Are actual GOP senators (that aren't bought and paid for) really going to let John Thune TANK election security?
I wanna know why the following Senators aren't jumping at the chance to REMOVE him and SAVE America:
Tom Cotton (R-AR): @SenTomCotton
Ted Cruz (R-TX): @SenTedCruz
Jim Banks (R-IN): @SenatorBanks
Tommy Tuberville (R-AL): @SenTuberville
Marsha Blackburn (R-TN): @MarshaBlackburn
Katie Britt (R-AL): @SenKatieBritt
John Kennedy (R-LA): @SenJohnKennedy
Rick Scott (R-FL): @SenRickScott
Mike Lee (R-UT) @BasedMikeLee
THE FORMULAS
WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER
I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data:
Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number)
Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number)
Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number)
Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number)
The Starting Points
The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs.
The Slopes - How the Formula Runs
The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop.
So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s:
Drop 1: 27.87 + (3.19 × 1) = 31.06%
Drop 2: 27.87 + (3.19 × 2) = 34.25%
Drop 3: 27.87 + (3.19 × 3) = 37.44%
Drop 4: 27.87 + (3.19 × 4) = 40.63%
Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 + (3.19 × 5) = 43.82%
Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design.
The slopes also sum to exactly zero.
+3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00
Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them.
The R Values - The results were remarkable
To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows:
Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966
Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934
Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984
Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794
R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1.
0 means completely random.
No pattern whatsoever.
1 means a perfect straight line.
Every point exactly where predicted.
For context:
0.70 is considered strong in social science research.
0.85 gets researchers excited.
0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data.
Squaring them to get R² values:
Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932
Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869
Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592
Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968
That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five.
You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks.
The Slope Relationship
The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant.
It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise.
Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do.
Why The Shutoff Had To Exist
Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces:
Raman: 27.87 + (3.19 × 7) = 50.2%
Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9%
Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2%
So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop.
The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt.
After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four.
The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.
When Karen Bass and Spencer Pratt are 1 and 2…
“We could be counting votes for weeks to decide the outcome.”
When Karen Bass and Nithya Raman are 1 and 2…
“The final election results are in!”
It happened immediately.
What a scam.
HOLY SH*T 🚨 Leaked Audio of DA Alvin Bragg’s office revealing Bragg STACKED charges against Donald Trump
Their only goal was to interfere with the Election
THIS IS UNREAL
@LeaderJohnThune To those that call South Dakota home,
@EarlyVoteAction is hiring field staff that will ensure Senate Majority Leader Thune has a Texas-sized primary in 2028
if the SAVE America Act does NOT go into effect by this November 2026.
🚨 NOW: An Assistant US Attorney is now INSIDE the Los Angeles ballot processing center, as @USAttyEssayli announces MULTIPLE federal investigations into voter fraud in California
Expose it ALL and prosecute!
The Republicans can’t find 51 votes to secure American elections while the Democrats can find millions of votes to steal American elections.
Sickening.
On behalf of the largest police news outlet in the world, we FIRMLY stand behind LA mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt's plan to FIRE the police chief if the criminals and drug addicts aren't locked up:
"If my LAPD chief that I put in doesn't do that, we'll get a new LAPD chief. And if anybody at LAPD doesn't want to enforce law, we'll get new officers!"
"I'm just going to be the mayor that comes in and says, 'Hey, everybody, the laws back, the laws that all exist! These incredible laws that are incredible DEMOCRATS voted for!' I'm going to enforce them for everybody as mayor."
"We are going to make sure that moms feel safe in Los Angeles. That is my number one priority of eight years of being mayor is to make LA the safest city in the country."
"Nobody's safe really in LA unless you're the drug dealer the drug dealers and the people giving them the needles the city our taxpayer money those the needle givers. They're safe. The meth pipe givers. They're safe."
"Everyone else is not safe in Los Angeles. So moms are getting me elected because I'm saying, as mayor, I'm going to enforce the law and make sure moms and kids can use their parks again."
"They can go to school without encampments with drug dealing and naked drug addicts having s*x in front of these schools on the sidewalk."
"I'm stopping this because it's illegal."
#thinblueline #Lawenforcement
@SatAmericaFNC@kayleighmcenany@spencerpratt
Karen Bass fired these men with one email and never responded to all their requests to meet. She didn’t even want to speak to them after firing them to fund her homeless housing program.
She defunded a 130 year old Los Angeles institution that paves the roads. This is why everybody in LA gets flat tires every 3 months. She took the money from infrastructure and used it to fund her $400M inside safe program which is essential a property development initiative masquarading as a homeless initiative.
Karen Bass is the worst mayor LA has EVER had. Vote for @SpencerPratt before June 2nd.
TRASH BANDITS: Last night rioters opened trash bags and dumped garbage all over the premises of Delaney Hall.
Here’s what it looked like as they did it. Wallowing in their own filth. So much for the environment.