@LorenCulp The fact that the founding fathers felt that the government searching through citizens personal belongings was so abhorrent that they bothered to write an amendment over it, while the cops act like there's something wrong with you if you have a problem with it is crazy.
@Daehenob67@ScottEnlow Find the Boston TV station's exposé on the state's police academy system. 40-something ex-cops who've been fired,forced to retire and/or lost their LE credentials TEACHING AT THE ACADEMY.
Some w/ serious felonies.
Worst of the worst teaching the new cadets.
@GeniusCPA1@ScottEnlow To detain someone, or demand their ID is an infringement into someone's basic freedoms.
To do so they need a legitimate reason, and the courts have outlined exactly what circumstances the cops can infringe on those freedoms.
It's the cops job to know those circumstances.
@BiggClayMusic@chika_vijay Reminds me of the story of "Col" Tom Potter Saying "I gotta find me a white boy who sings like a black man".
Elvis wrote none of his own music.
They were looking for someone with charisma that was pretty to put a face on rock n roll.
They molded him into the part.
@SunsetDreamsWV@omoelerinjare1 Blocking his movement, giving commands and surrounding him is considered a "detainment" as established by the federal district court that oversees California, and illegal without reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime.
@omoelerinjare1 In California, the federal district court has ruled specifically, that police blocking a citizen's movement and surrounding them, is a del facto detainment, and illegal without reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime, and a civil rights violation.
@TWOCOPS1DONUT Police departments spend millions of our dollars training cop how to beat up, tear gas us, run us off the road, but can't take the time to teach them basic civil rights?
@Yachtspecialist@twitch_tv_pat@ScottEnlow Press credentials are used to get access to areas the general public cannot normally go, locker room after a game etc.
Anyone can gather content for possible dissemination to larger audience (definition of journalism) in public under the 1st amendment.
@JuJuForAmerica@ScottEnlow Because every court in the land has agreed that ID is covered under "persons and papers" in the 4th amendment and can only be infringed on when there's reasonable articulable suspicion of an actual crime.
He's broken no law and does not need to comply with illegal demands.
@FactorintheBS@ScottEnlow Do you understand every police department in the US has been sent multiple memos by DHS telling them that everything you've said is wrong and unconstitutional?
@cmplxmnml@ScottEnlow There's only a handful of places covered by what this dumbass is saying, and a run of the mill military installation isn't one.
There are specific red signs displayed at weapons development areas ect covered by presidential order.
The commentor you're replying to is a 🤡.
@A1RLTY@11wildcats11@ScottEnlow There's only a handful of these areas, and a run of the mill military installation isn't one.
It's secret weapons R&D.
There would be a very specific red sign prominently posted.
You're lying.
@A1RLTY@ScottEnlow You're lying. US v McDonald 1948 established that nothing veiwable from public is private.
There are only a handful of places in the US that you cannot photograph from public, but that's not a law, it's because of a Presidential Order.
@papertrail253@LorenCulp Go find the Boston TV station's exposé of the state's police academy system. 40-something ex-cops who'd been fired,forced to retire, and/or lost their LE credentials TEACHING AT THE ACADEMY.
We're paying the worst of the worst to train new cadets.