The “block your rapist” discourse is especially funny because women view it as men making light of rape, but in reality women have cheapened “rape” so much to the point where they feel comfortable continuing to associate with their “rapist”
I asked police officers to tell me what incidents they had been to which should be in the media but aren’t.
These are just a few.
Remember - social media rewards outrage. News outlets make money off outrage.
There is so much good happening all the time, and people being helped in their darkest days, that you will never hear about because it doesn’t sell.
Woman defending the men who “raped” them has got to be one of the most important discoveries, on par with blacks not hearing the smoke alarm chirp or Indians somehow always getting hit by trains
sounds like two people responsible and self-aware enough to know what they’re equipped to handle, and opted to avoid bringing a child into the world who would suffer and they would resent. 🤷🏾♀️
This is...obviously correct?
The elephant in the room with the "Why are women friends with (their) rapists?" conversation is that - speaking as a trained lawyer and former collegiate official - "my rapist" here basically NEVER means "forcible attacker of strangers or unwilling 1st dates."
The term is being used in the campus-feminist, behavior-X-is-over-the-legal-line-in-Utah sense to describe drunken lovers, badgering boyfriends, people who held your head too long at the end, etc. Cads.
In this context, "reclaiming my power" means "made HIM eat it the next time, backed up by the subtle threat of a charge." Women do not seem terrified by their ~consensual club-bathroom lovers because...they are not. Quite obviously, no XX humans are still buddies with ACTUAL knife-wielding sex criminals.
Police have to react to the limited details they know, THEN assess and reevaluate.
They turn up to multiple (false, but they don't know that of the time) allegations of a drunk, abusive and violent man. They detain that man (in case he is drunk, abusive and violent) and then assess. Within one minute they release the man and switch into (a) trying to save his life and (b) securing the scene and detaining suspects for a GBH / Murder inquiry.
And this apparently is evidence of racism.
I genuinely don't get it.
You say that post-Floyd DEI training created the policing culture that killed Henry Nowak. This is testable. If you're right, the pattern should begin after 2020. It doesn't.
Christopher Alder, 1998. Falklands veteran. Dragged handcuffed and unconscious into a Hull custody suite. Left face down on the floor. Officers stood around while he choked to death. Ten minutes before anyone helped. Inquest: unlawful killing. Five officers charged. All acquitted.
Sean Rigg, 2008. Schizophrenic man, died at Brixton police station after restraint. Inquest found "unsuitable and unnecessary force" and police failings "more than minimally" contributed to his death.
Robert Edwards, 2011. Died in a Suffolk cell. The IPCC found police "failed to take appropriate care" and didn't carry out proper welfare checks. The coroner said he should never have been deemed fit for detention.
Wayne Couzens, 2015–2021. Reported for indecent exposure in 2015. Kent Police had his name, address, and plate number. The investigating sergeant knew his brother, also a police officer. No action. Failed vetting twice, still became a Met officer. Exposed himself days before murdering Sarah Everard. The investigating officer lied about CCTV. Three forces had twenty years of red flags. Nothing to do with DEI
Post-Floyd, still no DEI involvement: Stephen Reardon, 2023, had seizures in a police van while the officer said he was "playing games". Died. Jerome Cowan, 2022, found unresponsive in a library, officers failed to provide first aid. Died. A man at St Erth, 2022, left drunk and vulnerable outside a railway station on a cold night, officers drove past without stopping. Died. All officers dismissed or facing gross misconduct.
Same pattern every time. A person in distress needs help, officers dismiss it or walk away. It happened in 1998, 2008, 2011, 2022, 2023, and 2025. DEI didn't create it. It predates it by a generation.
You also claim "determined, institutional silence". The Speaker acknowledged the case on 1 June. The Home Secretary called it "a horrifying act" and Digwa's false accusation "an evil act" in an oral statement to the Commons on 2 June. Debated in both Houses. Starmer and Baddenoch clashed over it. Front-page news for a week. There is no silence. You invented it because your baseless argument needs it.
You ask pretentiously what you call a system where a dying teenager's word counts for less than his killer's.
I'd ask you: what do you call a system where Christopher Alder choked to death on a custody floor in 1998 while officers stood around, and twenty-seven years later Henry Nowak bled to death saying the same words?
That is an ideology. But not the one you're describing. It's an institutional ideology of indifference to people in police custody, and it has been killing people for decades.
Blaming a training course that's existed for five years for a rot that's existed for hundreds of years isn't analysis. It's a deflection that protects the actual dangerous ideology.
the fascinating thing about women complaining about this tweet is that the implication of it is that men actually think rape is so bad that women should, at a bare minimum, stop associating with their alleged rapist yet women think it's making light of rape.
what’s funny about the responses to this by women is that men are expected to cut off and shame their friends who turn out to be rapists, but suddenly there’s more "nuance" to it when a woman keeps contact with the guy that raped her
Realising Apple went public at under $2 billion and 15 times revenue in 1980.
SpaceX wants you to buy at $2 trillion and 100 times revenue in 2026.
That is not getting in early. That is being the exit for venture capitalists who have held this equity for years at a fraction of what you are being asked to pay.
Almost none of the retail investors buying this IPO will read the 300 pages before the book closes on June 11.
That is your entire competitive advantage right there.