Trendnation

farming data in the silicon prairie.

[Trendnation @trendnation]

@walterkirn Might be click bait.

[Nick shirley @nickshirleyy]

🚨 Here is the full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud, this might be my most important work yet. We uncovered over $110,000,000 in ONE day. Like it and share it around like wildfire! Its time to hold these corrupt politicians and fraudsters accountable

We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening, the fraud must be stopped.

[Trendnation @trendnation]

@unusual_whales “DEAREST JEFFREY,
I WOULD LIKE TO INQUIRE VIA THIS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE EVIDENTIARY NOTE AS TO HOW I MAY BEST ENGAGE IN UNETHICAL SEXY GOOD TIMES WITH MY FEMALE MENTEE.

TRULY, HERS IS A BUTT THAT WONT QUIT.

SEXUALLY,
LAWRENCE HENRY SUMMERS”

[Trendnation @trendnation]

@micsolana Good luck finding a seat with all the homeless folks that’ll be riding around all day. “We haven’t solved any of our problems, could I interest you in some new ones?”

[Trendnation @trendnation]

@countyhwy It’s America’s only newspaper!

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

🧵THE UNIPARTY UNMASKED – They Believe They Are “Democracy”

The seven NGOs in the chart below, in my view, represent the Uniparty. Each of these organizations receives substantial financial support from USAID or the Department of State.

Around 2019, the phrase “democracy in danger” began to dominate public discourse, amplified by the media. This was odd—after all, the U.S. is a democracy (or more precisely, a constitutional republic). But as I traced the influence of these NGOs, a pattern emerged: they are controlled by establishment politicians, they play a major role in shaping political narratives worldwide, and their core mission is always framed as “protecting democracy.”

Originally, these NGOs were created to support U.S. democratic efforts abroad—many of them emerging during the Cold War to combat the spread of communism. But with the fall of the Soviet Union, their original purpose faded. Instead of dissolving, they redefined their mission. Now, they have positioned themselves as the guardians of democracy itself.

This shift explains why Trump’s re-election was framed as a "threat to democracy." To these NGOs, “democracy” means themselves. Their survival depends on maintaining that role, and any challenge to their authority is perceived as a direct attack on democracy itself.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

🚨 I Am Living Proof That DEI Is Fake 🚨

It’s been almost a week since I was doxxed, and my life has changed permanently. A traditional Big Tech job is no longer an option—not because I lack the skills or experience, but because of what I’ve stood for. I didn’t do this for profit; I was already successful. And I don’t want to frame myself as a victim.

But here’s the reality: if I had aligned with the “right” ideology, my identity alone—deaf, female, and so on—would have been enough to open doors, maybe even land me a movie deal. Instead, my stance has made me a target to the point that I’ve had to completely uproot my life.

I’m incredibly grateful for the overwhelming support I’ve received on X and am leaning into it. But that support exists alongside an equally extreme level of hatred—hatred so intense that it has forced me to leave. That contrast should serve as a wake-up call. DEI, as it’s commonly practiced, isn’t about inclusion or equity. It’s about ideological conformity. And if proof is needed, I am it.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

I received some interesting info from a credible source, as follows. @DOGE_TREAS may want to know if they don't already:

One of the lasting impacts of the PATRIOT Act is its requirement for financial institutions to report all transactions over $3,000 to the U.S. Treasury—a threshold that has never been adjusted for inflation. This data-sharing framework, originally intended to track illicit financial activity, also allows financial institutions to share transaction insights with each other under absolute legal immunity.

In practice, this means that major financial institutions effectively operate their own version of FinCEN internally, gaining a comprehensive, real-time view of global money movements. While regulatory safeguards exist to ensure this data is used strictly for financial crime enforcement, it's highly likely that the Treasury’s vast database holds key records on NGO funding flows.

Yet, there’s a growing concern that Treasury itself isn’t actively monitoring this data—outsourcing the heavy lifting to financial institutions instead. Whether due to oversight or intent, this leaves critical financial crime data untouched at the federal level.

Could this be why some are so resistant to @DOGE's involvement in Treasury systems? It’s less about routine transactions and more about preventing independent analysis of a financial intelligence goldmine.

[Peter Bernegger @PeterBernegger]

Yes both 'sides' are actively Smurfing, i.e. criminally laundering money into their political campaigns. Rough percentages: ActBlue and liberals - 85% of the total monies. WinRed and RINOS - 15%. Money is coming from the US Treasury, Ukraine, USAID; and some billionaires such as @reidhoffman (President Trump is coming for you cheater), China, perhaps Iran. The law firms envolved (we have the goods on them) Marc Elias and also his former employer Perkins Coie law firm (Trump's coming for you a***oles also). @immutablechrist

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

Is this really all you people have?
I have serious documented personal disagreements with Elon and I don’t always like what he does. But when shit like this “gold bars” story happens and you find $20 billion (for starters) was whooshed off books to “programs” that are basically digital boiler room storefronts — not even concrete proposals but promises to eventually find their way to something concrete far in the future — I can’t summon outrage about “muh checks and balances.” If Congress was doing its fucking job these things would never have been appropriated, and its the same with USAID and DOD and DOS and DOE and HHS and even DOI… not just the money, the people all have to go.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

The @DOGE team just discovered that FEMA sent $59M LAST WEEK to luxury hotels in New York City to house illegal migrants.

Sending this money violated the law and is in gross insubordination to the President’s executive order.

That money is meant for American disaster relief and instead is being spent on high end hotels for illegals!

A clawback demand will be made today to recoup those funds.

[Trendnation @trendnation]

@walterkirn RFK will handle it. We’ll get real Coke soon enough, and if we’re lucky, just a hint of methylene blue in every bottle.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

🔍 HOW TO READ THE DATA: TURNING POINT DOES NOT RECEIVE USAID DOLLARS
USAID grant money is everywhere. It’s so deeply woven into the nonprofit world that tracing it is like testing $100 bills for cocaine—at a certain scale, every charity has some residue.

That’s why the disclaimer at the top of the website exists:

**"NOTE: Funding is fungible, meaning USAID dollars do not directly flow into these NGOs in a literal sense. Instead, the money moves through multiple layers, with various entities handling and redistributing it.

Rather than focusing solely on individual grants or making definitive statements about how NGOs benefit from USAID, it’s more important to recognize the broader pattern of funding distribution and influence—and to cut through the layers of unaccountability."**

So, how do you determine if an NGO is truly dependent on USAID money? Context matters.

Let’s go back to the cocaine analogy: Every $100 bill has trace amounts, but a drug dealer’s cash will be covered in it. The same logic applies here.

🔹 Look at the graph on the left. That’s Defending Democracy Together Institute, Bill Kristol’s group. Over half of their funding comes from major grants. That’s a lot of cocaine.

🔹 Now, compare it to Turning Point USA on the right. Their USAID connections are multiple hops away and bottlenecked by the smallest possible intermediary grants. Even with the most extreme assumptions, only 0.2% of their funding could possibly come from this path.

This isn’t just theory for me. I worked with Charlie Kirk during the 2024 election on early voting analysis. I saw firsthand how his operation worked, and I can say with confidence: President Trump would not have won re-election without him. He flipped voter registrations on their head and made a direct push for young male voters.

Bottom line: These graphs are tools, not verdicts. Use them wisely.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

And, Nancy Pelosi is a member of the same NGO too. Fun!

[The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee]

Trump Becomes First Fascist In History To Reduce Size Of Government https://t.co/Cj7IpT5sYI

[Thomas Sowell Quotes @ThomasSowell]

“Propagandists in the classroom are a luxury that the poor can afford least of all. While a mastery of mathematics and English can be a ticket out of poverty, a highly cultivated sense of grievance and resentment is not.”

— Thomas Sowell

[Eric Weinstein @ericweinstein]

I asked ChatGPT the following.

Imagine a modern poltical party.

Imagine that all you know about it is the following:

It champions rights for state sponsored schools over the rights of the parents on behalf of their own children.

It promotes equality of outcome over a level playing field.

It is concerned that unfeterred speech is a threat to the safety of the population.

It supports candidates chosen by party leaders rather than the people via primary elections.

It celebrates choices for irreversable self-sterilization via reproductive surgical mutilation within the K-12 curriculum.

It does not want people to have to show ID to vote.

Q: To which political parties is this unspecified party most similar worldwide and throughout history?

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

The National Library of Medicine published a study that found SARS-CoV-2 binds more strongly to ACE2 variants in European, South Asian, and African populations than in East Asians and Ashkenazi Jews.

Why would the NIH publish @RobertKennedyJr's anti-semitic conspiracy theory?

[Robert F. Kennedy Jr @RobertKennedyJr]

@nypost .@LevineJonathan exploited this OFF-THE-RECORD conversation to smear me by association with an outlandish conspiracy theory.

[Robert F. Kennedy Jr @RobertKennedyJr]

The @nypost story is mistaken. I have never, ever suggested that the COVID-19 virus was targeted to spare Jews. I accurately pointed out — during an off-the-record conversation — that the U.S. and other governments are developing ethnically targeted bioweapons and that a 2021 study of the COVID-19 virus shows that COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect certain races since the furin cleave docking site is most compatible with Blacks and Caucasians and least compatible with ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews. In that sense, it serves as a kind of proof of concept for ethnically targeted bioweapons. I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered. That study is here: https://t.co/AcR62aLrdX