@esaumccaulley@SpursOfficial Oh man. Unrecognizably big. Daniel Levy set up the club to make this kind of spending possible, but we had to get rid of Daniel Levy to ever have a chance of spending this big. He never would have. Transformative window.
@WankerEvan@stephenjhall@LinkofSunshine This is pretty false actually. While there can be some genetic predisposition to TD2, there's absolutely evidence that it can and has been reversed (if you want to call it remission, fine) for many people by lifestyle and diet changes.
@skijack90@JoinCrowdHealth It's 99.9% funding rate for ELIGIBLE bills... Not "any random bill that gets submitted." The .1% are bills that were eligible but did not get funded (like in their original post). Everything gets more expensive in inflationary environment but name something better than this.
@skijack90@JoinCrowdHealth It's not about declines. It's about fair prices. The reason they've declined so few is because they negotiate bills into a fair price range. They don't just automatically stamp "approved" for every bill that comes through. They work to get the bills into a fair range first.
@skijack90@JoinCrowdHealth It's already cheaper than insurance, and they have seldom ever asked for the maximum commitment amount. Not sure what more you could ask for.
@skijack90@JoinCrowdHealth This isn't "insurance" and it's fine that that is what you want it for, but in order to have enough people willing to help YOU when YOU need something funded, the criteria has to fit enough people to make it sustainable.
@skijack90@JoinCrowdHealth Do you know how many members are young families? If you don't fund pregnancies, then this isn't viable for a huge portion of the member base. The pregnancy member commitment is already $3k instead of $500. I'm not sure how this would be sustainable with that criteria.