Tom G Thacker II 🇺🇲

Constitutional Conservative ⚖️ Patriotic Nationalist 🇺🇸 Fiscally Conservative Investment Advisor 📈 Pure Blood #NRAlifemember 💪🏻 MAGA!!!

[🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 @Real_RobN]

🚨🚨King Solomon Reporting:

“President Trump is about to begin declassifying documents at lightning speed in an operation he is calling “Hypersonic Clarity."

The Grand Conspiracy Case:

The President of the United States @realDonaldTrump vs. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON, JOHN BRENNAN, SUSAN LICE, JAMES CLAPPER, JAMES COMEY,

Adam Schiff, Andrew McCabe, Peter did Lisa, Lisa did Peter, Rod Rosenstein, Sally Yates, Bruce Whore, Nellie Whore, Loretta Lynch, Valerie Jarrett, Ben Rhodes, John Carlin, Mary McCord, James Baker, Jonathan Moffa, Michael Kortan, David Laufman, Nellie Ohr, Samantha Power, John Kerry, Lisa Monaco, Denis McDonough, Jim Rybicki, Bill Priestap, Christopher Steele, Richard Dearlove, Alexander Downer, Stefan Halper, Josef Mifsud, Sergei Millian, Sidney Blumenthal, Cody Shearer, Terry McAuliffe, Jonathan Winer, John Podesta, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, Jake Sullivan, Robbie Mook, Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann, Peter Kadzik, Rachel Brand, Matthew Axelrod, Mary Jacoby, Preet Bharara, Josh Campbell, Jennifer Palmieri, Sir Andrew Wood, Robert Hannigan, Alexandra Chalupa, Michael Sussman, Dimitry Alperovich, CrowdStrike, Fusion GPS (including, but not limited to Glenn Simpson),

and Perkins Coie (including, but not limited to, Marc Elias) falsified intelligence as part of a seditious conspiracy—the single greatest disinformation, misinformation campaign in U.S. history—with the intent of overthrowing the United States government in 2016 and the sitting President in 2017.

Guess who sits on the Board? @DevinNunes

[Mike Lindell Offense Fund @MLindellOffense]

Take a screenshot of this so we can preserve.

[Tom G Thacker II 🇺🇲 @tomgt2]

https://t.co/wTJtXfQw2p

[Speaking of Women's Health @SPKwomenshealth]

Big news in women's health! The FDA liberates women’s hormone replacement therapy -requesting that drug manufacturers remove black box warnings from HRT products.

Read the full article: https://t.co/tRFCBibr4h

#womenshealth #menopause #menopausematters #hormones

[Tom G Thacker II 🇺🇲 @tomgt2]

https://t.co/bqopn1w1sp

[Tom G Thacker II 🇺🇲 @tomgt2]

@MarieDeeOnly 🇺🇸

[Tom G Thacker II 🇺🇲 @tomgt2]

https://t.co/bqopn1w1sp

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Yesterday, Donald J. Trump nearly lost his life. An armed gunman waited for him in the bushes. He brought a go-pro camera to record it. A secret service agent spotted the barrel of a gun through a fence and shot at the gunman. The gunman fled. He was caught. And now we slowly learn about him and his motive.

President Trump is my running mate, and my friend, but he is more importantly a father and grandfather to people who love him very much. I want him to have many more years with his family. (And selfishly, I'd like many more with my own.)

I admire the president for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out of control. It nearly got Steve Scalise and many others killed a few years ago. It nearly got Donald Trump killed twice. But I want to say something about yesterday's news, and how it illuminates the difference between vigorous debate and violent rhetoric.

Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that "Democracy is on the line" in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's "fight for Democracy" and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. HIs name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones.

How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It's a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris's campaign surrogates have said things like "Trump has to be eliminated." And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months?

NBC News called the attempted assassination a "golf club incident." The LA Times told us "Trump Targeted at Golf Club." The USA Today's top of the fold headline is "Hope in America," and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump "brings these assassination attempts on himself." CNN's Dana Bash--who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat--said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn't motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly.

PBS's weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris's media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not--as the media suggested--a deranged Trump fan.

The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot.

This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent.

Consider Springfield. Citizens are telling us that there are problems. These include the undeniable truths of higher car accidents, unaffordable housing, evictions of residents, overcrowded hospitals, overstressed schools, and rising rates of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories--which, again, multiple people have spoken about (either on video or to me or my staff).

Kamala Harris's first strategy was to ignore these people and their concerns. Yes, she had prevented the deportation of millions of illegal aliens, and some of them made their way to Springfield. But it was a small town with no voice. Some of the local leadership even loved the cheap labor. So the suffering of thousands of American citizens went ignored.

Their next move with these stories is censorship. In Springfield, a psychopath (or a foreign government) calls in a bomb threat, so they blame that on President Trump (and me). The threat of violence is disgraceful of course, yet the media seems to relish it. They cover a bomb threat, but not the rise in murders. They cover the threat, but not the HIV uptick. They cover the threat, not the schools overwhelmed with new kids who don't speak English. They cover the threat, not rising insurance rates or the car accidents that caused them. They cover the threat, not the failures of Kamala Harris's leadership.

The purpose is not to turn down the rhetoric. If anything, covering the bomb threats gives whoever makes them exactly what he wants: attention. The purpose is distraction and shame. How dare you talk about the problems of Haitian migration in Springfield? You're endangering people, simply by discussing the problems of Kamala Harris's policies. It's a form of moral blackmail, designed not to make anyone safe but to shut everyone up.

Springfield is the most recent, but hardly the most egregious example. There was the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored by BigTech. And who can forget that anyone who didn't support Kamala Harris's Ukraine policy was drenched in the blood of Ukrainian children. That last one appears to have had some effect on Routh--the most recent would-be assassin. The message is always the same: don't you dare express an opinion on the public affairs of your nation. The message is: shut up.

This is the difference between debate--even aggressive debate--and censorship. It is one thing to attack Kamala Harris for "destroying the country" and quite another to say that President Trump should be "eliminated." It is one thing to criticize overheated rhetoric, and another to say that a former president has invited an assassination on himself. It is one thing to say that Donald J. Trump's arguments about the election of 2020 are wrong; it is another thing to attempt to remove him from the ballot over it.

It is one thing to say that pets are not, in fact being eaten, and another thing to say that anyone who disagrees is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous dissent, is a great tradition of the United States. Censorship is not.

For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind. I believe you have every right to criticize me and Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue things about us. But when I ask you to "tone down the rhetoric" it's not about being nice--our citizens have every right to be mean, even if I don't like it--or empty platitudes.

Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail.

I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf.

The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain.

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

Please explain your reasoning if you think non-citizens should be allowed to vote.

Please like and repost if you agree that they shouldn’t.

#PassTheSAVEAct

[DC_Draino @DC_Draino]

Gee, I wonder if there was any massive government program recently forced upon everyone that changed people’s immune systems with no longterm studies

What could it be?!

[JD Vance @JDVance]

The most important point about Claudine Gay's plagiarism isn't that she was fired, but that she had the job--the most prestigious job in higher education--after an extremely thin record of accomplishment. Claudine Gay has never published an article--even a plagiarized one--that really mattered, or significantly advanced scholarship. She got her job not through merit, but because she checked a box. In this, she is not an outlier, but a representative of a system of education that rewards mediocrity.

Our entire elite is like this. People who got their jobs because they checked boxes, not because they achieved something amazing or accomplished something meaningful. That is now the purpose of our elite universities, to give credentials that signal fake merit rather than rely on real excellence.

This is why you should mock the public health experts who want you to mask toddlers in their schools to stop the spread of a respiratory virus. These public health experts are not smart or accomplished, they have a credential from an institution that cares more about box checking than merit.

This is why you should ignore the economists who tell you that mass migration raises the wages of the working class or has no effect on housing prices, even though I've heard from multiple corporate leaders that they want more immigration in order to pay their workers lower wages. These economists are not smart or accomplished, they have a credential from an institution that cares more about box checking than merit.

This is why you should laugh at the foreign policy experts who will tell you that we should allow east Asia to make all of our steel, phones, and pharmaceuticals, while sending all of our weapons to a war in Eastern Europe that has little to do with our core national interests. These foreign policy experts are not smart or accomplished, they have a credential from an institution that cares more about box checking than merit.

This is why you should scorn the attorneys who tell you that Donald Trump committed "insurrection" and should be thrown off the ballot. They have no special legal knowledge. They are political hacks pretending to be lawyers, and they are not smart or accomplished, they have a credential from an institution that cares more about box checking than merit.

This is why you should question the doctors who tell you to prescribe experimental pharmaceuticals to gender-confused children. These doctors are not smart or accomplished, they have a credential from an institution that cares more about box checking than merit.

The real story of Harvard is not Claudine Gay's firing but this:

You are ruled by thousands of people who are just as mediocre. Their power relies on tax advantages from the federal government, a DEI bureaucracy backed by Biden's Department of Justice, and the implicit consent of millions of Americans.

I say we withdraw that consent, and all the favors that come along with it.

[Speaking of Women's Health @SPKwomenshealth]

12/31/23 123 123 Let’s Go into the New Year! 2024 🎉🎊🪅 Tune into our 2nd season of the Speaking of Women’s Health podcast 🎤 You Live our motto “Be Strong. Be Healthy. And Be in Charge!” Subscribe/ follow for FREE anywhere you listen to podcasts.

[Steve Kirsch @stkirsch]

Great video. Take a couple of minutes and watch it.

[Stetson @stetson_thacker]

Excellent precision oncology paper I just came across after listening to @ShepardDale's @ClevelandClinic Cancer Advances podcast:

Modeling Costs and Life-Years Gained by Population-Wide #NGS or Single-Gene Testing (SGT) in Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the U.S.🧬🧵

[DC_Draino @DC_Draino]

BREAKING: Hundreds of Democrat Insurrectionists storm US Capitol calling for Gaza ceasefire

Did the Hamas Caucus coordinate to allow them access?

This is the darkest day in our democracy

We must create the October 18th Committee and hold these domestic extremists accountable!

[Tom G Thacker II 🇺🇲 @tomgt2]

#NewProfilePic

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Every parent should watch this

[Tom Elliott @tomselliott]

Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 1

Media: The Unvaccinated Are Scum

[KidRock @KidRock]

My new hero.  -Kid rock

[Speaking of Women's Health @SPKwomenshealth]

Dr thacker begins 3rd thread of Speaking. Podcasting with reading her chapter 1 of the 2nd book she authored. The Cle Clinic guide to #Menopause https://t.co/gm8Df4DYui

[🇺🇸Evan🇺🇸 @LifeLibertyEvan]

We went from a military industrial complex to a healthcare industrial complex.