Tingvard

"Tingvard" = "Ting" (Norse assembly) + "Vard" (guardian).
Rooted in Old Norse, showing our aim to guard the governing principles of Cardano.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@InASingleWord

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@hoskytoken @NaVi_GaT0R Silly doggo.
The CC election registration period is still ongoing.
Here's where you can register @NaVi_GaT0R
https://t.co/Ib2FMlUKkH

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@Jennycitalinda @adamKDean

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@adamKDean @Jennycitalinda @phil_uplc Might as well throw this in here to keep it to the thread.
https://t.co/Br4MNmPJ7v

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@adamKDean We will bulk submit votes for most of the active actions next week.
The reason is simple, high volume.
For the same reason we are simplifying our approach when writing our rationales, sticking to a template rather than digging deep like we usually do.
https://t.co/sCQgqxPwnH

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@adamKDean We will bulk submit votes for most of the active actions next week.
The reason is simple, high volume.
For the same reason we are simplifying our approach when writing our rationales, sticking to a template rather than digging deep like we usually do.
https://t.co/sCQgqxPwnH

[Tingvard @tingvard]

We are in a high-activity period for governance actions.

This isn’t something we do lightly, but CC is unpaid and time is limited. For now we’re simplifying how we assess positions to keep pace.

We’ll use the same approach during future spikes.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@Jennycitalinda @adamKDean There's been plenty of times one or more of our members have voted abstain due to conflict of interest.
So far that has not resulted in the consortium voting abstain because of it however.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

CC should not become an isolated circle of familiar faces.

We need DReps, lawyers, SPOs, nerds, critics, and people willing to challenge consensus when it matters.

If you care about the Constitution and Cardano governance, consider running for CC.

https://t.co/Ib2FMlUKkH

[Tingvard @tingvard]

The Constitution never told us who goes first
https://t.co/DxTcmhfMBh

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@QuasarSure @IntersectMBO @IntersectCBC @EasternCardano @_KtorZ_ @AceAlliance_CC @CardanoHub_JP @phil_uplc You are stretching constitutional interpretation beyond recognition.

A private platform charging for its own off-chain process is not the Cardano protocol restricting governance rights.

CC judges governance actions, not every workflow people dislike.

Case dismissed.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

We are in a high-activity period for governance actions.

This isn’t something we do lightly, but CC is unpaid and time is limited. For now we’re simplifying how we assess positions to keep pace.

We’ll use the same approach during future spikes.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@NicolasC3rny @nimuepool Referring to what we asked @nimuepool earlier today.
https://t.co/tGWFntPsL8

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@nimuepool According to your interpretation, is it just the amount that gets approved, or the entirity of the metadata?

If the latter, then yes it is.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@NicolasC3rny @nimuepool This lack of explanation is what lead us to use Tenent 8. Because we have no grounds to assess wether or not the changes are "reasonable".

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@nimuepool I already answered this

https://t.co/tGWFntPsL8

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@nimuepool According to your interpretation, is it just the amount that gets approved, or the entirity of the metadata?

If the latter, then yes it is.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

Why we voted unconstitutional
https://t.co/plCQaXw5pf

[Cardano Gov Actions @GovActions]

CC Vote Update

Decision: Unconstitutional
Voted by: @tingvard
Rationale: https://t.co/gEr5ktrEym

@IntersectMBO
#Cardano #Governance

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@nimuepool As we said in our rationale, there is not a lack of cost breakdown. The proposal is very well written. But sadly according to our interpretation it lacks the explaner as to why it deviates from one part of what was previously approved (The 2025-2029 plan).

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@nimuepool According to your interpretation, is it just the amount that gets approved, or the entirity of the metadata?

If the latter, then yes it is.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@nimuepool With no explanation, we had no grounds to assess wether or not it was reasonable. Hence the unconstitutional based on Tenent 8.

Again, this is not an opinion, its interpretation.
Wether we agreed with the TWGA or not made no impact on the internal votes.

[Tingvard @tingvard]

@nimuepool I agree, "unreasonable" is vague.
Hence why we were hesitent to use Tenent 8 before we had properly discussed it.
Reason why we used it is that the 2025-2029 plan was part of the approved TWGA last year. This year there was a 108% deviation from it with no explanation.