: https://t.co/AP5q2FEuk9