@SebMinga There is quite a bit that needs reformation in the EU, especially regarding Chat Control, but I do still believe that the EU can function only as long as it has some sort of reformation. Otherwise it can quickly become what it was made to stop.
@NXT4EU I think we need to keep the EU, but keep it more difficult for the EU to add new rules, have more surveillance over what is being done and by who in the EU (stops secret meetings, etc), and make the democracy more direct. The EU should a bit more a tool for the people I believe.
@cyberforget@DigitalEU This happens since they are classified as different issues. The EU doing mass surveillance is an issue in its infancy stage, and some-fucking-how they have not yet come to the conclusion (like with all other surveillance-issue-cases) that it violates the human right to privacy.
@j23m23@_georgebaran@EU_Justice EU reformation has happened multiple times since the 1990s, and it often happens when something like what happened with Chat Control happened. What is needed is a treaty-request. That is all, - and then EU countries must decide on what is in that treaty and whether it should pass
@SaturnNova_ Agreed. I think direct democracy is difficult, and I believe it should be implemented carefully - but I still believe at least the EU itself needs to reform towards the goal of making sure its citizens have a higher level of control over the process to ensure democracy is upheld.
@j23m23@_georgebaran@EU_Justice By reformed I mean a full reform, not one regulation. What I want: I believe the EU should have an even harder time setting in motion new laws, I want there to be surveillance of all EU activity so that the people can see what is done and why. I want more direct democracy.
@SneedingChuck69@Graesplaene_ Or at least they are doing quite a bit of the lobbying to make sure they succeed. The evidence for this lies in how they literally documented this themselves and released public documents stating this.
@italicum_acetum@_georgebaran@EU_Justice Yes, there is a bunch of lobbying in brussels, something a reform would address. For the second point: dealing with one central government that 20+ governments all have a stake in takes more resources than slowly turning off the lights on each government one by one.
@swirly_fries Different people have different ideas of what expression is. Please do a better job of understanding this in the future. There are so many great emotional scenes in anime, so much so, that my extensive experience with live action-series has not left me crying like anime has.
@Hannibal9972485 Is is possible for you to write a more investigative journal WITH sources to add to a website which you can launch? This way anyone can send professional proof to your MEPs and representatives in different countries. I think that is more powerful than Twitter-journaling.
@_georgebaran@EU_Justice I would rather have a reform than a dissolvement. The EU acts as a wall to outside involvement in European matters. Currently the wall is slightly breached, which is bad, but if we get rid of the wall, anyone can come in and do as they want. I believe better to fix the wall.
Je lance l’initiative Exit Chat Control.
https://t.co/GCt0vLw7YF
Ce site est un guide complet qui vise à répertorier tous les outils nécessaires pour contourner tout système de surveillance de vos messageries privées.
Le site est open source et sera amélioré en continu.
@MangaOnichan Isn't this post a joke that comments on how wishing for people to flirt with you and believing it is others' faults is often wrong and that it is probably your own? That would make OP mature.
@MarcelKolaja@EPPGroup Agreed. There needs to be a sort of non-partison Europe-wide anti-corruption pro-democracy coalition or some bullshit to stop this. I need somewhere to stop these anti-democratic measures, and Twitter is not really it.
@_theapologist@Th3_h3ll_h0unD@DetestingArtful@ClayGregg4@beyoncegarden It used to be common sense that the world was flat and that the sun revolved around it. I prefer extreme logic leading to actual truths rather than something so simple it can never be true. I agree that hormonal balances does not decide gender, but that wasn't what he said either