@TaliaRinger This is a fun one: follows nicely from the fact that h-levels are closed under retractions, along with the fact that pointwise equality is a proposition:
https://t.co/zL3mrDeAiw
@jonmsterling @TaliaRinger Yeah, it's pretty arcane... You have to be *very* careful about what you let reduce, and program with the mindset that anything could be a meta lol
I'd love to survey big-name FPers / inventors of FP-concepts about their (self-described) level of category theory knowledge. I think there's a huge gap between outsiders' vs self-perception on this one.
Just finished reading Bรฉnabou's "Fibered Categories and the foundations of naive category theory". Wow, so perceptive and modern in its concerns (foreshadowing of lots stuff clarified by HoTT). Also quite sassy in places. Thanks to @totbwf for bringing this to my attention!
Iโm catching up on the virtual double categories workshop (https://t.co/kMwk0NSHPw) because the talks are a bit late in my time zone. What a gem: Mattew di Meglio tells us that cofunctors between topological spaces are open maps!
@uberwensch_@littmath The categorical POV is that we define operations like union/intersection/complement on *subobjects* of some fixed X, rather than on objects themselves. It's a bit funky at first, but lines up nicely when we look at the classifying maps for subobjects.