@Anonimmim21 لما هاجموكم الصينيين اصبحتوا لطيفين مع العرب!!
كرهكم للعرب تاريخي ومعاصر لا يخفى علينا وقاحتكم وعنصريتكم رأيناها بأعيننا وسمعناها بأذننا
ليس فقط العرب حتى الصينييون اصبحوا يرون تملقكم للاجانب وذلكم لهم شيء مخزي ومعيب
انا لااحترمكم لانكم لاتحترموا انفسكم ولا تاريخكم ولا دينكم
@Anonimmim21 لما هاجموكم الصينيين اصبحتوا لطيفين مع العرب!!
كرهكم للعرب تاريخي ومعاصر لا يخفى علينا وقاحتكم وعنصريتكم رأيناها بأعيننا وسمعناها بأذننا
ليس فقط العرب حتى الصينييون اصبحوا يرون تملقكم للاجانب وذلكم لهم شيء مخزي ومعيب
انا لااحترمكم لانكم لاتحترموا انفسكم ولا تاريخكم ولا دينكم
A downed Ukrainian attack UAV carrying two FPV drones fitted with civilian Starlink terminals.
While SpaceX signed a defensive-only contract with Kiev, Ukrainian technicians tweaked the terminals to be used in attacks, putting SpaceX and Elon in danger of retaliation.
Çinliler ya domuzdan cok korktugumuzu düşünüyolar ya da bizim için kutsal sanıyolar. Domuz fotoğrafı atınca ne oldugunu sanıyolar acaba dllvldşxkglslsş
I feel that, at this point, this is no longer a debate about facts.
I have already distinguished her good intentions from the attacks launched by those Turkish accounts, and I have explicitly acknowledged that she should not be held responsible for the actions of others.
Yet, she keeps steering the focus back to points like "I’ve been hurt by Chinese netizens," "these accounts might be bots," and "why can’t both sides just stop?" This reveals that what she truly seeks is not an understanding of why Chinese people are provoked by such content, but rather to get people to admit that her moral judgment on this conflict is the correct one.
And I do not accept that.
She is free to believe that some of the counter-responses have gone too far.
I, for my part, maintain that issues like Unit 731, the earthquake, the stigmatization during the pandemic, and the calls for territorial fragmentation are not merely internet memes.
These two perspectives do not need to be forcibly reconciled.
Her final decision to block me actually brings a clean end to the matter: there is no longer any need for further explanation or proof, nor do I have to continue managing her expectation—the idea that "because I love China, Chinese netizens should respond in a way that makes *me* feel comfortable."
Some disagreements cannot be resolved simply by writing another three thousand words.
What she seeks is validation; what I offer is an explanation.
From the very beginning, these two things have never been the same.
I think this goes beyond her simply "suspecting the presence of Chinese 'troll farms'"; rather, she has begun to use the idea that "these people might not be real" as a defense mechanism to protect her existing worldview.
Because if she were to accept the reality—that these intense reactions are the genuine sentiments of ordinary Chinese people—she would simultaneously have to confront a far more uncomfortable truth: the China she knows, likes, and has lived in for so long is not the same as a China that is perpetually gentle, always welcoming, and one that would never push back against her home country in defense of its own history and national interests.
Consequently, the easiest psychological escape route is to claim:
"These people might be bots."
"This could be coordinated harassment."
"The 'real' Chinese people aren't like this."
Yet, this is a classic trope within Western narratives:
When Chinese people are viewed favorably, they are seen as charming, ordinary individuals.
But the moment they express political will that falls outside the Western "comfort zone," they are suddenly recast as robots, paid trolls, or manipulated accounts.
At this point, her underlying perspective is laid bare.
What she truly appreciates is a China that provides her with friendship, life experiences, a sense of cultural belonging, and a feeling of security.
But when Chinese people begin to act based on their own national memory, territorial integrity, and national interests—rather than prioritizing her personal feelings—she suddenly begins to question whether these people are even "real."
This, in itself, speaks volumes:
She is capable of accepting China as a space in which to live.
But she cannot accept China as a political community that possesses its own will, its own "red lines," and its own distinct ways of expressing anger.
And yet, both of these aspects are, in fact, one and the same China.
Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech
The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world
They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys
In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom
Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed